What do you think?
Rate this book
110 pages, Paperback
Published November 30, 2021
‘A threadlike obsession begs for a fissure through which to recall, from within a free soul, a lost moment of a past that is constantly less stable, more emaciated and evanescent. Sentences arrive not quite crystallized, as if coming from somebody talking on a beach alone, convinced no one else can hear them, that no one can collect them to confirm or deny them. Sentences that are immediately buried by the sand of that careless loss. Byobu thinks: there is no despair quite like the shadow that collapses down upon our most guarded memories, akin to a wall without ivy, the ivy piling up at its base, with no sense of purpose or beauty, a green tomb, a dark mass grave.’
‘he always looks at everything with eyes that are also tongue and touch and ears and sex, letting himself be penetrated by the world and lamenting not having a magical memory where everything seen and sensed and everything read in the prodigious coagulations of the alphabet enters for eternity.’
And on a different note,' said Byobu, who possessed an intractable inclination to complicate topics, multiplying them. He would open parentheses and not always find an opportune time to close them. This unexpected aperture had a propensity for accepting some new thematic offering. Was this a form of charity, not leaving any idea out in the cold, however removed it may be from the topic that was, for everyone else, at hand? The world loves conversations in straight lines and single-minded strides. Intersections divert. Labyrinths confound. Knots are usually despised, since the days of Alexander, when he was yet to be Great. But Byobu doesn't right his rhizomatic prolongations.
He has to be constantly reminded of the words of Pindar: 'in the Argive way / my tale will be told with brevity.' He sympathizes with the Argives, agreeing in essence with this maxim, and he embraces it for the individual units that make up his stories; but when the time comes to unite them, he can't avoid meandering.
poetry seeks to extract from its abyss certain words that might constitute the scar tissue we are all unconsciously chasing.uruguayan poet and writer ida vitale, at 97 years old, is the last living member of the generation '45 (which included juan carlos onetti and mario benedetti). in 2019, the bbc included her on a list of the most influential women in the world (along with greta thunberg, megan rapinoe, and alexandria ocasio-cortez). with over 20 books of poetry and more than dozen prose works to her name, only a scant pair of have been rendered into english — despite an award-winning career (cervantes, garcía lorca, alfonso reyes, and octavio paz prizes) spanning more than a half-century.
and there's another problem that not only he considers, but also, he supposes, the well-mannered few who still dare to think with their heads, ignoring the indifferent river that washes away the miseries propagated and imposed by a single power, now manifest and indisputable: does injustice, with its awful lack of solidarity, exist so that those who witness it can draw strength from the spiritual poverty that causes it, searching inside themselves from some inner virtue, as small as it may be, to step beyond the range of the darts of that unavoidable human trait?*translated from the spanish by sean manning
Poetry seeks to extract from its abyss certain words that might constitute the scar tissue we are all unconsciously chasing.
•
Words are a way of organizing our inner turmoil, of being better than alone, silent. Sometimes we must make them alter the way they walk through the world, their impure usage to whose sueded automatism we become accustomed.
•
There are fewer of them than there are trees; they can have roots descending downwards, but they don't grow upwards. Deep down, they find the sky disturbing. If they encounter it, they never again feel at ease in the savage throats of men. [81]
...and he's invigorated by the freedom with which someone who squanders the entire written application of the language can forge with such autonomous flights of orality their own fragile welds, as if these had emerged from some sacred and magical eternity. [50]
"There is a story. No one knows exactly when it began. Those who might be associated with it are, in fact, unaware that the story exists. It has no name to identify it, and it is unclear whether it has one protagonist or two. It could be A's story that B does not acknowledge, or vice versa. It could also be that neither of them knows the story exists and that it involves them. It is very likely that one will die without ever realizing that he is the story's true protagonist, and that the other has usurped his role. In any event, a story's existence, even if not well defined or well assigned, even if only in its formative stage, just barely latent, emits vague but urgent emanations."