Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypnosis for Weight Loss

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or merge with Hypnosis. Article has no references and for this length could easily be covered under the hypnosis article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 18:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, maybe there's a phrase or sentence that can be merged. No reason for a standalone article for this topic; not a sufficiently notable separate concept. Glenfarclas (talk) 08:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge Our article on hypnotherapy breaks out specific applications into separate articles, e.g. hypnotherapy in childbirth. The first half of Hypnosis for Weight Loss cites notable sources. There isn't enough information given to verify the first two citations, but that is a cleanup problem, not grounds for deletion. The term Hypnosis for Weight Loss produces lots of Google hits, including mainstream sources, mayo clinic, abcnews, msnbc. There's enough material (some critical) to fill out this article.--agr (talk) 09:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with Hell In A Bucket, there may be a sentence or two which could benefit being merged with Hypnosis, but I think this article is a delete. Not sure if GHits is a good indicator on this as I imagine most of them will be commercial- I suppose my point is should there be an article entitled 'Pills for Penis Enlargement' because there are a lot of GHits? I might be wrong, but I think the current article is not sufficient not to be deleted or possibly merged with Hypnosis. DRosin (talk) 21:57, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]