User talk:Slashme: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:26, 30 May 2007

Please leave messages here

You can leave a message for me using the "+" tab at the top of the page (also known as action=edit section=new)

Just wanted to say thanks

for cleaning up the dubious info in melamine. I should have been more bold, but I'm actually quite a noob to wiki, and am a bit conflict averse as well, and didn't want to get into edit wars with dubious theorists. Abby Kelleyite 12:07, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help (full response on User_talk:AbbyKelleyite) --Slashme 15:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Convection

Yesterday i added the comparism to diffusion in the article about convection. You edited my add. You 're right, "internal force" is misleading and "brownian motion" ist the correct discription of the physical process. But you also edited the term "caused by an external force such as gravity or heating" by "convection is a relatively large-scale effect, involving bulk fluid motion." I think yor 're right with the discription "how convection looks like" but you deleted what is the REASON for convection, and I think the reason is a (macroscopic) external force due to gravity, pressure difference, temperature difference and so on. For example in fuel cells technology forcing a liquid to move through a porous media is denoted by convection. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.187.5.225 (talk) 08:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Discussion continued at Talk:Convection --Slashme 10:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User Category for Discussion

A category created by you or to which you have significantly contributed is being considered for deletion, rename, move or merge in accordance with Wikipedia's Categories for Discussion policies . This does not mean that any of the userpages in the category will be deleted. They may, however, be recategorized.
Please share your thoughts on the matter at this category's entry on the User categories for discussion page.
VegaDark (talk) 07:49, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MetsBot flagging of Image:FlattenedRoundPills.jpg

I see your bot flagged Image:FlattenedRoundPills.jpg as possibly not meeting the requirements for deletion, but the source info on Commons looks OK to me. What gives? (Please respond by email or on my talk page, as I might miss responses here.) --Slashme 07:53, 30 May 2007 (UTC) MetsBot was unable to determine if this image has proper source information on Commons.[reply]

It's actually good. Note that the message reads "MetsBot was unable to determine if this image has proper source information on Commons." This does not mean that it's incorrect, simply that the bot couldn't tell. —METS501 (talk) 20:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the welcome, and yes, I indeed love the user box. I use Windows because it's convenient and a whole lot easier, at least for the time being. Cool user page, it reminded me that I need to learn how to play 'Go'. Unchain 23:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 MetsBot was unable to determine if this image has proper source information on Commons.
 :It's actually good.  Note that the message reads "MetsBot was '''unable to determine''' if this image has proper source information on Commons."  This does not mean that it's incorrect, simply that the bot couldn't tell. —<span style="color: red;">[[User:Mets501|M<small>ETS</small>501]] ([[User talk:Mets501|talk]])</span> 20:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
+== Thanks ==
+Thanks for the welcome, and yes, I indeed love the user box. I use Windows because it's convenient and a whole lot easier, at least for the time being. Cool user page, it reminded me that I need to learn how to play 'Go'. [[User:Unchain|Unchain]] 23:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)