Use of a Self-guided Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Tool During COVID-19: Evaluation Study
- PMID: 33973856
- PMCID: PMC8168639
- DOI: 10.2196/26989
Use of a Self-guided Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Tool During COVID-19: Evaluation Study
Abstract
Background: Internet-based programs can help provide accessible and inexpensive behavioral health care to those in need; however, the evaluation of these interventions has been mostly limited to controlled trials. Data regarding patterns of use and effectiveness of self-referred, open-access online interventions are lacking. We evaluated an online-based treatment designed to address stress, depression, and conflict management, the Dartmouth PATH Program, in a freely available and self-guided format during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Objective: The primary aim is to determine users' levels of stress and depression, and the nature of problems and triggers they reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. A secondary objective is to assess the acceptability and usability of the PATH content and determine whether such a program would be useful as a stand-alone open-access resource. The final objective is understanding the high dropout rates associated with online behavioral programs by contrasting the use pattern and program efficacy of individuals who completed session one and did not return to the program with those who came back to complete more sessions.
Methods: Cumulative anonymous data from 562 individuals were analyzed. Stress triggers, stress responses, and reported problems were analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques. Scores on usability and acceptability questionnaires were evaluated using the sign test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. Mixed-effects linear modeling was used to evaluate changes in stress and depression over time.
Results: A total of 2484 users registered from April through October 2020, most of whom created an account without initiating a module. A total of 562 individuals started the program and were considered in the data analysis. The most common stress triggers individuals reported involved either conflicts with family or spouses and work or workload. The most common problems addressed in the mood module were worry, anxiousness, or stress and difficulty concentrating or procrastination. The attrition rate was high with 13% (21/156) completing the conflict module, 17% (50/289) completing session one of the mood module, and 14% (16/117) completing session one of the stress module. Usability and acceptability scores for the mood and stress modules were significantly better than average. In those who returned to complete sessions, symptoms of stress showed a significant improvement over time (P=.03), and there was a significant decrease in depressive symptoms over all time points (P=.01). Depression severity decreased on average by 20% (SD 35.2%; P=.60) between sessions one and two.
Conclusions: Conflicts with others, worry, and difficulty concentrating were some of the most common problems people used the programs to address. Individuals who completed the modules indicated improvements in self-reported stress and depression symptoms. Users also found the modules to be effective and rated the program highly for usability and acceptability. Nevertheless, the attrition rate was very high, as has been found with other freely available online-based interventions.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02726061; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02726061.
Keywords: COVID-19; acceptability; cognitive behavioral therapy; computer-based therapy; computerized cognitive behavioral therapy; depression; digital health; effectiveness; interactive media; stress; therapy; usability.
©Isadora Detweiler Guarino, Devin R Cowan, Abigail M Fellows, Jay C Buckey. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 31.05.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of a Six-Week-Long Therapist-Guided Online Therapy Versus Self-help Internet-Based Therapy for COVID-19-Induced Anxiety and Depression: Open-label, Pragmatic, Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Feb 12;8(2):e26683. doi: 10.2196/26683. JMIR Ment Health. 2021. PMID: 33512323 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability of online self-help to people with depression: users' views of MoodGYM versus informational websites.J Med Internet Res. 2014 Mar 28;16(3):e90. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2871. J Med Internet Res. 2014. PMID: 24681717 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Using the Online Psychotherapy Tool to Address Mental Health Problems in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for an Electronically Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Program.JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Dec 18;9(12):e24913. doi: 10.2196/24913. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020. PMID: 33290245 Free PMC article.
-
Acceptability of Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults: Umbrella Review.JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Jul 6;8(7):e23091. doi: 10.2196/23091. JMIR Ment Health. 2021. PMID: 34255714 Free PMC article. Review.
-
IMPRoving Outcomes for children exposed to domestic ViolencE (IMPROVE): an evidence synthesis.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Dec. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Dec. PMID: 27977089 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Acceptability of Tele-mental Health Services Among Users: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 24;24(1):1143. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18436-7. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38658881 Free PMC article.
-
Procrastination Mediates the Relationship between Problematic TikTok Use and Depression among Young Adults.J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 22;13(5):1247. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051247. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38592070 Free PMC article.
-
Research on digital tool in cognitive assessment: a bibliometric analysis.Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 23;14:1227261. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1227261. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37680449 Free PMC article.
-
An Unguided, Computerized Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention (TreadWill) in a Lower Middle-Income Country: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 26;25:e41005. doi: 10.2196/41005. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37099376 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Web-Based, Interactive, Interest-Based Negotiation Training for Managing Conflict in Isolated Environments: Opportunistic Study With an e-Survey.JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jun 9;7:e42214. doi: 10.2196/42214. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 37075233 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;62(6):617–27. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/15939839 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hirschfeld RM, Keller MB, Panico S, Arons BS, Barlow D, Davidoff F, Endicott J, Froom J, Goldstein M, Gorman JM, Marek RG, Maurer TA, Meyer R, Phillips K, Ross J, Schwenk TL, Sharfstein SS, Thase ME, Wyatt RJ. The National Depressive and Manic-Depressive Association consensus statement on the undertreatment of depression. JAMA. 1997;277(4):333–40. - PubMed
-
- Andersson G, Carlbring P, Titov N, Lindefors N. Internet interventions for adults with anxiety and mood disorders: a narrative umbrella review of recent meta-analyses. Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jul;64(7):465–470. doi: 10.1177/0706743719839381. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/31096757 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous