User talk:Malvinsub3

Hello Malvinsub3. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Malvinsub3. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Malvinsub3|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:42, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Arctica Finance, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 17:44, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Arctica Finance. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:20, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Malvinsub3. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 20:42, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Malvinsub3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

They are blocking me because I'm new and I am questioning their motives to block me. They have not provided any prof of violations, when I try to undelete the page they redelete without any evidence and block my account. Malvinsub3 (talk) 22:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=They are blocking me because I'm new and I am questioning their motives to block me. They have not provided any prof of violations, when I try to undelete the page they redelete without any evidence and block my account. [[User:Malvinsub3|Malvinsub3]] ([[User talk:Malvinsub3#top|talk]]) 22:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=They are blocking me because I'm new and I am questioning their motives to block me. They have not provided any prof of violations, when I try to undelete the page they redelete without any evidence and block my account. [[User:Malvinsub3|Malvinsub3]] ([[User talk:Malvinsub3#top|talk]]) 22:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=They are blocking me because I'm new and I am questioning their motives to block me. They have not provided any prof of violations, when I try to undelete the page they redelete without any evidence and block my account. [[User:Malvinsub3|Malvinsub3]] ([[User talk:Malvinsub3#top|talk]]) 22:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}