Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 05:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Please note that many names contain the string "shit" especially names from India - be careful that this is not the case before blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. By my read this is just someone writing about YouTube content they created, not a real organization. Just Step Sidewaysfrom this world ..... today 04:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(Trying this again because one of my scripts broke the template)
I have been reverting vandalism and patrolling recent changes for over a month now. The last time my request was declined, I simply hadn't been patrolling for a month at that point, and @Fastily had no other objections. I have consistently warned all vandals I reverted and reported many to AIV. I believe I'm ready to have rollback now. Also note that I am a pending changes reviewer. TheWikiToby (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBottalk 17:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make (especially when reverting good faith edits). Are you aware of tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which make this extremely easy? -Fastily 23:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily Diff by diff:1. Completely forgot that there is a warning template for NOTFORUM. The last time I used that warning was all the way on Sept 13 [3] which is more than a month ago. Completely skipped my mind. 2. I have no explanation on this one; I probably just forgot. 3. No explanation either.The earlier failures seem to be one off mistakes I made that happen to be close together, but the revert that happened just today is definitely very unfortunate for me not to warn. The sea of reverts I've made mostly have warnings other than the above, so I don't exactly know how I managed to forget to warn at all. I'll make sure this doesn't happen again. TheWikiToby (talk) 01:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of notbiting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 21:04, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Yes. I promise a warning/explanation for every revert I perform from now on. TheWikiToby (talk) 21:58, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I've been RC patrolling for a month combined and have the needed mainspace edits.
I always warn users when reverting their edits, either with the default warning template or a custom one if the situation is unique.
I think I understand the policies here, as all of my reports to WP:AIV, WP:RPP and WP:UAA have resulted in action.
I would like Rollback because using more advanced tools like Huggle would make my RC patrolling easier.
Thanks for your time! MolecularPilot 08:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Account creator
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"