Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Shortcut

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
  • Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Redirects are cheap...--Eptalon (talk) 09:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redwood, California

Redwood, California (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

73.170.137.168 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unlikely redirect 73.170.137.168 (talk) 17:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. deleted by MathXplore (QD G5) –Davey2010Talk 15:01, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dainik Prantajyoti

Dainik Prantajyoti (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable --Ferien (talk) 15:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

— This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page. –Davey2010Talk 16:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 15:42, 31 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 11:44, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vitaminfood

Vitaminfood (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, no significant coverage. The article reads mostly like a promotion and most of the sources are not about the company itself, but rather about nutrition and diet. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 06:38, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 06:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 11:42, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Occams Advisory

Occams Advisory (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, whole article reads like a promotion and the award claims lack substance: none of them seem to be significant and notable awards. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 06:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • I noticed comment while researching about this company... i suggested some awards that were notable and important in the business advisory area which i look for while contacting... i feel the awards should be resolved. HARSHGolani1994 (talk) 17:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are right. Whole article looks like self promotion for links, PR. Most of those awards are pay to participate. Apennyspent (talk) 08:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete adding these sort of companies and their self advertisements are only going to dilute the trust and integrity of Wikipedia.
Should be deleted or reduced to facts only. Bornestuff (talk) 11:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This request is due to close on 06:37, 31 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 03:07, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Animaniacs theme song (missing versions)

Animaniacs theme song (missing versions) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:644:9083:5730:A5EC:3EA7:BA0F:AAE3 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Random trivia 2601:644:9083:5730:A5EC:3EA7:BA0F:AAE3 (talk) 20:18, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

— This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page. –Davey2010Talk 16:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 20:18, 30 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 03:06, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Squirrel Shock

The Squirrel Shock (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:644:9083:5730:A5EC:3EA7:BA0F:AAE3 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I didn't find any reliable references for this movie. It might be a hoax. 2601:644:9083:5730:A5EC:3EA7:BA0F:AAE3 (talk) 19:42, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

@Asteradeae: It might be a hoax. I think it's not notable. 2601:644:9083:5730:A5EC:3EA7:BA0F:AAE3 (talk) 20:04, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:42, 30 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Possibly a hoax, clearly not what people are looking for when they search 'tiny'. If recreated, needs to be a 'Tiny (movie)' or similar, and needs references.--Eptalon (talk) 09:32, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny

Tiny (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:644:9083:5730:A5EC:3EA7:BA0F:AAE3 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I didn't find any reliable references for this movie (produced by Bill Hader, directed by Mark Dindal) 2601:644:9083:5730:A5EC:3EA7:BA0F:AAE3 (talk) 19:40, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

@Asteradeae: I think it's not notable. 2601:644:9083:5730:A5EC:3EA7:BA0F:AAE3 (talk) 20:04, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Asteradeae: You haven't given any reason why this article should not be deleted. It's not notable, there are no reliable references. 2607:F140:6000:816A:94FE:9BC9:5ACD:F0CD (talk) 19:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:40, 30 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 03:05, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Montgomery

John Montgomery (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:644:9083:5730:A5EC:3EA7:BA0F:AAE3 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: He doesn't seem very notable. If we keep this, we could have articles for millions of small business owners. 2601:644:9083:5730:A5EC:3EA7:BA0F:AAE3 (talk) 19:00, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Per QD G5 and RFD MathXplore (talk) 12:10, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FlexClip

FlexClip (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable video editing tool, I found [1] and [2] but just those two alone aren't enough to build an article, there's plenty of other sources here but they're either blogs, wannabe news sites or paid-for-adverts (newswire). Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 10:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ↑ Steve, Paris (6 March 2023). "FlexClip review". TechRadar. Retrieved 23 August 2024.
  2. ↑ Muchmore, Michael. "The Best Online Video Editors for 2024". PCMAG. Retrieved 23 August 2024.

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:36, 30 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 02:58, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Soulcalibur series characters

Category:Soulcalibur series characters (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Geez. You didn't even get where I was going I guess, this category now only contains the guest characters which even ask for (and find very non-defining) and in turn we are going to delete the whole thing instead. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 02:15, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  •  Delete The characters here are mainly known for their appearances in other media, and this category is not very relevant for the articles it contains. If articles about the important characters in this series are added, the category can be restored. 73.170.137.168 (talk) 19:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete – The category is not necessary as it currently contains mostly guest characters who are more prominently known for their roles in other media. Unless articles for significant characters specific to the "Soulcalibur" series are added, the category lacks relevance and definition. Jha-Authorised4772🧿Talk 15:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
— This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page. –Davey2010Talk 16:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 02:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 03:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Batch

