Abstract
The development of online health platforms in recent years has drawn significant research attention to understanding patient participation. However, the unfairness in patient–doctor relationship development has been largely overlooked in the online health context. This study proposes and tests a model that examines how interactional unfairness (encompassing interpersonal unfairness and informational unfairness) influences online patient–doctor relationship quality and the contingent conditions of a doctor’s professional seniority and disease severity on the unfairness–relationship quality link. Using objective data with 31,521 observations from a leading online health platform, this study employed rare-event logistic regression to test the model. The results show that interpersonal unfairness and informational unfairness have negative and positive effects on relationship quality, respectively, and a doctor’s professional seniority and disease severity moderate the strength of the unfairness-relationship quality link. This study advances the knowledge of interactional unfairness in online health, and provides practical insights for online healthcare stakeholders into how to manage unfairness and consider the contingent factors to improve patient–doctor relationship in online health consultations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Onotai, L.O., Ibekwe, U.: The perception of patients of doctor-patient relationship in otorhinolaryngology clinics of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH) Nigeria. Port. H. Med. J. 6, 65–73 (2012)
Venkatesh, V., Zhang, X., Sykes, T.A.: “Doctors do too little technology”: a longitudinal field study of an electronic healthcare system implementation. Inf. Syst. Res. 22(3), 523–546 (2011)
Duan, G., Qiu, L., Yu, W., Hu, H.: Outpatient service quality and doctor-patient relationship: a study in Chinese public hospital. Int. J. Serv., Econ. Manag. 6(1), 97–111 (2014)
Vick, S., Scott, A.: Agency in health care. Examining patients’ preferences for attributes of the doctor–patient relationship. J. Health Econ. 17(5), 587–605 (1998)
Pilnick, A., Dingwall, R.: On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction: a critical review. Soc. Sci. Med. 72(8), 1374–1382 (2011)
Beckman, H.B., Markakis, K.M., Suchman, A.L., Frankel, R.M.: The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice: lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch. Intern. Med. 154(12), 1365–1370 (1994)
Burkhardt, M.E., Brass, D.J.: Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Adm. Sci. Q. 35(1), 104–127 (1990)
Klecun, E.: Transforming healthcare: policy discourses of IT and patient-centred care. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 25(1), 64–76 (2016)
Rider, T., Malik, M., Chevassut, T.: Haematology patients and the internet – the use of on-line health information and the impact on the patient–doctor relationship. Patient Educ. Couns. 97(2), 223–238 (2014)
Broom, A.: Virtually he@lthy: the impact of internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qual. Health Res. 15(3), 325–345 (2005)
Sreejesh, S., Mohapatra, S.: Theoretical development and hypotheses. Mixed Method Research Design, pp. 27–46. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02687-9_3
Ou, C.X., Pavlou, P.A., Davison, R.: Swift guanxi in online marketplaces: the role of computer-mediated communication technologies. MIS Q. 38(1), 209–230 (2014)
Toombs, S.K.: The meaning of illness: a phenomenological approach to the patient-physician relationship. J. Med. Philos. 12(3), 219–240 (1987)
Turel, O., Connelly, C.E.: Too busy to help: antecedents and outcomes of interactional justice in web-based service encounters. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 33(4), 674–683 (2013)
Cropanzano, R., Ambrose, M.L., Greenberg, J., Cropanzano, R.: Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: a monistic perspective and a research agenda. In: Advances in Organizational Justice, pp. 119–151. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2001)
Orth, U.: Secondary victimization of crime victims by criminal proceedings. Soc. Justice Res. 15(4), 313–325 (2002)
Frenkel, S.J., Li, M., Restubog, S.L.D.: Management, organizational justice and emotional exhaustion among Chinese migrant workers: evidence from two manufacturing firms. Br. J. Ind. Relat. 50(1), 121–147 (2012)
Leung, K., Smith, P.B., Wang, Z., Sun, H.: Job satisfaction in joint venture hotels in China: an organizational justice analysis. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 27(5), 947–962 (1996)
