Jump to content

Andrew Joseph Galambos: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
CohesionBot (talk | contribs)
m Disambiguation link repair, repairing links to: Freedom
No edit summary
Line 117: Line 117:
[[Category:1924 births]]
[[Category:1924 births]]
[[Category:1997 deaths]]
[[Category:1997 deaths]]
[[Category:American libertarians]]
[[Category:Copyright scholars]]
[[Category:Copyright scholars]]

Revision as of 19:02, 19 May 2009

Andrew Joseph Galambos (born Joseph Andrew Galambos, Jr., 1924, in Hungary; died April 10, 1997) created a theory of freedom. He was most famous for his strict stances on intellectual property rights.[1] Galambos distinguished his theory from that of Ludwig von Mises (1949), Human Action, and sought to refute it. [2]

Early career

Galambos moved to Los Angeles in 1952 to work for North American Aviation. Later, in 1958, he worked for Ramo-Wooldridge Corporation, which later became TRW Space Technology Laboratories.[3]

Academia

Around 1960, Galambos left the aerospace industry to teach at Whittier College. In 1961, Galambos met with Ayn Rand, Ludwig von Mises, Leonard Read, Murray Rothbard, and Henry Hazlitt in New York. He also established The Free Enterprise Institute that year, which gave for-pay lectures on freedom and capitalism.[4]

Intellectual property

Galambos felt that intellectual property owners should have primary control over their own ideas and over how others might secondarily use those ideas. According to Galambos, all forms of property came from a combination of "primordial property" (a person's life)[5] and "primary property" (a person's own ideas).[6] By using the natural resources available in the physical universe, individuals use their primordial property, guided by primary property (actions, guided by ideas, respectively) to create "secondary property".[7][8] That which Galambos denotes as "secondary property" are the well-known, established, goods and services which individuals trade, use, and consume as they live their lives. But Galambos notes that before those well-known goods and services became established, they had to be first conceived, discovered, or recognized by their primary owners. These acts of conception, discovery, or recognition Galambos denotes as the "primary property" of the individual, original owners.

Some of Galambos' students were required to acknowledge a "proprietary notice" which asked those students to give credit (both intellectually and financially) for the information gleaned from his courses; later he required that all participants in his lectures sign a non-disclosure agreement to prevent publication of his ideas before he published them himself. Students were allowed to take notes for their private use and most lectures were taped. Course V-50T (the "T" was for Tape) was transcribed and published as Sic Itur Ad Astra (see below). Another course, V-201, which focused on mechanisms for intellectual property protection for inventors, also had a taped version, which is expected to be transcribed into future volumes.

V-50T and V-201T are occasionally offered as taped courses by The Free Enterprise Institute.

Since his father's name was Joseph Andrew Galambos, Galambos changed his name from Joseph Andrew Galambos, Jr., to Andrew Joseph Galambos, so that he wouldn't infringe on his father's property right in the name Joseph Andrew Galambos.[9]

Galambos also dropped a nickel into a fund box[10] every time[citation needed] he said the word "Liberty," as a royalty to the descendants of Thomas Paine, who invented the term.[11]

In 1998, volume one of Sic Itur Ad Astra ("This is the Way to the Stars") (ISBN 0-88078-004-5) was first published. The book is based on a course entitled "Course V-50, The Theory of Volition," Galambos gave at The Free Enterprise Institute in 1968. In the lectures which form the basis for the book, Galambos laid out his two postulates of volitional science,

  • "Postulate Number One: All volitional beings live to pursue happiness,"[12] and
  • "Postulate Number Two: All concepts of happiness pursued through moral action are equally valid."[13]

Galambos equates immoral action with coercion[14][15] and defines freedom as "the societal condition wherein every individual has one hundred percent control over his own property",[16][17] Galambos derives his theory from these postulates. The remainder of the course (and the book) consists of Galambos' elaboration of the theory and his application of that science to solve the problems of modern society.

Liberal viewpoint

Originally a Republican supporting Barry Goldwater, Galambos later became a classical liberal.[18] He supported private protection and defense, the absolute rights of the owner of private property, and was opposed to political voting and other forms of political activism.

End of life

In the 1980s, Galambos was diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease and was institutionalized in 1990. He died on April 10, 1997.

Notes

  1. ^ Galambos 1998 p.73 property is the most fundamental parameter of volitional science, where volition refers to the act of choosing (p. 11).
  2. ^ Galambos 1998 pp.198-199 Galambos emphasized that von Mises failed to cover the production and marketing of intellectual property, that is, Primary Property, as noted in this article.
  3. ^ Browne 1997
  4. ^ Browne 1997
  5. ^ Galambos 1998, p. 23
  6. ^ Galambos 1998, pp. 39, 52, 84, 92, 93, 153, 201, 326.
  7. ^ Galambos 1998, pp. 104, 201, 326
  8. ^ Galambos 1998, p. 671 notes that land cannot be owned, whereas the rights and claims of access to land, and use of land is secondary property
  9. ^ Kinsella 2006
  10. ^ Kinsella 2006 Resources on Galambos from an opposing viewpoint. From the Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  11. ^ http://mises.org/books/against.pdf
  12. ^ Galambos 1998, p. 96, also called the Pursuit of Happiness Postulate, p. 745
  13. ^ Galambos 1998, phraseology from p. 756, also called this the Moral Postulate
  14. ^ Galambos 1998, p. 78
  15. ^ Galambos 1998, p. 633 notes that a contract, or "voluntary agreement between two or more people" is a proper alternative to coercion
  16. ^ Galambos 1998, p. 115
  17. ^ Thus making the enslavement of others immoral by definition.
  18. ^ Galambos 1998, pp. 874-875 "The point at which CONSERVATISM becomes destructive is when it employs coercion to stifle the acceptance of a new idea."

Sources

  • Galambos, Andrew (1998), [[Sic itur ad astra]]: This is the way to the stars, vol. Volume One - The Theory of Volition, San Diego, California: The Universal Scientific Publications Company, Inc., ISBN 0-88078-004-5 {{citation}}: |volume= has extra text (help); URL–wikilink conflict (help).
  • Browne, Harry (1997), Andrew Galambos — the Unknown Libertarian, retrieved 2009-04-02.
  • Kinsella, Stephan (2006), Galambos and Other Nuts, retrieved 2009-04-02.
  • Kinsella, Stephan (2001), Against Intellectual Property (PDF), retrieved 2009-04-02.
  • Brian Doherty. Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement (2007)

See also