Primal Fear

Very strong 4*. Thrillers set mostly in courtrooms may smack of boredom, but I have the best experience with them and I always enjoy watching them. Moreover, Primal Fear is one of the better films in this category. The plot is the kind that has been rehashed a hundred times, but it’s excellently executed and brilliantly supported by the truly great performance of Edward Norton. He literally shines here and, in my opinion, adds a different dimension to the concept of a movie psychopath. Of course, Richard Gere also deserves praise, he doesn’t disappoint in the lead role and portrays the character of the arrogant lawyer very well. The dialogue is tolerable and meaningful to a given extent, and although the story is rather tedious and flows along slowly, it’s easy to follow, and after watching it, the positives in the form of the actors and also the direction clearly prevail. (09/07/2011)

There's this "90's vibe" that I can't quite put a name to, but it definitely had an effect on me throughout the film. Maybe it's because the exteriors were shot a little differently back then, the soundtrack used to be more restless/nervous than bombastic, and the atmosphere could be very imaginatively evoked even just by a "nighttime run" through the backstreets of the Big Apple. I got a bit nostalgic; but now to the substance. Norton is absolutely fantastic, Gere satisfactory, Laura Linney good within reason. The script is mainly designed so that the actors have something to work with, and there's no shortage of twists and turns, which actually feel quite tidy in the end and don't necessarily feel contrived or like a bet on a "shocking denouement". Gregory Hoblit was then able to use his craftsmanship to create an extremely suspenseful courtroom drama that can be considered the pinnacle of its genre. In addition, he de facto discovered and brought to wider awareness Edward Norton, who went on to create some memorable characters in the late 1990s. For me, this is the best Hoblit. (05/04/2013)

As much as I dislike lawyers, I do agree (albeit begrudgingly) that we need them. I didn't mind Martin Vail as the lawyer character, I just didn't like Richard Gere who played him. He’s an extremely overrated actor; I’ve always thought of him as more of a sleazy type. The film had an interesting theme, and while I have some reservations concerning the execution, they are just minor gripes. What I’d like to highlight is Edward Norton's superb performance which was the pillar of the film. Aaron/Roy didn’t get that much screen time, but his scenes were the reason why I’m giving the film four stars. The rest of the actors seemed like they were only there as support for the actual main character. / Lesson learned: Everyone has the right to defend themselves, no matter how much it pisses me off in some cases. (09/07/2022)

Primal Fear is gripping, and it is unexpectedly brutal in detail considering it is a mainstream thriller. It is a movie that is well made in every way, with the debut of Edward Norton in a supporting role, who succeeded in perfectly and totally eclipsing the star powerhouse lead that was Richard Gere and it actually fits the tone of the movie perfectly. Bravo. (01/20/2022)

If there is something perfect that deserves a five-star rating about this film, it is definitely Edward Norton's performance in the role of a man accused of murdering a celebrity. In his debut, he showed immense potential with his talent and both critics and film viewers were amazed by him. He has certainly rightfully ranked among the most significant names of his acting generation. I have no problem with Richard Gere in the lead male role either, who is, although two or three levels worse than Norton, still good enough, and above all, Gere was perfectly cast in a role that he masterfully controls, and he has experience in portraying these types of self-confident elegant characters. However, what bothers me is the screenplay. It's the typical Hollywood construction that tries to manipulate the viewer as much as possible and prepares a "shocking" twist at the very end. That is exactly what pleases many film fans on the other hand. It's not about the fact that the perpetrator plans 20 moves ahead because every top chess player does that. It's rather about the fact that the brilliant plan counts on the reaction of many involved parties, which cannot be accurately predicted in reality, and if their reactions were to deviate even slightly from the assumptions, the perpetrator would end up in the electric chair very quickly. Not to mention that according to my indirect knowledge, this is not how the American justice system truly works. Overall impression: 65%. (06/16/2010)