Kuo, Y.-F., Wu, C.-M.: Satisfaction and post-purchase intentions with service recovery of online shopping websites: perspectives on perceived justice and emotions. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 32(2), 127–138 (2012)
Mase, J.A., Ucho, A.: Job related tension, interactional justice and job involvement among workers of dangote cement company Gboko. Food Sci. Technol. 35(ahead), 2105–2112 (2014)
Kwortnik, R.J., Han, X.: The influence of guest perceptions of service fairness on lodging loyalty in China. Cornell Hosp. Q. 52(3), 321–332 (2011)
Zahra, S.A., Newey, L.R.: Maximizing the impact of organization science: theory building at the intersection of disciplines and/or fields. J. Manag. Stud. 46(6), 1059–1075 (2009)
Colquitt, J.A.: On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J. Appl. Psychol. 86(3), 386–400 (2001)
Greenberg, J.: Stealing in the name of justice: informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 54(1), 81–103 (1993)
Roch, S.G., Shanock, L.R.: Organizational justice in an exchange framework: clarifying organizational justice distinctions. J. Manag. 32(2), 299–322 (2006)
Blau, P.M.: Exchange and Power in Social Life. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (1964)
Gouldner, A.W.: The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Am. Sociol. Rev. 25(2), 161–178 (1960)
Oliver, R.L., Swan, J.E.: Consumer perceptions of interpersonal equity and satisfaction in transactions: a field survey approach. J. Mark. 53(2), 21–35 (1989)
Arrow, K.J.: Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am. Sociol. Rev. 53(5), 941–973 (1963)
Rochaix, L.: Information asymmetry and search in the market for physicians’ services. J. Health Econ. 8(1), 53–84 (1989)
Kolstad, J.T., Chernew, M.E.: Quality and consumer decision making in the market for health insurance and health care services. Med. Care Res. Rev. 66(1), 28–52 (2009)
Chen, Y.-R., Brockner, J., Greenberg, J.: When is it “a pleasure to do business with you?” The effects of relative status, outcome favorability, and procedural fairness. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 92(1), 1–21 (2003)
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D.H., Anderson, C.: Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychol. Rev. 110(2), 265–284 (2003)
Weissfeld, J.L., Brock, B.M., Kirscht, J.P., Hawthorne, V.M.: Reliability of health belief indexes: confirmatory factor analysis in sex, race, and age subgroups. Health Serv. Res. 21(6), 777–793 (1987)
Jha, S., Balaji, M.: Perceived justice and recovery satisfaction: the moderating role of customer-perceived quality. Manag. Mark. 10(2), 132–147 (2015)
Weinfurt, K.P., et al.: The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials. Cancer 98(1), 166–175 (2003)
Crosby, L.A., Evans, K.R., Cowles, D.: Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. J. Mark. 54(3), 68–81 (1990)
Cooper, M.D.: Response time variations in an online search system. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 34(6), 374–380 (1983)
Bies, R.J., Moag, J.S.: Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. Res. Negot. Organ. 1(1), 43–55 (1986)
Shane, S.: Selling university technology: patterns from MIT. Manag. Sci. 48(1), 122–137 (2002)
Lu, H.-Y., Shaw, B.R., Gustafson, D.H.: Online health consultation: examining uses of an interactive cancer communication tool by low-income women with breast cancer. Int. J. Med. Inform. 80(7), 518–528 (2011)
Yan, L., Tan, Y.: Feeling blue? Go online: an empirical study of social support among patients. Inf. Syst. Res. 25(4), 690–709 (2014)
Umefjord, G., et al.: Medical text-based consultations on the internet: a 4-year study. Int. J. Med. Inform. 77(2), 114–121 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhang, X., Guo, X., Lai, Kh., Wu, Y. (2018). Why Does Interactional Unfairness Matter for Patient-Doctor Relationship Quality in Online Health Consultation? The Contingencies of Professional Seniority and Disease Severity. In: Chen, H., Fang, Q., Zeng, D., Wu, J. (eds) Smart Health. ICSH 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10983. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03649-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03649-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03648-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03649-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)