Talk:RevoPower/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
close GAR Talk:RevoPower/GA1 as delist (GANReviewTool) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==GA Reassessment== |
==GA Reassessment== |
||
{{atopr |
|||
| result = Consensus to delist in 2009. [[User:AirshipJungleman29|~~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 23:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC) |
|||
}} |
|||
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:RevoPower/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This discussion is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:RevoPower/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''</includeonly> |
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:RevoPower/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This discussion is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:RevoPower/GA1]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''</includeonly> |
||
<!-- Please add all reassessment comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the discussion within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the reassessment. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
<!-- Please add all reassessment comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the discussion within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the reassessment. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
||
| Line 16: | Line 19: | ||
:(Original Creator:) Thank you. Due to time (the original site, as you mention) and poor contributions since I left the project, it is not the article it once was. I fully agree that the article needs work, and hopefully your reclassification will spur someone on to do it. --<span style="font-variant:small-caps">'''[[User:Lucid|lucid]]'''</span> 20:32, 5 November 2009 (UTC) |
:(Original Creator:) Thank you. Due to time (the original site, as you mention) and poor contributions since I left the project, it is not the article it once was. I fully agree that the article needs work, and hopefully your reclassification will spur someone on to do it. --<span style="font-variant:small-caps">'''[[User:Lucid|lucid]]'''</span> 20:32, 5 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
{{abot}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 23:24, 23 February 2023
GA Reassessment
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been listed as a good article in October 2007, and has since been overseen by the cycling project. While I personally don't think it is notable, there have been some newsitems about it that are included in the article. But the quality of the article is not Good; It is rated as C-class, which I think is a better assessment of the quality.
Some examples:
- "Steve Katsaros, the creator of the Wheel". I am sure that this Steve did not invent the wheel. Maybe the RevoPower, but this should be phrased differently.
- "... have led to speculation that the product is a scam". Maybe, but I am sure that this needs to be sourced to be included in Wikipedia.
- "Some speculated there were technical problems with the design". Here too, a source is needed.
- Because the company website is no longer online, four of the nine references do not work anymore.
The creator of the article has left Wikipedia, so I can not notify him/her. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 07:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- (Original Creator:) Thank you. Due to time (the original site, as you mention) and poor contributions since I left the project, it is not the article it once was. I fully agree that the article needs work, and hopefully your reclassification will spur someone on to do it. --lucid 20:32, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.