Jump to content

User talk:Jayaguru-Shishya: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 40: Line 40:


{{subst:uw-vanalism1}} You are constantly removing content.
{{subst:uw-vanalism1}} You are constantly removing content.

{{subst:uw-vanalism1}}
Jayaguru-Shishya

Revision as of 15:02, 6 December 2015

MOS:IDENTITY is being revisited: How should Wikipedia refer to transgender individuals before and after their transition?

You are being contacted because you contributed to a recent discussion of MOS:IDENTITY that closed with the recommendation that Wikipedia's policy on transgender individuals be revisited.

Two threads have been opened at the Village Pump:Policy. The first addresses how the Manual of Style should instruct editors to refer to transgender people in articles about themselves (which name, which pronoun, etc.). The second addresses how to instruct editors to refer to transgender people when they are mentioned in passing in other articles. Your participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 02:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation. I'll try to have a look. Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 19:57, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nokia X

Could you clarify your motivation behind this edit? Eman235/talk 19:51, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings User:Eman235! I restored some of the material you deleted (under an ES of "copy-edit"), and also recovered an earlier wording (the new wording removed the sentence from it's context). Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 20:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I sometimes get a little over-zealous... Eman235/talk 02:00, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's okay, User:Eman235! Good work have you done with the article! ;-) Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 02:27, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of online encyclopedias

Thank you for the suggested re-wording of the subheading. I hope it's okay with you that I went ahead with the re-edit based on your thoughts. (I know of a few more state encyclopedias to add, if they have Wikipedia entries!)  :) Floridasand (talk) 19:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Floridasand! Looks fine to me now! :-) Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 23:01, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:uw-vanalism1}} You are constantly removing content.

{{subst:uw-vanalism1}} Jayaguru-Shishya