User talk:Willy2000

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv

Welcome!

Hello, Willy2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Ahunt (talk) 23:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Public holidays in the European Union page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jetstreamer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jalaluddin Airport, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:48, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at TANS Perú Flight 204, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Lyla (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 09:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the 2015 United States Grand Prix page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the 2015 Mexican Grand Prix page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, is there some convention that "motorcycle" in these article names is lowercase? They are proper names and are capitalised on the MotoGP web site. --pmj (talk) 04:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that you have added foreign names to quite a number of more or less random toponyms like Finnish name to the lede of Saint Petersburg or Finnish name to Murmansk Oblast or Estonian and Latvian name to Pskov Oblast, etc. I cannot see any logic in those changes, neither of those cities or administrative regions were historically parts of correspondent states, nor there any significant language minority living there, nor to the best of my knowledge those foreign names are frequently used in English. So what is the logic there? Please before continuing to add similar names discuss the issue somewhere - people are usually quite suspicious and vigilant than they see foreign names added to their countries toponyms without valid reasons, almost as if there was a territorial claim to their countries. Alex Bakharev (talk) 07:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you added factual information to the Germanwings Flight 9525 good article. Would you also add your source of this information, such as newspaper article or web page? On Wikipedia, we can't just add what we know, it all must come from reliable sources. Let me know if you have any questions below or on my talk page. Thanks. Prhartcom (talk) 12:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These articles are great, keep working and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Ueutyi (talk) 02:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Ironholds. Willy2000, thanks for creating 1998 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Final Round!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hey; I note you've been creating a load of articles on world cup rounds, and that's great to see (they're wonderfully formatted!). I don't see any references in them, though; could you include some? Feel free to reach out to me if you'd like help.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ironholds (talk) 22:27, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm AdventurousSquirrel. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 1982 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC and OFC) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 01:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 1982 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC and OFC), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 01:18, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Disco Polo Music has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (television) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article TVN Meteo Active has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (television) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heikki Suhonen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TPS Turku (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 11:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Qed237 (talk) 00:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round#KUW Matches Scheduled 24 and 29 March and stop with your unsourced edits saying that the matches wont be played. Qed237 (talk) 00:23, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to UEFA Euro 2016 qualifying Group A. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Qed237 (talk) 00:44, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vitālijs Teplovs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Group G table. Qed237 (talk) 02:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

András Telek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jilin Aodong

Petteri Kaijasilta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to TPS Turku

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why you are creating so many obviously incomplete articles like these: Serghei Belous, Oleg Fistican, János Bánfi, Zoltán Jagodics, András Telek, Petteri Kaijasilta, and so on...? Why are not adding goals and caps for each player? Who should to complete them for you? --XXN, 14:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Willy, I saw that you added attendance numbers to many of 2015's F1 race report articles. Can you please also provide sources for those numbers? Otherwise, I'll have to take them out again. Thanks! Zwerg Nase (talk) 11:32, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2000 United States Grand Prix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Standard Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making random changes to articles or you will be banned this time. Britmax (talk) 13:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop introducing erroneous changes into the F1 records page. Your changes are inconsistent with established definitions of retirements, non-finishers, etc. and bring the article into contradiction with itself.

Your error has been reverted again. The issue has now been described on the article's talk page. If you damage the article again without explanation, I'll have to report your account for repeated vandalism.