skip to main content
research-article

Pros and Cons of Rotating Scrum Master Role: A Qualitative Study

Published: 09 February 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Scrum has become a very popular software development methodology in recent years. In scrum teams, often the scrum master role is not a full time. Typically, a scrum master either contributes to multiple projects or shares the development effort along with other team members. In this latter situation, it is possible to fix a scrum master for the entire duration of the project or to rotate the responsibility among the team members. Though some practitioners and researchers suggested possible benefits from scrum master role rotation, there are no empirical studies reported in this regard. This paper summarizes perceptions of members of several teams who worked on projects following scrum methodology. As part of a quasi-experiment half of these teams of students of a software engineering course had their scrum master rotated after each sprint, and other half of these teams had a fixed scrum master for the entire project duration. This paper compares perceptions of various team members regarding the pros and cons of rotating the role of scrum master.

References

[1]
Dybå, Tore, and TorgeirDingsøyr. "Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review." Information and software technology 50.9 (2008): 833--859.
[2]
Schwaber, Ken, and Mike Beedle. Agile software development with Scrum. Vol. 1. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2002.
[3]
Rising, Linda, and Norman S. Janoff. "The Scrum software development process for small teams." IEEE software 17.4 (2000): 26--32.
[4]
Singh, Mona. "U-SCRUM: An agile methodology for promoting usability." Agile, 2008. AGILE 08. Conference. IEEE, 2008.
[5]
Mahnic, Viljan. "A capstone course on agile software development using Scrum." IEEE Transactions on Education 55.1 (2012): 99--106.
[6]
Malone, Michael W. Process subversion in Agile Scrum software development: A phenomenological approach. Diss. Capella University, 2014.
[7]
Pinto, Jeffrey K. "Project management 2002." Research-Technology Management 45.2 (2002): 22--37.
[8]
Boehm, Barry, and Richard Turner. "Management challenges to implementing agile processes in traditional development organizations." IEEE software 22.5 (2005): 30--39.
[9]
Ceschi, Martina, et al. "Project management in plan-based and agile companies." IEEE software 22.3 (2005): 21--27.
[10]
Paasivaara, Maria, Sandra Deresiewicz, and Casper Lassenius. "Using scrum in distributed agile development: A multiple case study." Global Software Engineering, 2009. IGCSE 2009. Fourth IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2009.
[11]
Cervone, H. Frank. "Understanding agile project management methods using Scrum." OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives 27.1 (2011): 18--22.
[12]
Schatz, Bob, and Ibrahim Abdelshafi. "Primavera gets agile: a successful transition to agile development." IEEE software 22.3 (2005): 36--42.
[13]
Mundra, Ashish, Sanjay Misra, and Chitra A. Dhawale. "Practical scrum-scrum team: Way to produce successful and quality software." Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA), 2013 13th International Conference on. IEEE, 2013.
[14]
Lindvall, Mikael, et al. "Empirical findings in agile methods." Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Methods. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002.
[15]
Danait, Ajay. "Agile offshore techniques-a case study." Agile Conference, 2005. Proceedings. IEEE, 2005.
[16]
Hammarin, Gabriella Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Information Technology.
[17]
"Why Scrum? | State of Scrum Report - Scrum Alliance." Accessed September 24,2017. https://www.scrumalliance.org/why-scrum/state-of-scrum-report/2017-state-of-scrum.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Improving the Performance of Student Teams in Project-Based Learning with ScrumEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1108044411:8(444)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2021

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ISEC '18: Proceedings of the 11th Innovations in Software Engineering Conference
February 2018
154 pages
ISBN:9781450363983
DOI:10.1145/3172871
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • iSOFT: iSOFT

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 February 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Agile project management
  2. Empirical Study
  3. Qualitative study
  4. Scrum master

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ISEC '18

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 76 of 315 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)129
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 22 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Improving the Performance of Student Teams in Project-Based Learning with ScrumEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1108044411:8(444)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2021

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media