Batch (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Batch is not only refers to Windows Programming A1Cafel (talk) 14:34, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • As is, this us likely a delete. First it is a number of similar items, and as batch processing a chucked execution/processing of work items. That it is a programming language is rarely relevant. So likely for Wiktionary?--Eptalon (talk) 17:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete – The current content is too narrow in scope and does not adequately cover the multiple meanings of "Batch." It lacks sufficient context and relevance for an encyclopedia entry and might be more suitable for Wiktionary. Jha-Authorised4772🧿Talk 15:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
— This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page. –Davey2010Talk 16:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This request is due to close on 14:34, 29 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:22, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Shafi Deobandi

Muhammad Shafi Deobandi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability is questionable. Ternera (talk) 13:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Adedoyin

Sam Adedoyin (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

DIVINE has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The person is not notable and fails to meet the WP:BIO . The only reason I bring up this RFD is their claim of an award and notability, but this is merely an honor from a local community and a TikTok spotlight, which is not an award. DIVINE (talk) 02:45, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion


This request is due to close on 02:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Codix Pharma (2nd nomination)

Codix Pharma (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable company, Fails NCORP and GNG –Davey2010Talk 00:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

I would respectfully disagree, the majority of sources are spammy/paid-for-adverts –Davey2010Talk 23:00, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
9 different Nigerian publications. Rathfelder (talk) 21:53, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You say that like it's meant to mean something, My analysis of the sources in the last RFD still remains the same, The majority of sources are paid-for-adverts or trivial sources and saying "9 different Nigerian publications" doesn't change that - you only need to read the news piece to know this, –Davey2010Talk 22:39, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 00:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Per QD G5 and RFD MathXplore (talk) 02:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Umaima al-Baghdadi

Umaima al-Baghdadi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Alon9393 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Terrorist person not notable on Wikipedia Alon9393 (talk) 14:19, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 02:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oleksandr Klassen

Oleksandr Klassen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sura Shukurlu has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject isn't the topic of secondary reliable sources, and there is generally no significant coverage. The individual's role does not contribute to his notability, and the "Ukrainian Center" itself is not an notable institution. The only known fact about this person is his role as the director of the institution. Additionally, this article was created by the globally banned User:Memoli13, who was involved in undisclosed paid editing. He and his sockpuppet accounts have created numerous articles about "Ukrainian Center" and its founder (Mehrali Gasimov) on various wikis. The creation of this article appears to be self-promotion and very likely created through paid editing. Sura Shukurlu (talk) 21:58, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:58, 17 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Note: Not listed on RfD page, new closure date, August 27..--Eptalon (talk) 20:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 02:36, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Malikov

Ali Malikov (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Sura Shukurlu has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:N.The person has not been the direct subject of any independent reliable sources. No source has discussed the person or have significant coverage about their life and activities. The person does not have any particularly significant or distinguished activities as an activist either, so the facts in the article cannot claim to be encyclopedic.The "firsts" and other distinguishing features mentioned in the article are included merely to portray the person as notable. There is no need to investigate to learn that these are not significant and verifiable facts. Sura Shukurlu (talk) 21:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:10, 24 June 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Note: RfD wasn't listed on RfD page, I suggest this to close on August 27..--Eptalon (talk) 20:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Page redirected to the page for the shooting. Anyone who wants to merge any content can find it in the page history. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:10, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Stair

Randy Stair (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Another case of a mass-murderer, killing three others. The shooting happened in 2017, as is the Eaton Township Weis Markets shooting. The article about this person is much longer than that on the shooting. So, my big question to the community: Is this (mass-?)murderer notable? Eptalon (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:42, 27 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 02:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chronological age

Chronological age (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:644:9083:5730:EDCD:F32E:CE64:CD67 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:

This seems like a lot of words about a simple concept. I can't see why it's useful in a simple English encylopedia. 2601:644:9083:5730:EDCD:F32E:CE64:CD67 (talk) 19:21, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • First of all, thank you for publishing my article on your platform. I am very grateful for your support.
Secondly, please allow me to complete the article, and then you can decide whether to keep or delete it.
Thirdly, I would like to contribute more articles on topics that may not yet be covered on your platform, so I ask for your cooperation and assistance in this regard. I would also appreciate it if you could avoid deleting any articles, even if they are just definitions, as I plan to contribute continuously.
Thank you for your understanding and support. Raymond Dennis gray (talk) 07:23, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:21, 27 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 07:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jctrdt

Template:Jctrdt (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pppery has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Broken template (required module never imported). Sole use substituted. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 02:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 01:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gera Khatris (caste)

Gera Khatris (caste) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FatalFit has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails GNG, can’t find anything about this online at all. FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  20:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:12, 26 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 01:29, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Michaelsoft binbows

Michaelsoft binbows (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable enough for its own article. Auntof6 (talk) 18:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Soft delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peace TV Foundation

