Skip to main content

Why Does Interactional Unfairness Matter for Patient-Doctor Relationship Quality in Online Health Consultation? The Contingencies of Professional Seniority and Disease Severity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Health (ICSH 2018)

Abstract

The development of online health platforms in recent years has drawn significant research attention to understanding patient participation. However, the unfairness in patient–doctor relationship development has been largely overlooked in the online health context. This study proposes and tests a model that examines how interactional unfairness (encompassing interpersonal unfairness and informational unfairness) influences online patient–doctor relationship quality and the contingent conditions of a doctor’s professional seniority and disease severity on the unfairness–relationship quality link. Using objective data with 31,521 observations from a leading online health platform, this study employed rare-event logistic regression to test the model. The results show that interpersonal unfairness and informational unfairness have negative and positive effects on relationship quality, respectively, and a doctor’s professional seniority and disease severity moderate the strength of the unfairness-relationship quality link. This study advances the knowledge of interactional unfairness in online health, and provides practical insights for online healthcare stakeholders into how to manage unfairness and consider the contingent factors to improve patient–doctor relationship in online health consultations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Onotai, L.O., Ibekwe, U.: The perception of patients of doctor-patient relationship in otorhinolaryngology clinics of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH) Nigeria. Port. H. Med. J. 6, 65–73 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Venkatesh, V., Zhang, X., Sykes, T.A.: “Doctors do too little technology”: a longitudinal field study of an electronic healthcare system implementation. Inf. Syst. Res. 22(3), 523–546 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duan, G., Qiu, L., Yu, W., Hu, H.: Outpatient service quality and doctor-patient relationship: a study in Chinese public hospital. Int. J. Serv., Econ. Manag. 6(1), 97–111 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vick, S., Scott, A.: Agency in health care. Examining patients’ preferences for attributes of the doctor–patient relationship. J. Health Econ. 17(5), 587–605 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pilnick, A., Dingwall, R.: On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction: a critical review. Soc. Sci. Med. 72(8), 1374–1382 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beckman, H.B., Markakis, K.M., Suchman, A.L., Frankel, R.M.: The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice: lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch. Intern. Med. 154(12), 1365–1370 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burkhardt, M.E., Brass, D.J.: Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Adm. Sci. Q. 35(1), 104–127 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klecun, E.: Transforming healthcare: policy discourses of IT and patient-centred care. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 25(1), 64–76 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rider, T., Malik, M., Chevassut, T.: Haematology patients and the internet – the use of on-line health information and the impact on the patient–doctor relationship. Patient Educ. Couns. 97(2), 223–238 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Broom, A.: Virtually he@lthy: the impact of internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qual. Health Res. 15(3), 325–345 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Sreejesh, S., Mohapatra, S.: Theoretical development and hypotheses. Mixed Method Research Design, pp. 27–46. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02687-9_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ou, C.X., Pavlou, P.A., Davison, R.: Swift guanxi in online marketplaces: the role of computer-mediated communication technologies. MIS Q. 38(1), 209–230 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Toombs, S.K.: The meaning of illness: a phenomenological approach to the patient-physician relationship. J. Med. Philos. 12(3), 219–240 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Turel, O., Connelly, C.E.: Too busy to help: antecedents and outcomes of interactional justice in web-based service encounters. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 33(4), 674–683 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cropanzano, R., Ambrose, M.L., Greenberg, J., Cropanzano, R.: Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: a monistic perspective and a research agenda. In: Advances in Organizational Justice, pp. 119–151. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Orth, U.: Secondary victimization of crime victims by criminal proceedings. Soc. Justice Res. 15(4), 313–325 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Frenkel, S.J., Li, M., Restubog, S.L.D.: Management, organizational justice and emotional exhaustion among Chinese migrant workers: evidence from two manufacturing firms. Br. J. Ind. Relat. 50(1), 121–147 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leung, K., Smith, P.B., Wang, Z., Sun, H.: Job satisfaction in joint venture hotels in China: an organizational justice analysis. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 27(5), 947–962 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuo, Y.-F., Wu, C.-M.: Satisfaction and post-purchase intentions with service recovery of online shopping websites: perspectives on perceived justice and emotions. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 32(2), 127–138 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mase, J.A., Ucho, A.: Job related tension, interactional justice and job involvement among workers of dangote cement company Gboko. Food Sci. Technol. 35(ahead), 2105–2112 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kwortnik, R.J., Han, X.: The influence of guest perceptions of service fairness on lodging loyalty in China. Cornell Hosp. Q. 52(3), 321–332 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zahra, S.A., Newey, L.R.: Maximizing the impact of organization science: theory building at the intersection of disciplines and/or fields. J. Manag. Stud. 46(6), 1059–1075 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Colquitt, J.A.: On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J. Appl. Psychol. 86(3), 386–400 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Greenberg, J.: Stealing in the name of justice: informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 54(1), 81–103 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Roch, S.G., Shanock, L.R.: Organizational justice in an exchange framework: clarifying organizational justice distinctions. J. Manag. 32(2), 299–322 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Blau, P.M.: Exchange and Power in Social Life. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gouldner, A.W.: The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 25(2), 161–178 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Oliver, R.L., Swan, J.E.: Consumer perceptions of interpersonal equity and satisfaction in transactions: a field survey approach. J. Mark. 53(2), 21–35 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Arrow, K.J.: Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am. Sociol. Rev. 53(5), 941–973 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rochaix, L.: Information asymmetry and search in the market for physicians’ services. J. Health Econ. 8(1), 53–84 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kolstad, J.T., Chernew, M.E.: Quality and consumer decision making in the market for health insurance and health care services. Med. Care Res. Rev. 66(1), 28–52 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, Y.-R., Brockner, J., Greenberg, J.: When is it “a pleasure to do business with you?” The effects of relative status, outcome favorability, and procedural fairness. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 92(1), 1–21 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D.H., Anderson, C.: Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychol. Rev. 110(2), 265–284 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Weissfeld, J.L., Brock, B.M., Kirscht, J.P., Hawthorne, V.M.: Reliability of health belief indexes: confirmatory factor analysis in sex, race, and age subgroups. Health Serv. Res. 21(6), 777–793 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jha, S., Balaji, M.: Perceived justice and recovery satisfaction: the moderating role of customer-perceived quality. Manag. Mark. 10(2), 132–147 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Weinfurt, K.P., et al.: The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials. Cancer 98(1), 166–175 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Crosby, L.A., Evans, K.R., Cowles, D.: Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. J. Mark. 54(3), 68–81 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cooper, M.D.: Response time variations in an online search system. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 34(6), 374–380 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bies, R.J., Moag, J.S.: Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. Res. Negot. Organ. 1(1), 43–55 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shane, S.: Selling university technology: patterns from MIT. Manag. Sci. 48(1), 122–137 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lu, H.-Y., Shaw, B.R., Gustafson, D.H.: Online health consultation: examining uses of an interactive cancer communication tool by low-income women with breast cancer. Int. J. Med. Inform. 80(7), 518–528 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yan, L., Tan, Y.: Feeling blue? Go online: an empirical study of social support among patients. Inf. Syst. Res. 25(4), 690–709 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Umefjord, G., et al.: Medical text-based consultations on the internet: a 4-year study. Int. J. Med. Inform. 77(2), 114–121 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, X., Guo, X., Lai, Kh., Wu, Y. (2018). Why Does Interactional Unfairness Matter for Patient-Doctor Relationship Quality in Online Health Consultation? The Contingencies of Professional Seniority and Disease Severity. In: Chen, H., Fang, Q., Zeng, D., Wu, J. (eds) Smart Health. ICSH 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10983. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03649-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03649-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03648-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03649-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics