Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Connan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guidelines as there is not significant coverage in reliable sources of the subject of the article. Davewild (talk) 17:50, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Connan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Non-notable journalist. Fails both WP:JOURNALIST and WP:BASIC. The fact that she interviewed notable "economic leaders and political figures" is not sufficient, per WP:INHERITED. Edcolins (talk) 09:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Probably a frequently published (incl. television) journalist, so it might be possible that she would pass if she were listed and even discussed for a sentence or two in Bloomberg News in its #International bureaus. However, the article is a brag sheet, and she doesn't have notability enough for a biographical article. Hithladaeus (talk) 18:12, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The interview is entirely about the Charlie Hebdo shooting, not about her. This is not what it is needed to meet WP:JOURNALIST or WP:BASIC.--Edcolins (talk) 11:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.