Enterprise: Rosetta references Rigleigh's Pleasure World as a location well known to non-human species. 107.77.80.20 14:42, February 25, 2015 (UTC)

Potential rewrite[]

I've been looking through all the sources where Wrigley's appears or is referenced. The FASA reference is by far the most "concrete" placement, but the FASA game was written before the bulk of Trek literature had been established. All of the novels and comics where the planet is seen agree that it is an actual planet, not just a hollowed-out asteroid, and the context of all of the appearances and most of the references make it a planet that is not part of the Sol system. Would it be okay if I rewrite the article to present Wrigley's as it is known in the bulk of the literature, and note the FASA data as contradictory? 90% of the literature available disagrees with FASA, even if it doesn't specify as much as FASA does. Once we get past the mid-80s -- the era when there was forced adherence to the SFC timeline, most sources ignore FASA material, and it seems wrong to try and reconcile all of these myriad later references with the FASA material when they're very clearly representing something completely different. --TimPendragon (talk) 07:03, April 3, 2020 (UTC)

I was thinking the same thing after reading your additions.--Meacott (talk) 12:40, April 4, 2020 (UTC)

I went ahead and reconfigured the background section per your recommendation.--Meacott (talk) 12:57, September 2, 2020 (UTC)