Peace TV Foundation (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

আফতাবুজ্জামান has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability is not inherited. Non-notable Bangladeshi organization. No WP:SIGCOV. At best, merge relevant info to Peace TV. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:05, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Akiva

Akiva (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable singer, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NMUSIC and GNG –Davey2010Talk 13:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  •  Keep: In my opinion, the article seems well put together, with solid and reliable references. Based on my little knowledge of Wikipedia, I see notable relevance in the article. I am convinced that this article meets the criteria for notoriety. The sources are solid, including many reliable sources, and the article is well put together. I ask user User:Davey2010 if he was too quick to classify this article as irrelevant. --Alon9393 (talk) 15:15, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This was the article prior to you asking me for my opinion and at that given time it appeared to have failed the relevant guidelines and I wasn't able to find anything myself, Some of the sources are lyrics only which should be removed but en:Kikar.co.il appears to be a reputable source so yes I would now say the subject appears to be notable however I'll let fellow editors have their say in case I've missed something. –Davey2010Talk 15:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete – I support the deletion of this page as the subject does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for musicians (NMUSIC) or the general notability guideline (GNG). While the article includes some sources, many of these are not independent or reliable enough to establish the subject's notability, such as lyrics-only sources and lesser-known sites. There is insufficient coverage in reputable, independent secondary sources that substantively discuss the artist's work or impact. Without stronger evidence of significant coverage or notability, the page does not meet the standards required for a standalone article on Wikipedia. Jha-Authorised4772🧿Talk 14:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    — This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page. –Davey2010Talk 15:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This request is due to close on 13:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. MathXplore (talk) 13:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Karan Singh (giant)

Karan Singh (giant) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Record breaker, but without significant coverage? The validity of the record is not given anywhere in the article and I cannot find any coverage of the subject that is significant or substantial. There are a lot of social media posts out there but nothing about the subject himself. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 12:45, 25 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

American Descendants of Slavery

American Descendants of Slavery (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article created in 2021, about an organization of people in the U.S. descended from former slaves. Article also exists at Enwp (en:American Descendants of Slavery). Our article has two main problems though: It consists of 2-3 unsourced sentences. Looking at the Enwp article, the size and impact of the movement is unclear, even though there seem to have been mentions in the press. Searching the internet, the EnWP article pops up quite high on the list. I propose the article be deleted, likely there's little encyclopedic relevance. What do other people think? Eptalon (talk) 08:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  •  Keep Deletion is not cleanup. You pointed out the enwp article which has sources. You could maybe grab some of those? Operator873 connect 00:32, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Now referenced. I think the enwiki article has plenty of sources that show this subject passes notability guidelines: [1][2][3][4][5] --Ferien (talk) 12:08, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep – I support keeping this page. The article is now referenced, and the subject has received sufficient coverage in reputable sources to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The English Wikipedia (EnWP) article provides numerous reliable sources that demonstrate the notability and significance of the American Descendants of Slavery movement. Instead of deletion, improving this article with content and citations from the EnWP article would address the issues raised while preserving relevant information about this organization. Jha-Authorised4772🧿Talk 15:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
— This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page. –Davey2010Talk 16:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 08:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 03:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Game (simulation)

Game (simulation) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: "Game (simulation)" - This redirect doesn't make sense and should be deleted. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 00:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 00:25, 24 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:58, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Waterford Baptist Church

Waterford Baptist Church (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Angerxiety has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable, nothing notable pops up when I searched them up. "Preying from the Pulpit" from the enwiki is about a different church. – Angerxiety! 16:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • I think this proposal for deletion was made prematurely. Waterford Baptist Church is regarded as influential to the history of Baptism in the UK and Ireland and details regarding this are being added. TabbyCoffeeCat (talk) 17:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 16:34, 23 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Per QD G5 and RFD MathXplore (talk) 02:46, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abdulrahman Abed

Abdulrahman Abed (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to pass GNG. Some of the sources are not in-depth enough to ascertain the subject's notability. A user-generated source (LinkedIn) does not establish notability either. Source 4 is not about the subject and does not explain why the subject is notable. Beyond this article I found little to no significant, independent, and in-depth coverage that would contribute to the subject's notability. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 07:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 07:46, 23 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:50, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Killer app

Killer app (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Very short article that does not have any sources and only two articles that link to it. If it doesn't actually meet the standards for deletion, then it is better of to for other editors to expand and cite this article. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 04:17, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

@Xegma This is not QD but its RFD Cactus🌵 spiky ouch 06:46, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
— This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page. –Davey2010Talk 16:04, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral - that is what i am leaning toward.--If this article is not saying anything which is untrue, then you really should think about keeping it.--I did not catch if the article says that "killer app" is a POV concept. The article does not seem to explain if being a "killer app" is a status that disappears with time.--Good luck (while i fix other articles).--Merge to other article, does not have my support for now. 2001:2020:359:8904:298A:C4BA:BD57:D0DC (talk) 15:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 04:17, 23 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 02:49, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Green Party of Alaska Presidential Nomination

