Talk:Fixation index: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 192.12.88.17 - "" |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{WPStatistics}} |
{{WPStatistics}} |
||
I'm trying to reproduce the FST results from the Hapmap 3 paper (The International HapMap Consortium. A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature 449, 851-861. 2007) and they don't seem to be using the formula provided here. I believe they're using |
I'm trying to reproduce the FST results from the Hapmap 3 paper (The International HapMap Consortium. A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature 449, 851-861. 2007) and they don't seem to be using the formula provided here. I believe they're using as defined by Reynolds, Weir, and Cockerham [Reynolds, John, Weir, B., S., Cockerham, C. Clark, ESTIMATION OF THE COANCESTRY COEFFICIENT: BASIS FOR A SHORT-TERM GENETIC DISTANCE, Genetics 1983 105: 767-779] which is also somewhat complicated. Perhaps this page should just include a simple FST formula, such as would be found in a standard population genetics textbook. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/192.12.88.17|192.12.88.17]] ([[User talk:192.12.88.17|talk]]) 00:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
This article notes that "Across the autosomes, FST was estimated to be 0.12." but it would be nice to know what this means: Is that large, or small? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tim bates|Tim bates]] ([[User talk:Tim bates|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tim bates|contribs]]) 11:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
This article notes that "Across the autosomes, FST was estimated to be 0.12." but it would be nice to know what this means: Is that large, or small? <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tim bates|Tim bates]] ([[User talk:Tim bates|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tim bates|contribs]]) 11:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 00:34, 17 October 2010
Statistics Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
I'm trying to reproduce the FST results from the Hapmap 3 paper (The International HapMap Consortium. A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature 449, 851-861. 2007) and they don't seem to be using the formula provided here. I believe they're using θ as defined by Reynolds, Weir, and Cockerham [Reynolds, John, Weir, B., S., Cockerham, C. Clark, ESTIMATION OF THE COANCESTRY COEFFICIENT: BASIS FOR A SHORT-TERM GENETIC DISTANCE, Genetics 1983 105: 767-779] which is also somewhat complicated. Perhaps this page should just include a simple FST formula, such as would be found in a standard population genetics textbook. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.12.88.17 (talk) 00:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
This article notes that "Across the autosomes, FST was estimated to be 0.12." but it would be nice to know what this means: Is that large, or small? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim bates (talk • contribs) 11:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
The 0.12 is a high value and represent populations of high variations (Asian and African origin HapMap populstions). The lowest range in the same HapMAp paper was 0.07. Dr. Rehab Abdel-Rahman —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.242.172.165 (talk) 03:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)