What do you think?
Rate this book
144 pages, Paperback
First published December 1, 1994
I don't think of Jungian psychology as a religion, but I know I owe my life to it. Once upon a time I was on my knees. After a few years of analysis I could stand on two feet, more or less erect. That experience has coloured my life. If someone were to ask, I'd be hard pressed to differentiate my single-minded zeal for Jung from the religious fervor that characterizes a born-again Christian, or any other evangelical for that matter. I'm not happy with this comparison, but there you are (p19-20).What about Brillig, the host and retired analyst?
There have been many in my life, both men and women, who did not like me. I don't wonder why. I was selfish, opinionated and mean spirited. I dare say I still am. Perhaps the only difference now is that I know it (p9).And in his eighties he takes delight in standing on his head. (A more detailed and elaborate introduction to Brillig is found in Sharp's fun and interesting Chicken Little: The Inside Story (A Jungian Romance), where we learn that 'Ms. Little personified an archetypal motif, [and has a] close psychological link with the Sumerian goddess Inanna' (p19).)
Brillig limped over to rummage in a trunk in the corner. Even with my inferior intuition I had a good idea what he was after. Adam is the only person I know, besides myself, who travels with a complete set of Jung’s Collected Works (p32).This brings a smile to my face, as the ‘basic’ collected works is 20 volumes. What does it say about Sharp? Brillig?
’Our education system is oriented to the child, but who is to educate the educator? What of the child, the primitive, within the [unconscious] grown-up? … Our education system,’ said Adam, ‘suffers from a one-sided approach to the child who is to be educated, and from an equally one-sided lack of emphasis on the character of the educator. People like to speak of training the child’s personality. Parents for the most part are incompetent. As often as not they’re half children themselves and will always remain so. This is no secret; it’s so well known that we expect great things of trained professionals, heaven help us, self-styled experts stuffed full of soulless psychology and ill-assorted views on what constitutes personality.This is a very well written, fun, and powerful book. Thank you, Daryl Sharp. It has helped me. Helped us. And is worth a re-read and I have since finishing it looked at it from time to time.
‘I dare say you’ve seen them, posturing in halls of learning, pontificating in print and on TV — shallow-pates, inflated peacocks more interested in showing off what they know than in caring for the young. They are solidly convinced of their competence and feel grown up. They are no more nor less than what you see, living proof that people really do exist who believe they’re what they pretend to be. Woe betide if they were ever to doubt themselves; uncertainty would cripple them, undermine their authority. The truth, by and large, is that they suffer from the same defective education as their hapless young charges, and have just as little personality (p.32-3)