Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jun;21(6):571-87.
doi: 10.1002/pon.2070. Epub 2011 Oct 21.

Fear of cancer recurrence: a systematic literature review of self-report measures

Belinda Thewes  1 , Phillis Butow, Robert Zachariae, Soren Christensen, Sébastien Simard, Carolyn Gotay
Affiliations
Review

Fear of cancer recurrence: a systematic literature review of self-report measures

Belinda Thewes et al. Psychooncology. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Prior research has shown that many cancer survivors experience ongoing fears of cancer recurrence (FCR) and that this chronic uncertainty of health status during and after cancer treatment can be a significant psychological burden. The field of research on FCR is an emerging area of investigation in the cancer survivorship literature, and several standardised instruments for its assessment have been developed.

Aims: This review aims to identify all available FCR-specific questionnaires and subscales and critically appraise their properties.

Methods: A systematic review was undertaken to identify instruments measuring FCR. Relevant studies were identified via Medline (1950-2010), CINAHL (1982-2010), PsycINFO (1967-2010) and AMED (1985-2010) databases, reference lists of articles and reviews, grey literature databases and consultation with experts in the field. The Medical Outcomes Trust criteria were used to examine the psychometric properties of the questionnaires.

Results: A total of 20 relevant multi-item measures were identified. The majority of instruments have demonstrated reliability and preliminary evidence of validity. Relatively few brief measures (2-10 items) were found to have comprehensive validation and reliability data available. Several valid and reliable longer measures (>10 items) are available. Three have developed short forms that may prove useful as screening tools.

Conclusions: This analysis indicated that further refinement and validation of existing instruments is required. Valid and reliable instruments are needed for both research and clinical care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles