Skip to main content

Timeline for New colors launched

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 23, 2023 at 20:25 history edited CarrottStaff CC BY-SA 4.0
Adding status-decline since we don't have any plans to update the yellow or grey colors and we are meeting our Lc60 goal.
Nov 23, 2023 at 20:23 comment added Carrott Staff Our goal is to hit a contrast value of Lc60 for text. The lighter grey does meet that standard on the yellow background. However, we've also recently switched visited vs unvisited link logic. So the lighter grey is only used for visited links (the goal being that they have less emphasis). The darker grey/black is now used for unvisited links. Hopefully this switch, helps a bit.
Oct 23, 2023 at 6:11 history edited shaedrich CC BY-SA 4.0
added 13 characters in body
Oct 23, 2023 at 3:43 history edited V2Blast CC BY-SA 4.0
added 2 characters in body
Oct 20, 2023 at 21:11 history edited CarrottStaff CC BY-SA 4.0
Reviewing issue
Oct 20, 2023 at 15:20 comment added Darryl Noakes Also reported by Sonic: meta.stackexchange.com/a/393963/946962
Oct 20, 2023 at 7:48 comment added Lundin There's bad contrast everywhere now.
Oct 19, 2023 at 19:43 history edited shaedrich CC BY-SA 4.0
Add "bug" tag
Oct 19, 2023 at 19:39 comment added zcoop98 The contrast value of ~73 Lc of that text doesn't appear to be appropriate for text that small; it should be darker, or bigger, or both... but to wizz's point there's also a semantic factor here; it would still be nice for it to be just a little higher.
Oct 19, 2023 at 19:24 comment added wizzwizz4 I think they're going for “unfocused / unactivated is light; focused / activated is dark” everywhere. Having consistent semantics is a laudable goal, but I don't see how to make it work here (especially not with the coloured background).
Oct 19, 2023 at 19:18 history answered shaedrich CC BY-SA 4.0