Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Nov;127(3):863-75.

Effects of natural intensities of visible and ultraviolet radiation on epidermal ultraviolet screening and photosynthesis in grape leaves

C A Kolb  1 , M A Käser, J Kopecký, G Zotz, M Riederer, E E Pfündel
Affiliations

Effects of natural intensities of visible and ultraviolet radiation on epidermal ultraviolet screening and photosynthesis in grape leaves

C A Kolb et al. Plant Physiol. 2001 Nov.

Abstract

Grape (Vitis vinifera cv Silvaner) vine plants were cultivated under shaded conditions in the absence of ultraviolet (UV) radiation in a greenhouse, and subsequently placed outdoors under three different light regimes for 7 d. Different light regimes were produced by filters transmitting natural radiation, or screening out the UV-B (280-315 nm), or screening out the UV-A (315-400 nm) and the UV-B spectral range. During exposure, synthesis of UV-screening phenolics in leaves was quantified using HPLC: All treatments increased concentrations of hydroxycinnamic acids but the rise was highest, reaching 230% of the initial value, when UV radiation was absent. In contrast, UV-B radiation specifically increased flavonoid concentrations resulting in more than a 10-fold increase. Transmittance in the UV of all extracted phenolics was lower than epidermal UV transmittance determined fluorimetrically, and the two parameters were curvilinearly related. It is suggested that curvilinearity results from different absorption properties of the homogeneously dissolved phenolics in extracts and of the non-homogeneous distribution of phenolics in the epidermis. UV-B-dependent inhibition of maximum photochemical yield of photosystem II (PSII), measured as variable fluorescence of dark-adapted leaves, recovered in parallel to the buildup of epidermal screening for UV-B radiation, suggesting that PSII is protected against UV-B damage by epidermal screening. However, UV-B inhibition of CO(2) assimilation rates was not diminished by efficient UV-B screening. We propose that protection of UV-B inactivation of PSII is observed because preceding damage is efficiently repaired while those factors determining UV-B inhibition of CO(2) assimilation recover more slowly.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Light conditions. A, Transmittance spectra of the teflon (1), polyester (2), and LEE 226 UV foils (3) used to modify natural sunlight to produce “vis + UVA + UVB,” “vis + UVA,” and “vis” regimes, respectively. B, Spectral irradiances under the foils, and also in the greenhouse (4, gray line).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Chromatography of phenolic compounds. HPLC analyses (unprocessed A314 versus retention time) of methanolic extracts from a greenhouse-grown leaf (0:GH), and from leaves exposed for 7 d to vis, vis + UVA, or vis + UVA + UVB conditions designated “7:vis,” “7:vis + A,” and “7:vis + A + B,” respectively, are shown. Absorbance spectra representing the peaks labeled 1 through 10 are depicted in Figure 3. Std, The internal standard, quercetin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Absorbance spectra of phenolic compounds. The absorbance spectra of chromatographically detected compounds, normalized to their long-wavelength maximum, are shown. Numbers identifying spectra refer to the peak numbers in Figure 2. The spectrum of compound 7 was indistinguishable from that of compound 8; the spectra of compounds 9 and 10 were also indistinguishable.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Concentration of phenolics during outdoor exposure. The figure depicts concentrations, normalized to leaf area, of the sum of cis- and trans-caffeoyl tartaric acid (A), and cis- and trans-coumaroyl tartaric acid (C) during exposure of grape leaves to different light conditions as defined in Figure 1. Data, normalized to leaf area, for quercetin (que1 + que2) and kaempferol (kae1 + kae2) are shown in B and D, respectively. que1 and que2 stand for HPLC peaks 7 and 8 (Fig. 2) representing different quercetin glycosides, and kae1 and kae2 correspond to peaks 9 and 10 (Fig. 2) representing different kaempferol glycosides. Here, and also in subsequent figures, triangles, squares, and diamonds symbolize data obtained under vis, vis + UVA and vis + UVA + UVB conditions, respectively. The white circles denote the initial data from greenhouse-grown vines measured immediately before outdoor exposure. For clarity, symbols of identical time intervals were slightly shifted relative to each other. Bars indicate ses of means (4 ≤ n ≤ 6). In the cases of small ses, bars are hidden by symbols. In A, vis data differed significantly those of the other treatments; in B and D, vis + UVA + UVB data differed significantly from those of the other treatments (see “Materials and Methods”).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Micrographs of a cross section from a grape leaf. The figure shows a light transmission image (A) and fluorescence images (B and C) either untreated (A and B) or ammonia treated (C) of the same cross section of a grape leaf acclimated to full sunlight. The presence of phenolic compounds in the upper epidermis is indicated by ammonia-enhanced green fluorescence (C).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Intensity of chlorophyll fluorescence excited by UV or blue-green light. Unprocessed chlorophyll fluorescence at the F0 level excited by UV-B (FUV-B), UV-A (FUV-A), and blue-green radiation (FBG) is depicted in A, B, and C, respectively. See Figure 4 for comments on symbols and error bars. In B, vis data differed significantly from those of the other treatments (see “Materials and Methods”).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Relation between epidermal screening and UV absorption of phenolics. Data of individual leaves are shown. In A and B, we plot epidermal transmittance for UV-A radiation (TUV-A) against transmittance of extracted leaf phenolics at 360 nm (T360), and epidermal UV-B transmittance (TUV-B) against transmittance of extracted leaf phenolics at 314 nm (T314), respectively (extracted phenolics correspond to peaks 1–10 in Fig. 2). In A and B, the bold line results from linear regression to solid circles, that is for T360 > 3% and T314 > 3%. In A and B, coefficients of determinations are r2 = 0.874 and r2 = 0.750, and equations resulting from regression analyses are TUV-A = 11 + 0.72 × T360 and TUV-B = 8 + 1.22 × T360, respectively. White circles (T360 or T314 < 3%) are also shown at amplified scales in inserts (ordinate, 0%–12%; abscissa, 0%–3%).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Photosynthetic parameters during exposure. Time courses of normalized variable chlorophyll fluorescence, Fv/Fm, of dark-adapted leaves and of light-saturated CO2 assimilation rate (JCO2) are shown in A and B, respectively. For both parameters, UV-B-dependent effects were calculated by subtracting mean values of vis + UVA + UVB minus mean values of vis + UVA conditions (C and D). See Figure 4 for comments on symbols and error bars. In A and B, vis + UVA + UVB data differed significantly from those of the other treatments (see “Materials and methods”).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Allen DJ, Nogués S, Baker NR (1998) Ozone depletion and increased UV-B radiation: is there a real threat to photosynthesis? J Exp Bot 1775–1788
    1. Andersson B. Thylakoid membrane dynamics in relation to light stress and photoinhibition. In: Barber B, Guerrero MG, Medrano H, editors. Trends in Photosynthesis Research. Andover, UK: Intercept Ltd; 1992. pp. 71–86.
    1. Baker NR, Nogués S, Allen DJ. Photosynthesis and photoinhibition. In: Lumsden PJ, editor. Plants and UV-B: Responses to Environmental Change. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1997. pp. 95–111.
    1. Barnes PW, Searles PS, Ballaré CL, Ryel RJ, Caldwell MM. Non-invasive measurements of leaf epidermal transmittance of UV radiation using chlorophyll fluorescence: field and laboratory studies. Physiol Plant. 2000;109:274–283.
    1. Beggs CJ, Wellmann E. Photocontrol of flavonoid biosynthesis. In: Kendrick RE, Kronenberg GHM, editors. Photomorphogenesis in Plants. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994. pp. 733–751.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources