Abstract
In the present paper, we apply psychological approach for impression, perception and aesthetics evaluations of public display design considering its competing business context. In designing of approach, we developed questionnaires and two versions of data collection methods with application guidelines. The approach was developed for practitioners, thus it included deep consideration about managerial limitations (e.g., time, cost, skill/knowledge needed for implementation). The proposed approach, which was simple and could be carried out easily, was applied to our case study where three platform displays’ evaluations were carried out. Results of evaluations as well as implications are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Noble, C.H., Kumuar, M.: Using product design strategically to create deeper consumer connections. Bus. Horiz. 51(5), 441–450 (2008)
Mania, K., Robinson, A.: The effect of quality of rendering on user lighting impressions and presence in virtual environment. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGGRAPH, pp. 200–205, June 2004
Tractinsky, N., Katz, A.S., Ikar, D.: What is beautiful is usable. Interact. Comput. 13, 127–145 (2000)
Osgood, C.E., Sugi, G.J., Tannenbaum, P.H.: The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1957)
Ouellette, M.J.: Exit signs in smoke: design parameters for greater visibility. Light. Res. Technol. 20(4), 155–160 (1988)
Schooley, L.C., Reagan, J.A.: Visibility and legibility of exit signs, Part II: experimental results. J. Illum. Eng. Soc. 10(1), 29–32 (1980)
Collins, B.L., Dahir, M.S., Madrzykowski, D.: Visibility and exit signs in clear and smoky conditions. Fire Technol. 29, 154–182 (1993)
Lavie, T., Tractinsky, N.: Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 60(3), 269–298 (2004)
Mantiuk, R., Tomaszewska, A., Mantiuk, R.: Comparison of four subjective methods for image quality assessment. Comput. Graphics Forum 31(8), 2478–2491 (2012)
Recommendation ITU-R BT. 500-11, Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures (2012)
Recommendation ITU-T P. 910, Subjective Video Quality Assessment Methods for Multimedia Applications (2008)
Zhang, Z., Zhau, J., Liu, N., Gu, X., Zhang, Y.: An improved pairwise comparison scaling method for subjective image quality assessment. In: IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB), Cagliari, pp. 1–6 (2017)
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by FUJIFILM Imaging Systems Co., Ltd. We would like to acknowledge Moriya Hagikubo, Kei-ichi Ikejima, Shuhei Uemura, Shinji Nagahara, FUJIFILM Imaging Systems Co., Ltd. and Kaitaro Hasegawa, Naoto Koizumi, Tokyo Institute of Technology, for their great supports for our study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Aoki, H. (2021). Practical Evaluation of Impression and Aesthetics for Public Displays: A Case Study in Evaluation of Platform Display Design. In: Ayaz, H., Asgher, U., Paletta, L. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80285-1_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80285-1_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80284-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80285-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)