Thor : Ragnarok

Une production absolument massive qui entraîne les éléments enfantins de Star Wars dans le monde de Thor et qui est plus colorée en termes de costumes et de maquillage que Le Cinquième Élément. Mais je ne voulais pas que Thor aille dans cette direction. Que 70% de la durée du film soit une situation comique légèrement infantile où rien n'est résolu. Ce qui ne veut pas dire que les foules qui aiment Les Gardiens de la Galaxie ne s'amuseront pas royalement. C'est le but. (13/11/2017)

Never mind the destruction of the soul, never mind the darkness. Let's enjoy the ride. After the amazing second Guardians of the Galaxy, New Zealand joker Taika Waititi arrives in a garbage spaceship to transform Thor’s theatrical woodenness and mythological sculpture into a highly human portrait of a ripped daffodil that has daddy issues and is morbidly dependent on its phallic pride - a giant hammer. Marvel tried out this seriously unserious style in the third Iron Man, and thanks to the Guardians of the Galaxy, Marvel already knows that people want escape, retro, and nonsensical alien worlds inhabited by eccentric piles of rocks and other strange homuncules. The third Thor thus resembles a euphoric 8-bit arcade, which uses only the X and Y axes to move, but you can also enjoy a lot of gags, shooters and action escapades. It's not without its flaws. Hemsworth sometimes tries so hard that he distorts his face, and the joke-a-minute syndrome does lead to dead spots. Moreover, Thor does not have much of an elegant plot, where the traditional world-destroying motif is transformed into a moving statement about family relationships like the second Guardians of the Galaxy. The fashionable hooker Hela it's quite amusing, but everything around her is rather desperately generic, so the accumulated eruption of energy at the end eventually leads to clichés. Fortunately, Taika almost always accompanies them with some full-fledged ironic gags that will restore balance to the universe. Did you want an empty, badass, yet confidently biting spectacle? Here's your stuffed portion. (27/10/2017)

I didn’t have that much fun. Like Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, the third Thor wants to be a very family friendly film, so it crams in a bunch of characters that are completely useless, but every viewer gets a chance to pick their favourite. It mixes in humor, because is needed, and visually and musically, it references the 1980s because that was a cool era. Or something like that. Well, again, it all works only halfway. Taika Waititi and Chris Hemsworth, who is good at comedic acting, push the humour forward so much that the film grinds along like an adventure flick. So while there are some truly spectacular things happening on screen and the story has the potential to be epic, with scenes that send chills down the spine, overall it's more of a comic book sitcom. There's so much comedy and over-the-top characters that when it comes to the real fight for life and the fate of Asgard, it doesn't work. The banter and buddy chemistry with the Hulk are fine. But when everything else doesn't work because of it, and the fight with the goddess of death has about as much emotional impact as waiting in line at the post office, I see that as a problem. I'm not saying I didn't have fun, but I really probably won't watch it again in the years to come. Maybe I wouldn't mind if Marvel started having a bit more ambition than just making "big, successful, and pretty cool" movies. (27/07/2018)

The funniest and probably also the best Marvel movie I’ve ever seen. Plus there’s even some 1980s music that fits the story perfectly. It was literally as if Daft Punk started yet another movie music orgy after Tron. Anyways, I realize that choosing a very alternative New Zealand director Taika Waititi must have been a big risk. Especially since most of the dialogues were improvised. You could expect anything at all, but once you know what kind of brilliant movies he’s already filmed, you can just hope that Thor: Ragnarok will be a success and so will Taika. Of course, it’s also important whether you like Thor as a character. I’d say it’s currently the best, the most original, the most inventive, the funniest Marvel cinematic universe character. However, the movie has taken this originality and wittiness to a whole new level. I haven’t laughed this hard watching a movie for a long time. The improvisation has brought some amazing scenes to life and I’d be surprised if people didn’t talk about them and even make parodies of them. Furthermore, the story itself is great, Jeff Goldblum is brilliant as a leader of a planet riddled with trash. And Mark Ruffalo as Hulk is probably the most prominent he’s ever been. Everybody has their say; Anthony Hopkins, Karl Urban, Cate Blanchett, Tessa Thompson, Idris Elba, even Benedict Cumberbatch who has proved that he’s funny with a single scene. Unlike his own – often far too serious – movie Doctor Strange. And don’t even get me started on all the cameos in Ragnarok, one of them played by the director himself, as has become a tradition. Overall, I thought it was more than amazing. I don’t think I’ll see anything better or more fun this year. Or ever. (07/11/2017)

“Darling, you have no idea what's possible.” I hope Waititi's next film is an adaptation of the Robot Unicorn Attack flash game, because this wasn’t far from it. Though the New Zealander with a fondness for pineapple-print shirts didn't write the screenplay, I think he deserves credit for how colourful, nutty and stylistically diverse the whole film is. In just the first few minutes, we become witnesses to the protagonist’s self-ironic conversation with a skeleton, a variation on the “Look at my shit” scene from Spring Breakers and a parody of the theatrical, statuesque nature of Thor’s first solo movie. I actually found it regrettable that Waititi had to stick to the Marvel canon and expand the MCU (the scene with Strange was a bit superfluous) and couldn’t construct the whole film as a laid-back buddy movie in which Thor’s patience is gradually tested by Loki, a talking pile of rocks who wants to start a revolution, a perpetually plastered Valkyrie, and an egghead with seven doctorates and a problem with self-control. The characters and their sparkling dialogue draw more attention to themselves than another generic plot with a goddess of death who wants to unleash hell because she has daddy issues. Fortunately, the narrative structure is partially adapted to this. After the main storyline gets rolling, the protagonist is plunged into a world where he has to deal with completely different concerns, so rectifying the situation on Asgard, of which Thor is informed only through hearsay, has to be delayed. On top of that, the protagonist is merely pulled along by fate (or by the Hulk) more than once and cannot freely make decisions; things happen without his input. The subversiveness of this approach, which turns the whole superhero concept on its head, culminates in the climax, when the problem is resolved differently (and by someone else) than you would expect. When you add the actors enjoying their roles (Tessa Thompson and Jeff Goldblum are particularly superb), the arcade-inspired action scenes and the cleverly dumb humour to the methodical rejection (or, as the case may be, commenting on and mocking) of the rules of the game, you get a movie that will either irritate you with its refusal to take anything seriously or thrill you as the most entertaining Marvel movie ever. For me, it was the latter. 85% (29/10/2017)