Réalisation:
Benjamin ChristensenScénario:
Benjamin ChristensenPhotographie:
Johan AnkerstjerneActeurs·trices:
Maren Pedersen, Clara Pontoppidan, Elith Pio, Oscar Stribolt, Tora Teje, Benjamin Christensen, Poul Reumert, Karen Winther, Kate Fabian (plus)VOD (1)
Résumés(1)
Présenté à la manière d'une conférence, Häxan est un film-documentaire sur la sorcellerie, de l'antiquité à la période contemporaine du film (1922). La sorcellerie est représentée avec soin par des illustrations tirées d'ouvrages médiévaux et des reconstitutions filmiques. Du sabbat des sorcières aux interrogatoires de l'inquisition, les illustrations classiques prennent vie dans des visions spectrales inquiétantes utilisant tous les effets spéciaux disponibles à l'époque : surimpressions, maquettes, jump cuts, stop motion, maquillages et prothèses. (Potemkine Films)
(plus)Vidéo (2)
Critiques (3)
A rarity among films of the silent era. To some extent, it’s a fascinating comprehensive look at the history of witchcraft, divided into seven parts. The first is a brief excursion, using static images and a pointer, into the medieval naive view of the Earth and the universe and the contemporary view of the phenomenon of witchcraft. The fascinating spectacle begins from the second part, when Christensen, with the help of actors and a perfect period set, presents a fictional reconstruction of the phenomenon. Witches fly around on broomsticks, attend satanic ceremonies, spit and step on the sign of Christ, cook toddlers in cauldrons, ritualistically kiss the Devil's anus as the Devil's mistresses, give birth to little devils, urinate in bowls and then pour the urine over the neighbour's door to put a death curse on him. We also see the disgusting methods of the Inquisition, their trials and interrogations using torture, various superstitions of the time such as the cursing of a husband's bed with a rope full of knots, where one knot means the thwarted conception of an offspring, etc. In the last part Christensen moves to the present and presents bizarre analogies between hysteria and witchcraft, as well as mental disorders and various conditions such as sleepwalking, kleptomania, etc., thus reinforcing his sceptical view of superstitions about witchcraft. ()
A remarkable example that already in the early 1920s cinema could be used as a tool of manipulation to produce excessive subjective expressions and shocked viewers. Christensen has a solid concept and a great set design, thanks to which some of the scenes and ideas remain effective even after a hundred years, but the documentary format packed with headlines and pointers is quite annoying and interpretively barren. Naturally, I agree with the condemnation of the Inquisition and I admire the craftsmanship, but the combination of a narrative and an explicitly descriptive approaches did not impress me so much, so 4* mainly out of respect for the creator’s courage at that time. 70% ()
Eliciting horror isn't the film's primary intention, yet many scenes are genuinely frightening, not in their depiction but primarily in their consequences. The film avoids directly depicting violence, yet its message is highly effective, making it one of the documentaries that truly addresses its time excellently. ()
Photos (61)
Photo © Kino International
Annonces