2024 Green Party of Alaska Presidential Nomination (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Just Step Sideways has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This looks well referenced, but look a little closer. Most of the very few actual references are not specifically about the Alaska Greens nomination this year. Others are the Green Party itself, the campaigns of the individual candidates, Facebook, Ballotpedia, and other websites that would not be considered independent reliable sources. It isn't hard to understand why, the Green Party in Alaska hasn't gotten even 2% of the vote in presidential election in the last twenty years, and they have been disowned by the national organization. Just Step Sideways (talk) 23:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • News Articles:
https://independentpoliticalreport.com/2024/07/green-party-of-alaska-nominates-jasmine-sherman-for-2024-presidential-run/
https://www.makeasceneak.com/march-2024/openforum
https://georgemicro.univer.se/bjafromangpak24
https://georgemicro.univer.se/bjgpakdebatewin2024
LordBirdWord (talk) 21:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those are not by any means independent reliable sources. As a niche publication focused on third parties, Independent Political Report might be ok for verification, but not for notability. Make a Scene is clearly a highly partsan source and not reliable at all. George Micro appears to be an individual making somewhat childish personal observations, more of a blog than a news source. Just Step Sideways (talk) 19:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. LV✉✎ 04:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – I support the deletion of this page. While it appears well-referenced at first glance, most of the sources cited are not specifically focused on the Alaska Green Party's nomination for this year. Instead, they reference the Green Party generally, individual campaigns, or use sources like Facebook and Ballotpedia, which do not meet the standards of independent, reliable sourcing. Additionally, the Alaska Green Party's low voter turnout (consistently below 2% in presidential elections over the past two decades) and the lack of recognition by the national organization suggest that the topic does not meet the notability criteria required for a standalone Wikipedia article. Therefore, merging or deleting seems the most appropriate course of action.--Jha-Authorised4772🧿Talk 14:53, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
— This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page. –Davey2010Talk 16:07, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This request is due to close on 23:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. --Auntof6 (talk) 02:46, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

283 (number)

283 (number) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Magnolioideae has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No reference, orphan, probably taken from English Wikipedia. Maggie🌺 talk edit 16:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

My diff, explains the revert of blanking (included in the edit): https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=283_%28number%29&diff=9703957&oldid=9703786 . 2001:2020:325:D8FB:C480:5151:285A:A33A (talk) 18:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not an orphan (article), according to simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/283_(number)
, 2001:2020:325:D8FB:C480:5151:285A:A33A (talk) 18:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 16:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 02:45, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Borel Fire

Borel Fire (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Magnolioideae has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copied directly from the English Wikipedia; non-notable Maggie🌺 talk edit 15:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

— This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page. –Davey2010Talk 16:06, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This request is due to close on 15:12, 21 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to move. There is a consensus to move the following pages as a result of this RfD:

I should also note here that RfD is not a venue for moving articles, it is intended as a venue for deleting them, with merges and moves becoming suggestions if the community does not want to delete the article. In some scenarios, you can be bold and move the articles/categories yourself – although I should note moving categories is not really something you should do BOLDly due to the level of effort it takes to revert – or if you wish to initiate a move discussion, place {{movenotice}} on the article/category page and begin a new topic on the talk page. --Ferien (talk) 12:20, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Unmanned aerial vehicles

Category:Unmanned aerial vehicles (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Rathfelder has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: They are usually called drones. Wouldnt that be a simpler name? Rathfelder (talk) 15:51, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:51, 12 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  Quickly deleted as A4 by Fr33kman. 73.170.137.168 (talk) 17:48, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basketball Stars

Basketball Stars (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2601:644:9083:5730:EDCD:F32E:CE64:CD67 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason:

This article was written with promotional language and as a game guide.
2601:644:9083:5730:EDCD:F32E:CE64:CD67 (talk) 19:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:18, 27 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 02:21, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Come Home to Me (Akiva Schaffer album)

Come Home to Me (Akiva Schaffer album) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

71.202.215.54 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable 71.202.215.54 (talk) 22:49, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:49, 22 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 06:05, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asdfmovie

Asdfmovie (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FatalFit has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Can’t find any reliable sources on the topic through an internet search FatalFit | ✉ | ✓  21:43, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 06:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tony Hawk's (series) guest characters

Category:Tony Hawk's (series) guest characters (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Delete per Non-Defining. I would have grouped all categories into the same deletion nomination, but I'm just doing this instead. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 19:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 19:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.


Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion&oldid=9725402"