skip to main content
short-paper

Assessing Realism in Simulated Work Tasks

Published: 14 March 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we describe our use of realism check questions in an exit questionnaire as a method for assessing the realism of scenarios and simulated tasks. We used realism check questionnaire items found in the decision-making literature to assess the realism of the scenario and tasks (i.e., simulated work task scenarios) used as part of a broader study of decision-making. The realism check results indicated that participants could imagine themselves in the scenario (i.e., making recommendations for a friend) and could imagine making recommendations like the ones in the study. The findings suggest that realism check questions are a relatively low effort method to assess the realism of simulated work task scenarios used in an interactive information retrieval study. Future research is needed to understand the relationship between realism and other important factors in IIR studies (e.g., topic interest or prior knowledge, search behaviors).

References

[1]
Roy F. Baumeister and Kathleen D. Vohs. 2007. Ecological validity. Vol. 1. SAGE Publications, Inc., 276–276. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956253.n167
[2]
Roy F. Baumeister and Kathleen D. Vohs. 2007. Experimental realism. Vol. 1. SAGE Publications, Inc., 329–330. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956253.n202
[3]
Roy F. Baumeister and Kathleen D. Vohs. 2007. Mundane realism. Vol. 1. SAGE Publications, Inc., 599–600. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956253.n357
[4]
Pia Borlund. 2003. The IIR evaluation model: A framework for evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Information Research 8, 3 (2003), 1–34. http://informationr.net/ir/8-3/paper152.html
[5]
Pia Borlund. 2016. A study of the use of simulated work task situations in interactive information retrieval evaluations. Journal of Documentation 72, 3 (2016), 394–413. https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-06-2015-0068
[6]
Robert Capra, Jaime Arguello, and Yinglong Zhang. 2017. The effects of search task determinability on search behavior. In Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2017., Joemon M Jose, Claudia Hauff, I Sengor Altingovde, Dawei Song, Dyaa Albakour, Stuart Watt, and John Tait (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10193. Springer International Publishing, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56608-5_9
[7]
Anita Crescenzi. 2019. Adaptation in information search and decision-making under time pressure. Ph.D. Dissertation. https://doi.org/10.17615/YT6K-AC37
[8]
Anita Crescenzi, Rob Capra, Bogeum Choi, and Yuan Li. 2021. Adaptation in information search and decision-making under time constraints. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval(CHIIR ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406522.3446030
[9]
Pratibha A. Dabholkar. 1994. Incorporating choice into an attitudinal framework: Analyzing models of mental comparison processes. Journal of Consumer Research 21, 1 (1994), 100. https://doi.org/10.1086/209385
[10]
Diane Kelly, Jaime Arguello, Ashlee Edwards, and Wan-Ching Wu. 2015. Development and evaluation of search tasks for IIR experiments using a cognitive complexity framework. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval(ICTIR ’15). ACM Press, New York, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/2808194.2809465
[11]
Diane Kelly and Cassidy R. Sugimoto. 2013. A systematic review of interactive information retrieval evaluation studies, 1967-2006. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, 4 (2013), 745–770. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22799
[12]
William R. Shadish, Thomas D. Cook, and Donald T. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton, Mifflin and Company, New York. 623 pages.
[13]
Elaine G. Toms, Robert Villa, and Lori McCay-Peet. 2013. How is a search system used in work task completion?Journal of Information Science 39, 1 (2013), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551512469929
[14]
Barbara Wildemuth and Luanne Freund. 2009. Search tasks and their role in studies of search behaviors. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval (HCIR ’09)(Washington, DC).
[15]
Barbara M. Wildemuth, Luanne Freund, and Elaine G. Toms. [n.d.]. Repository of Assigned Search Tasks (RepAST). https://ils.unc.edu/searchtasks/
[16]
Timothy D. Wilson, Elliot Aronson, and Kevin Carlsmith. 2010. The art of laboratory experimentation.John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 51–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001002

Index Terms

  1. Assessing Realism in Simulated Work Tasks
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHIIR '22: Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval
      March 2022
      399 pages
      ISBN:9781450391863
      DOI:10.1145/3498366
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 14 March 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. experimental design
      2. interactive information retrieval
      3. realism
      4. scenario
      5. simulated work task scenario
      6. tasks

      Qualifiers

      • Short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      CHIIR '22
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 55 of 163 submissions, 34%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 172
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)51
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 23 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media