Driver fatigue transition prediction in highly automated driving using physiological features

F Zhou, A Alsaid, M Blommer, R Curry…�- Expert Systems with�…, 2020 - Elsevier
F Zhou, A Alsaid, M Blommer, R Curry, R Swaminathan, D Kochhar, W Talamonti, L Tijerina…
Expert Systems with Applications, 2020Elsevier
One of the main causes of traffic accidents is driver fatigue due to monotonous driving, sleep
deprivation, boredom, or a combination of these. Thus, fatigue detection systems have been
proposed to alert drivers. However, how early driver fatigue can be detected often
determines the effectiveness of the system. Traditional approaches aim to detect driver
fatigue in real time, which can be too late in many critical situations, such as the takeover
transition period in highly automated driving. Therefore, in this research, we aim to predict�…
Abstract
One of the main causes of traffic accidents is driver fatigue due to monotonous driving, sleep deprivation, boredom, or a combination of these. Thus, fatigue detection systems have been proposed to alert drivers. However, how early driver fatigue can be detected often determines the effectiveness of the system. Traditional approaches aim to detect driver fatigue in real time, which can be too late in many critical situations, such as the takeover transition period in highly automated driving. Therefore, in this research, we aim to predict the driver's transition from non-fatigue to fatigue in highly automated driving using physiological features. First, we capitalized on PERCLOS (i.e., PERcent of time the eyelids CLOSure) as the ground truth of driver fatigue. Next, we selected the most important physiological features to predict driver fatigue proactively. Finally, using these critical physiological features, we built prediction models that were able to predict the fatigue transition at least 13.8�s ahead of time using a technique called nonlinear autoregressive exogenous network. The accuracy of fatigue transition prediction was promising for highly automated driving (F1 measure�=�97.4% and 99.1% for two types of models), which demonstrated the potential of the proposed method.
Elsevier
Showing the best result for this search. See all results