Steward requests/Permissions: Difference between revisions

====Project name and language====
I request sysop access.
*'''Language Code:''' xx
*'''Local Request Link:''' [[xx:Project:wiki]]
*'''Local User Page:''' [[xx:User:Example]]

Thank you. ~~~~

I request bureaucrat access, since the only bureaucrat we had has quit. The vote took place here.

• Language Code: ro
• Local User Page: wiktionary:ro:Utilizator:KlaudiuMihaila

Thank you. KlaudiuMihaila 14:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done drini ^[es:] _[commons:] 14:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I request checkuser access for ro:User:Gutza.

• Language Code: ro
• Community consensus: ro:Wikipedia:Candidaţi/Checkuser/Gutza
• Local User Page: ro:User:Gutza

Thank you. — AdiJapan ☎ 15:41, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

no current requests.

I ask for steward review of nv:User:Node ue and de-sysoping of him if he persists in block evasion on the Navajo Wikipedia. This user was trolling and vandalizing articles and making legal threats and other forms of threats on the Cherokee and Navajo Wikipeedia. He was blocked on the Cherokee Wikipedia then resorted to sockpuppetry on The English Wikipedia and attempt to troll and harass admins on other Wikis. He is not a native speaker of Navajo and appears to be a interwiki troll on sites which support languages he is not fluent in. He is not responsive to reasonable dialogue. At a minimum, please de-sysop the user until his block expires. This user has been de-sysopped on other Wikipedias for admin abuse. I recommend a one month block and cool off period for this user.

• Language Code: nv
• Local Request Link: nv:User:Node ue/Incidents
• Local User Page: nv:User:Node ue

Well, I hope you guys will see this for what it is: sheer insanity. The key part of the above I would like to direct you to is that he accuses me of "block evasion" on a Wikipedia where I am a sysop. This user has harassed me since he arrived at the Navajo Wikipedia. Last time I checked, there was no rule against unblocking onesself, but he acts as if this is some sort of horrible offense. He has accused me of many things, and when I ask him for diffs and citations of policy I have broken, he simply repeats himself and tells me again that I am breaking rules. There is a good chance he will delete my responses from his "incidents" page, so if you would like to know both sides of _that_ story, you may want to check the history. --Node ue 23:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I am impressed with what you have done as a non-speaker of Dine. And yes, I do speak enough Dine to get by. I have been involved with the Dine since my childhood. I grew up in New Mexico and went to Dine ceremonies frequently as a young man. I also run a Native American Church in Utah and Ronnie Greymountain is the roadman for the Utah NAC and I spend about 2 days a week in ceremonies with the Dine (and the ceremonies are all done in Dine). You have to think in reverse with most Native Lanaugages, Dine included, even in those where noun:verb pairs are like english. That's why your sentences are somewhat akward. It's ok, we will work on it together and Ronnie will help you to learn. Dine is not as complex as Cherokee and a lot easier to learn, but its still a hard language for English speakers to master.  :-) Jmerkey 23:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note. User has reblocked themselves and agreed to a two week break. Please suspend any action on this request unless the user returns and resumes the previous activities. In two weeks, this user and myself will attempt to work together and get the Dine wikipedia up to a reasonable standard of progress. Jmerkey 23:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I request to have sysop AND checkuser permissions removed from me. Currently, that would leave a single user with checkuser permissions, but on one hand he has gained the trust of the community, by being for instance recently promoted bureaucrat and on the other hand I'll inform them about my decision and urge them to hold new elections for another checkuser.

• Language Code: ro
• Local Request Link: ro:Discuţie Utilizator:Vlad#Resignation
• Local User Page: ro:Utilizator:Vlad

Thank you. Vlad 11:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think either both should keep CU untill replacement for you has been found, either both should be removed untill new elections have been held. I leave it up to another steward to make the final decision, but I tend to think that the first option is the best. Effeietsanders 12:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As we had to deal with vandals and sockpuppets in the past, for which CU proved to be a valuable tool, it might be wise not to remove from both of us. Like I've said, I've informed the community about my decision and mentioned the need for new elections: http://ro.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Discu%C5%A3ie_Wikipedia%3ASfatul_B%C4%83tr%C3%A2nilor&diff=815697&oldid=814994 Thank you very much Effeietsanders for your help so far! --Vlad 12:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Policy is: if no 2 local checkusers, then no checkuser. So if you lose it, the other also will. However, people can still request stewards to use checkuser to help that wiki (even thought no local checkusers will exist) drini ^[es:] _[commons:] 19:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The proposal was now: leave both as CU, and remove the sysop-bit. After elections, Vlad can be replaced by the newly elected person. Effeietsanders 23:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Precisely, that was my proposal. As you can see, elections for checkuser are in progress: http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Candida%C5%A3i#Candidaturi_pentru_statutul_de_checkuser --Vlad 10:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I request sysop and bureaucrat access removal.

• Language Code: ksh
• Local User Page: ksh:User:Jüppsche
• Local User Page: ksh:User:Manes
• Local User Page: ksh:User:Helesike
• Local User Page: ksh:User:Caesius
• Local User Page: ksh:User:Düüvelskääl

Emergency: voting procedures not followed, insufficient community support.

bureaucrat promoted his closed group.--Peterretep 00:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response and subsequent debate has been moved to Requests for permission/Ripuarian Wikipedia. Bastique 18:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request sysop access to the Sámegiella Wikibooks to clean up some spam pages. This wiki does not have local sysop.

• Language Code: se
• Local Request Link: None
• Local User Page: se:b:User:Az1568

--Az1568 01:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to clean up the usual spam on this wiki. There is no local sysop. I am admin at de:, see de:Benutzer:Johannes Rohr

• Language Code: kv:
• Local Request Link: does not exist
• Local User Page: kv:Участник:Johannes Rohr

--Johannes Rohr 10:05, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done for 2 weeks, so until march 6th. guillom 12:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I request sysop access to delete several pages. The project has no administrator, and there are currently several articles that need to be deleted, including some spambot pages. I am administrator at the English Wikipedia.

• Language Code: or
• Local Request Link: does not exist
• Local User Page: or:User:ReyBrujo

Thank you. ReyBrujo 04:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done I'm granting temporary sysophood for 72 hours. I hope that is enough. If not, please let us know so that we can consider an extension. Expires on Wednesday, February 21 at 04:55 UTC. Redux 04:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I request sysop access for enabling direct transliteration like in Nepal Bhasa new: .

• Language Code: gu, as, pa
• Local user page: gu:User:Eukesh, as:User:Eukesh, pa:User:Eukesh

Thank you. Eukesh 22:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Could you explain why administrator access is required for transliteration? Do you need the import tool, for example? —{admin} Pathoschild 08:24, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I need to enter a line in monobook.js to link to the transliteration file. Thank you.--Eukesh 16:12, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it taking so long to cater this request? My tenure as an admin had finished by this duration in Dzonkha and Bod Skad when I last applied for temp. sysop there for the same purpose. Thanks.--Eukesh 00:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I request sysop access.

• Language Code: ar
• Local Request Link: don't exist
• Local User Page: alnokta

I need the admin rights to be able to use the transwiki import from Arabic wikipedia to the Arabic wikibooks..I didn't request the temporarily one because I think I will need it again.. there is no request link because there isn't a place yet prepared for rfas.. my local page is empty because I recently registered there(Arabic wikibooks)..

Thank you. Alnokta 15:35, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done for one month. Please gain community consensus with a vote or something. Effeietsanders 21:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I request sysop access.

• Language Code: mn
• Local Request Link:
• Local User Page: wikt:mn:User:Piolinfax

The site is virtually empty now and I may not have much time to spend there but I would visit it occassionally and I would clean it, keep an eye on possible vandalism and build some infrastucture, tools and basic content there as a help for future contributors unacquainted with wikis and/or wiktionaries. I am an administrator in es.wikt (wikt:es:Usuario:Piolinfax) and in nah.wikt (wikt:nah:Usuario:Piolinfax). Thanx --Piolinfax ^(@es.wikt) 14:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 13:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

You seem to be describing long-term goals, which suggests you mean to require permanent adminship — although you don't need administrator access to do most of what you've described in a non-urgent situation. In order to be granted temporary access, you need to point out a present, urgent need for you to hold the status; and propose a duration for it. If you want permanent adminship on this project, you need to gain consensus locally; we cannot grant permanent status where no community exists or where the community has not approved of the user's status. Redux 13:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not signed properly earlier. Well, I do not intend to be a permanent admin there, just to leave some easy paths for future contributors. The problem about gathering consensus is this: currently there is no community in mn.wikt yet. Maybe I will ask for support in mn.wikipedia. Thanks anyway  :) --Piolinfax ^(@es.wikt) 14:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Temporary adminship is meant to be granted to address urgent situations in projects without local administrators or where the existing admins are all inactive. If you want to start building a basic infrastructure of project-space pages, for instance, you don't need administrator tools for that. A few examples in which temporary adminship can be granted: a) there is spam or vandalism that needs to addressed (deleting inappropriate pages created by vandals, trolls and spammers, for instance); b) you need to edit the MediaWiki interface for the project (only admins can edit MediaWiki pages); c) certain, specific cleanup tasks that require admin tools, such as cleaning up redirect messes left by unexperienced users or even vandals. In all of those cases, adminship is granted only for a limited period of time, and it's usually for a few days only. Redux 13:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I request a one-week sysop access on fj.wiki to delete several pages. The project has no administrator, and there are currently several articles that need to be deleted. I am currently the administrator at the Samoan Wikipedia.

• Language Code: fj
• Local Request Link: does not exist
• Local User Page: fj:User:Jose77

Thank you very much. --Jose77 01:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done But since you only mentioned the pages to be deleted, of which I counted "only" 17, I figure a 72-hour adminship should suffice. Expires on Thursday, February 22 at 13:50 UTC. If there are other tasks that would need an administrator and that would require a longer period, please let us know, so that we can consider an extension. Redux 13:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please de sysop me. I am resigning from Bureaucrat, checkuser, and Sysop lists in ar wiki.My edit summery in my user page confirm my ID. --Tarawneh 13:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. This means that according to policy the other checkuser must be removed as well. Bastique 13:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Request pages
  • Bot access
  • Logos
  • URL blacklisting and whitelisting
  • CheckUser information
• Archives
• Administrators of Wikimedia projects: statistics on Wikimedia projects administrators
• Log of steward actions