Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Sep 1;274(3):441-448.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005005.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Electronic Outpatient Symptom Monitoring After Ambulatory Cancer Surgery

Andrea L Pusic  1 , Larissa K Temple  2 , Jeanne Carter  3   4   5 , Cara M Stabile  3 , Melissa J Assel  6 , Andrew J Vickers  6 , Kate Niehaus  7 , Jessica S Ancker  8 , Taylor McCready  9 , Peter D Stetson  10 , Brett A Simon  3   9   11
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Electronic Outpatient Symptom Monitoring After Ambulatory Cancer Surgery

Andrea L Pusic et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: We implemented routine daily electronic monitoring of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for 10 days after discharge after ambulatory cancer surgery, with alerts to clinical staff for worrying symptoms. We sought to determine whether enhancing this monitoring by adding immediate automated normative feedback to patients regarding expected symptoms would further improve the patient experience.

Summary of background data: PRO monitoring reduces symptom severity in cancer patients. In ambulatory cancer surgery, it reduces potentially avoidable urgent care center (UCC) visits, defined as those UCC visits without readmission.

Methods: Patients undergoing ambulatory cancer surgery (n = 2624) were randomized to receive standard PRO monitoring or enhanced feedback. The primary study outcome was UCC visits without readmission within 30 days; secondary outcomes included patient anxiety and nursing utilization.

Results: There was no significant difference in the risk of a potentially avoidable UCC visit [1.0% higher in enhanced feedback, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.2-3.1%; P = 0.12]. There were similarly no significant differences in UCC visits with readmission or readmission overall (P = 0.4 for both). Patients randomized to enhanced feedback demonstrated a quicker reduction in anxiety (P < 0.001) and required 14% (95% CI 8-19%; P < 0.001) and 10% (95% CI 5-16%, P < 0.001) fewer nursing calls over 10 and 30 days postoperatively.

Conclusions: Providing patients with feedback about symptom severity during recovery from ambulatory cancer surgery reduces anxiety and nursing workload without affecting UCC visits or readmissions. These results support wider incorporation of normative feedback in systems for routine PRO monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Nat Health Stat Rep 2009; 1–25.
    1. Hall MJ, Schwartzman A, Zhang J, et al. Ambulatory surgery data from hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers: United States, 2010. Nat Health Stat Rep 2017; 1–15.
    1. Hollenbeck BK, Dunn RL, Suskind AM, et al. Ambulatory surgery centers and outpatient procedure use among Medicare beneficiaries. Med Care 2014; 52:926–931.
    1. Gillis C, Gill M, Marlett N, et al. Patients as partners in enhanced recovery after surgery: a qualitative patient-led study. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e017002.
    1. Odom-Forren J, Wesmiller S. Managing symptoms: enhancing patients self-management knowledge and skills for surgical recovery. Semin Oncol Nurs 2017; 33:52–60.

Publication types