Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of 3D Plant Modeling Systems Based on Low-Cost 2D LiDAR and Kinect

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pattern Recognition (MCPR 2021)

Abstract

Morphological information of plants is an essential resource for different agricultural machine vision applications, which can be obtained from 3D models through reconstruction algorithms. Three dimensional modeling of a plant is an XYZ spatial representation used to determine its physical parameters from, for example, a point cloud. Currently two low-cost methods have gained popularity in terms of 3D object reconstructions in 360\(^{\circ }\) employing rotating platforms, based on 2D LiDAR and Kinect. In this paper, these two techniques are compared by getting a 3D model of a Dracaena braunii specie and evaluating their performance. The results are shown in terms of their accuracy and time consumption using a Kinect V1 and a LiDAR URG-04LX-UG01, a well-performance low-cost scanning rangefinder from Hokuyo manufacturer. In terms of error calculation, the Kinect-based system probed to be more accurate than the LiDAR-based, with an error less than 20% in all plant measurements. In addition, the point cloud density reached with Kinect was approximately four times higher than with LiDAR. But, acquisition and processing time was about twice than LiDAR system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Corti, A., Giancola, S., Mainetti, G., Sala, R.: A metrological characterization of the Kinect V2 time-of-flight camera. Robot. Autonomous Syst. 75, 584–594 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Guo, Q., et al.: Crop 3D—a LiDAR based platform for 3D high-throughput crop phenotyping. Sci. China Life Sci. 61, 328–339 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, D., et al.: An overlapping-free leaf segmentation method for plant point clouds. IEEE Access 7, 129054–129070 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, J., et al.: Experiments and analysis of close-shot identification of on-branch citrus fruit with realsense. Sensors 18(5) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. McCormick, R.F., Truong, S.K., Mullet, J.E.: 3D sorghum reconstructions from depth images identify QTL regulating shoot architecture. Plant Physiol. 172(2), 823–834 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Murcia, H.F., Monroy, M.F., Mora, L.F.: 3D scene reconstruction based on a 2D moving LiDAR. In: Florez, H., Diaz, C., Chavarriaga, J. (eds.) ICAI 2018. CCIS, vol. 942, pp. 295–308. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01535-0_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Panjvani, K., Dinh, A.V., Wahid, K.A.: LiDARPheno - a low-cost LiDAR-based 3D scanning system for leaf morphological trait extraction. Front. Plant Sci. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paulus, S.: Measuring crops in 3D: using geometry for plant phenotyping (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosell-Polo, J.R., et al.: Advances in structured light sensors applications in precision agriculture and livestock farming. Adv. Agron. 133, 71–112 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saeys, W., et al.: Estimation of the crop density of small grains using LiDAR sensors. Biosyst. Eng. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Santos, T.T., Koenigkan, L.V., Barbedo, J.G.A., Rodrigues, G.C.: 3D plant modeling: Localization, mapping and segmentation for plant phenotyping using a single hand-held camera. In: Agapito, L., Bronstein, M., Rother, C. (eds.) ECCV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8928. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16220-1_18

  12. Spoliansky, R., et al.: Development of automatic body condition scoring using a low-cost 3-dimensional kinect camera. J. Dairy Sci. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thapa, S., Zhu, F., Walia, H., Yu, H., Ge, Y.: A novel LiDAR-Based instrument for high-throughput, 3D measurement of morphological traits in maize and sorghum. Sensors (Switzerland) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, H., Lin, Y., Wang, Z., Yao, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, L.: Validation of a low-cost 2D laser scanner in development of a more-affordable mobile terrestrial proximal sensing system for 3D plant structure phenotyping in indoor environment. Comput. Electron. Agric. 140, 180–189 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yamamoto, S., et al.: 3D reconstruction of apple fruits using consumer-grade RGB-depth sensor. Eng. Agric. Environ. Food 11(4), 159–168 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, L., Grift, T.E.: A LIDAR-based crop height measurement system for Miscanthus giganteus. Comput. Electron. Agric. 85, 70–76 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou, Q.Y., Park, J., Koltun, V.: Open3D: A modern library for 3D data processing. arXiv:1801.09847 (2018)

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was funded by the OMICAS program: Optimización Multiescala In-silico de Cultivos Agrícolas Sostenibles (Infraestructura y validación en Arroz y Caña de Azúcar), anchored at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Cali and funded within the Colombian Scientific Ecosystem by The World Bank, the Colombian Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, the Colombian Ministry of Education, the Colombian Ministry of Industry and Tourism, and ICETEX, under grant FP44842-217-2018 and OMICAS Award ID: 792-61187.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harold Murcia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Murcia, H., Sanabria, D., Méndez, D., Forero, M.G. (2021). A Comparative Study of 3D Plant Modeling Systems Based on Low-Cost 2D LiDAR and Kinect. In: Roman-Rangel, E., Kuri-Morales, Á.F., Martínez-Trinidad, J.F., Carrasco-Ochoa, J.A., Olvera-López, J.A. (eds) Pattern Recognition. MCPR 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12725. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77004-4_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77004-4_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77003-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77004-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics