Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Acoustic Insulation Characteristics of Shell Structures: A Review

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the most of previous works through vibroacoustic performance of shell structures in past years (1957–2019). The major end is especially placed to collate the researches carried out in the area of power transmission through shell structures during the last 60 years. For this purpose, a series of categories are first highlighted in order to classify the issues that should be searched. The review is then directed with emphasis on the kinds of shells with different geometries containing cylindrical and doubly curved shells. Later on, not only a popular discussion is proposed to model the acoustic behavior of shells based on the different theories (classical, shear deformation and three-dimensional) but also a perfect explanation is provided wherein the importance of modeling the structures according to the different materials is revealed. To extend the review, various boundary conditions (finite and infinite) are also investigated. Besides, the further effects of external environments as fluid and thermal are inspected. Since the type of incident field can be impressive on the sound insulation specification of these shells, the structure is characterized based on the various acoustic excitations involving plane wave and point source incidences. Furthermore, some descriptions on the solution procedures (analytical, experimental and numerical) are also given. As a result, the review is centralized through other matters such as control and optimization techniques in order to improve the vibroacoustic behavior of shell structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Talebitooti R, Zarastvand M, Gheibi M (2016) Acoustic transmission through laminated composite cylindrical shell employing third order shear deformation theory in the presence of subsonic flow. Compos Struct 157:95–110

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou J, Bhaskar A, Zhang X (2014) The effect of external mean flow on sound transmission through double-walled cylindrical shells lined with poroelastic material. J Sound Vib 333(7):1972–1990

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ghassabi M, Talebitooti R, Zarastvand M (2019) State vector computational technique for three-dimensional acoustic sound propagation through doubly curved thick structure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 352:324–344

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Talebitooti R, Zarastvand M (2018) The effect of nature of porous material on diffuse field acoustic transmission of the sandwich aerospace composite doubly curved shell. Aerosp Sci Technol 78:157–170

    Google Scholar 

  5. Talebitooti R, Choudari Khameneh A, Zarastvand M, Kornokar M (2018) Investigation of three-dimensional theory on sound transmission through compressed poroelastic sandwich cylindrical shell in various boundary configurations. J Sandw Struct Mater 21:2313–2357

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tam C (1976) A study of sound transmission in curved duct bends by the Galerkin method. J Sound Vib 45(1):91–104

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu B, Feng L, Nilsson A (2007) Influence of overpressure on sound transmission through curved panels. J Sound Vib 302(4–5):760–776

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tang W-C (2008) Measurement the noise reduction of doubly curved composite sandwich structures. Build Acoust 15(3):231–247

    Google Scholar 

  9. Qu Y, Hua H, Meng G (2015) Vibro-acoustic analysis of coupled spherical–cylindrical–spherical shells stiffened by ring and stringer reinforcements. J Sound Vib 355:345–359

    Google Scholar 

  10. Qu Y, Meng G (2015) Vibro-acoustic analysis of multilayered shells of revolution based on a general higher-order shear deformable zig-zag theory. Compos Struct 134:689–707

    Google Scholar 

  11. Talebitooti R, Zarastvand M, Gohari H (2017) Investigation of power transmission across laminated composite doubly curved shell in the presence of external flow considering shear deformation shallow shell theory. J Vib Control 24:4492–4504

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Talebitooti R, Zarastvand M, Gohari H (2018) The influence of boundaries on sound insulation of the multilayered aerospace poroelastic composite structure. Aerosp Sci Technol 80:452–471

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koval LR (1979) On sound transmission into an orthotropic shell. J Sound Vib 63(1):51–59

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Blaise A, Lesueur C (1992) Acoustic transmission through a 2-D orthotropic multi-layered infinite cylindrical shell. J Sound Vib 155(1):95–109

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Utsumi M (1999) An efficient method for sound transmission in non-uniform circular ducts. J Sound Vib 227(4):735–748

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee J-H, Kim J (2002) Sound transmission through periodically stiffened cylindrical shells. J Sound Vib 251(3):431–456

    Google Scholar 

  17. Daneshjou K, Nouri A, Talebitooti R (2009) Analytical model of sound transmission through orthotropic cylindrical shells with subsonic external flow. Aerosp Sci Technol 13(1):18–26

    Google Scholar 

  18. Blaise A, Lesueur C (1994) Acoustic transmission through a” 3-D” orthotropic multi-layered infinite cylindrical shell, part I: formulation of the problem. J Sound Vib 171(5):651–664

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Blaise A, Lesueur C (1994) Acoustic transmission through a” 3-D” orthotropic multi-layered infinite cylindrical shell, part II: validation and numerical exploitation for large structures. J Sound Vib 171(5):665–680

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Mofakhami M, Toudeshky HH, Hashemi S (2008) Noise reduction evaluation of multi-layered viscoelastic infinite cylinder under acoustical wave excitation. Shock Vib 15(5):551–572

    Google Scholar 

  21. Magniez J, Chazot J-D, Hamdi MA, Troclet B (2014) A mixed 3D-shell analytical model for the prediction of sound transmission through sandwich cylinders. J Sound Vib 333(19):4750–4770

    Google Scholar 

  22. Daneshjou K, Talebitooti R, Tarkashvand A (2016) Analysis of sound transmission loss through thick-walled cylindrical shell using three-dimensional elasticity theory. Int J Mech Sci 106:286–296

    Google Scholar 

  23. Talebitooti R, Khameneh AC (2017) Wave propagation across double-walled laminated composite cylindrical shells along with air-gap using three-dimensional theory. Compos Struct 165:44–64

    Google Scholar 

  24. Daneshjou K, Talebitooti R, Tarkashvand A (2018) Investigation on sound transmission through thick-wall cylindrical shells using 3D-theory of elasticity in the presence of external and mean air-gap flow. J Vib Control 24(5):975–1000

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cummings A, Chang I-J, Astley R (1984) Sound transmission at low frequencies through the walls of distorted circular ducts. J Sound Vib 97(2):261–286

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cao X, Hua H, Wa X (2014) Vibroacoustic comparisons of composite laminated cylindrical shells according to three shear deformation shell theories. Arch Appl Mech 84(7):1015–1036

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Shojaeefard MH, Talebitooti R, Ahmadi R, Gheibi MR (2014) Sound transmission across orthotropic cylindrical shells using third-order shear deformation theory. Latin Am J Solids Struct 11(11):2039–2072

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tang Y, Robinson J, Silcox R (1996) Sound transmission through a cylindrical sandwich shell with honeycomb core. In: 34th Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, p 877

  29. Tang YY, Silcox RJ, Robinson JH (1996) Sound transmission through two concentric cylindrical sandwich shells

  30. Daneshjou K, Nouri A, Talebitooti R (2008) Analytical model of sound transmission through laminated composite cylindrical shells considering transverse shear deformation. Appl Math Mech 29(9):1165–1177

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Qatu MS, Sullivan RW, Wang W (2010) Recent research advances on the dynamic analysis of composite shells: 2000–2009. Compos Struct 93(1):14–31

    Google Scholar 

  32. Koval LR (1976) Effect of air flow, panel curvature, and internal pressurization on field-incidence transmission loss. J Acoust Soc Am 59(6):1379–1385

    Google Scholar 

  33. Blaise A, Lesueur C, Gotteland M, Barbe M (1991) On sound transmission into an orthotropic infinite shell: comparison with Koval’s results and understanding of phenomena. J Sound Vib 150(2):233–243

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang Q (2001) Wave propagation in a piezoelectric coupled cylindrical membrane shell. Int J Solids Struct 38(46–47):8207–8218

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Henry JK, Clark R (2002) Active control of sound transmission through a curved panel into a cylindrical enclosure. J Sound Vib 249(2):325–349

    Google Scholar 

  36. Daneshjou K, Nouri A, Talebitooti R (2007) Sound transmission through laminated composite cylindrical shells using analytical model. Arch Appl Mech 77(6):363–379

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Klos J, Robinson J, Buehrle R (2003) Sound transmission through a curved honeycomb composite panel. In: 9th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference and exhibit, p 3157

  38. Daneshjou K, Talebitooti R, Nouri A (2008) Analytical model of sound transmission through orthotropic double walled cylinderical shells. Trans Can Soc Mech Eng 32(1):43–66

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Xu S, Qiu C, Liu Z (2012) Acoustic transmission through asymmetric grating structures made of cylinders. J Appl Phys 111(9):094505

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhao X, Li Y (2015) Vibration and acoustic responses of an orthotropic composite conical shell in a hygroscopic environment. Int J Appl Mech 7(04):1550053

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhao X, Zhang B, Li Y (2017) Vibration and acoustic radiation of an orthotropic composite cylindrical shell in a hygroscopic environment. J Vib Control 23(4):673–692

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Talebitooti R, Ahmadi R, Shojaeefard M (2015) Three-dimensional wave propagation on orthotropic cylindrical shells with arbitrary thickness considering state space method. Compos Struct 132:239–254

    Google Scholar 

  43. Selamet A, Xu M, Lee I-J, Huff N (2004) Analytical approach for sound attenuation in perforated dissipative silencers. J Acoust Soc Am 115(5):2091–2099

    Google Scholar 

  44. Li D, Vipperman JS (2005) Mathematical model for characterizing noise transmission into finite cylindrical structures. J Acoust Soc Am 117(2):679–689

    Google Scholar 

  45. Daneshjou K, Shokrieh M, Moghaddam MG, Talebitooti R (2010) Analytical model of sound transmission through relatively thick FGM cylindrical shells considering third order shear deformation theory. Compos Struct 93(1):67–78

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ramezani H, Talebitooti R (2015) Vibroacoustic response of a double-walled cylindrical FGM shell with a porous sandwiched layer. Mech Compos Mater 51(5):581–592

    Google Scholar 

  47. Daneshjou K, Talebitooti R, Kornokar M (2017) Vibroacoustic study on a multilayered functionally graded cylindrical shell with poroelastic core and bonded–unbonded configuration. J Sound Vib 393:157–175

    Google Scholar 

  48. Talebitooti R, Daneshjou K, Tarkashvand A (2017) Study of imperfect bonding effects on sound transmission loss through functionally graded laminated sandwich cylindrical shells. Int J Mech Sci 133:469–483

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lee J-H, Kim J, Kim H-J (2001) Simplified method to solve sound transmission through structures lined with elastic porous material. J Acoust Soc Am 110(5):2282–2294

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hasheminejad SM, Avazmohammadi R (2006) Acoustic diffraction by a pair of poroelastic cylinders. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech 86(8):589–605

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhou J, Bhaskar A, Zhang X (2015) Sound transmission through double cylindrical shells lined with porous material under turbulent boundary layer excitation. J Sound Vib 357:253–268

    Google Scholar 

  52. Liu Y, He C (2015) On sound transmission through double-walled cylindrical shells lined with poroelastic material: comparison with Zhou’s results and further effect of external mean flow. J Sound Vib 358:192–198

    Google Scholar 

  53. Liu Y, He C (2016) Diffuse field sound transmission through sandwich composite cylindrical shells with poroelastic core and external mean flow. Compos Struct 135:383–396

    Google Scholar 

  54. Magniez J, Hamdi MA, Chazot J-D, Troclet B (2016) A mixed “Biot–Shell” analytical model for the prediction of sound transmission through a sandwich cylinder with a poroelastic core. J Sound Vib 360:203–223

    Google Scholar 

  55. Oliazadeh P, Farshidianfar A (2017) Analysis of different techniques to improve sound transmission loss in cylindrical shells. J Sound Vib 389:276–291

    Google Scholar 

  56. Golzari M, Jafari AA (2018) Sound transmission loss through triple-walled cylindrical shells with porous layers. J Acoust Soc Am 143(6):3529–3544

    Google Scholar 

  57. Strassberger M, Waller H (2000) Active noise reduction by structural control using piezo-electric actuators. Mechatronics 10(8):851–868

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ray M, Balaji R (2007) Active structural–acoustic control of laminated cylindrical panels using smart damping treatment. Int J Mech Sci 49(9):1001–1017

    Google Scholar 

  59. Novakova K, Mokry P, Vaclavik J (2012) Application of piezoelectric macro-fiber-composite actuators to the suppression of noise transmission through curved glass plates. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 59(9):2004–2014

    Google Scholar 

  60. Shah P, Ray M (2013) Active structural–acoustic control of laminated composite truncated conical shells using smart damping treatment. J Vib Acoust 135(2):021001

    Google Scholar 

  61. Koval LR (1977) Effect of stiffening on sound transmission into a cylindrical shell in flight. AIAA J 15(7):899–900

    Google Scholar 

  62. Koval LR (1980) On sound transmission into a stiffened cylindrical shell with rings and stringers treated as discrete elements. J Sound Vib 71(4):511–521

    Google Scholar 

  63. Gardonio P, Ferguson N, Fahy F (2001) A modal expansion analysis of noise transmission through circular cylindrical shell structures with blocking masses. J Sound Vib 244(2):259–297

    Google Scholar 

  64. Cao X, Hua H, Ma C (2012) Acoustic radiation from shear deformable stiffened laminated cylindrical shells. J Sound Vib 331(3):651–670

    Google Scholar 

  65. Cao X, Ma C, Hua H (2013) Acoustic radiation from thick laminated cylindrical shells with sparse cross stiffeners. J Vib Acoust 135(3):031009

    Google Scholar 

  66. Tang D, Yao X, Jin Y, Pang F (2016) Acoustic radiation from shear deformable ring-stiffened laminated composite cylindrical shell submerged in flowing fluid. Appl Ocean Res 61:65–80

    Google Scholar 

  67. Yao S, Li P, Zhou X, Hu G (2014) Sound reduction by metamaterial-based acoustic enclosure. AIP Adv 4(12):124306

    Google Scholar 

  68. Tian H, Wang X, Zhou Y (2014) Theoretical model and analytical approach for a circular membrane–ring structure of locally resonant acoustic metamaterial. Appl Phys A 114(3):985–990

    Google Scholar 

  69. Missaoui J, Cheng L (1999) Vibroacoustic analysis of a finite cylindrical shell with internal floor partition. J Sound Vib 226(1):101–123

    Google Scholar 

  70. El Hafidi A, Martin B, Faris WF, Lay B (2011) A study of noise transmission through cylindrical shell using modal truncation approach. Int J Veh Noise Vib 7(3):271–284

    Google Scholar 

  71. Tebyanian A, Ghazavi MR (2018) Vibro-acoustic and sound transmission loss analysis of truncated conical shell subjected to incident sound wave. J Vib Control 25:435–444

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  72. Wu C (2002) Double-layer structural–acoustic coupling for cylindrical shell by using a combination of WDA and BIE. Appl Acoust 63(10):1143–1154

    Google Scholar 

  73. Jena D, Panigrahi S (2017) Numerically estimating acoustic transmission loss of a reactive muffler with and without mean flow. Measurement 109:168–186

    Google Scholar 

  74. Tang S (2018) Reduction of sound transmission across plenum windows by incorporating an array of rigid cylinders. J Sound Vib 415:25–40

    Google Scholar 

  75. Smith P Jr (1957) Sound transmission through thin cylindrical shells. J Acoust Soc Am 29(6):721–729

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  76. Koval LR (1976) On sound transmission into a thin cylindrical shell under “flight conditions”. J Sound Vib 48(2):265–275

    Google Scholar 

  77. Koval LR (1978) Effects of cavity resonances on sound transmission into a thin cylindrical shell. J Sound Vib 59(1):23–33

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. Lee J-H, Kim J (2003) Study on sound transmission characteristics of a cylindrical shell using analytical and experimental models. Appl Acoust 64(6):611–632

    Google Scholar 

  79. Estéve SJ, Johnson ME (2002) Reduction of sound transmission into a circular cylindrical shell using distributed vibration absorbers and Helmholtz resonators. J Acoust Soc Am 112(6):2840–2848

    Google Scholar 

  80. Li H, Wu C, Huang X (2003) Parametric study on sound radiation from an infinite fluid-filled/semi-submerged cylindrical shell. Appl Acoust 64(5):495–509

    Google Scholar 

  81. Zhou J, Bhaskar A, Zhang X (2013) Sound transmission through a double-panel construction lined with poroelastic material in the presence of mean flow. J Sound Vib 332(16):3724–3734

    Google Scholar 

  82. Zhang Q, Mao Y, Qi D (2017) Effect of perforation on the sound transmission through a double-walled cylindrical shell. J Sound Vib 410:344–363

    Google Scholar 

  83. Torregrosa A, Gil A, García-Cuevas L, Quintero P, Denia F (2018) Prediction of the transmission loss in a flexible chamber. J Fluids Struct 82:134–153

    Google Scholar 

  84. Talebitooti R, Daneshjou K, Tarkashvand A (2019) Incorporating the Havriliak–Negami model in wave propagation through polymeric viscoelastic core in a laminated sandwich cylinder. Thin Walled Struct 134:460–474

    Google Scholar 

  85. Sharma N, Mahapatra TR, Panda SK (2018) Numerical analysis of acoustic radiation responses of shear deformable laminated composite shell panel in hygrothermal environment. J Sound Vib 431:346–366

    Google Scholar 

  86. White PH (1966) Sound transmission through a finite, closed, cylindrical shell. J Acoust Soc Am 40(5):1124–1130

    Google Scholar 

  87. Oliazadeh P, Farshidianfar A, Crocker MJ (2018) Experimental and analytical investigation on sound transmission loss of cylindrical shells with absorbing material. J Sound Vib 434:28–43

    Google Scholar 

  88. Kingan MJ, Yang Y, Mace BR (2018) Sound transmission through cylindrical structures using a wave and finite element method. Wave Motion 87:58–74

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  89. Ghinet S, Atalla N, Osman H (2006) Diffuse field transmission into infinite sandwich composite and laminate composite cylinders. J Sound Vib 289(4–5):745–778

    Google Scholar 

  90. Yuan C, Bergsma O, Beukers A (2012) Sound transmission loss prediction of the composite fuselage with different methods. Appl Compos Mater 19(6):865–883

    Google Scholar 

  91. Chandana PK, Tiwari SB, Vukkadala KN (2017) Numerical estimation of sound transmission loss in launch vehicle payload fairing. J Inst Eng (India) Ser C 98(4):471–478

    Google Scholar 

  92. Grosveld F, Beyer T (1989) Noise reduction of a composite cylinder subjected to random acousticexcitation. In: 12th Aeroacoustic conference, p 1049

  93. Denli H, Sun J (2008) Structural–acoustic optimization of sandwich cylindrical shells for minimum interior sound transmission. J Sound Vib 316(1–5):32–49

    Google Scholar 

  94. Shen C, Xie Y, Li J, Cummer SA, Jing Y (2018) Acoustic metacages for sound shielding with steady air flow. J Appl Phys 123(12):124501

    Google Scholar 

  95. Ghinet S, Atalla N, Osman H (2005) The transmission loss of curved laminates and sandwich composite panels. J Acoust Soc Am 118(2):774–790

    Google Scholar 

  96. Daneshjou K, Talebitooti R, Nouri A (2009) Acoustic transmission through cylindrical shells treated with FLD mechanisms. J Mech 25(3):299–306

    Google Scholar 

  97. Talebitooti R, Zarastvand M (2018) Vibroacoustic behavior of orthotropic aerospace composite structure in the subsonic flow considering the third order shear deformation theory. Aerosp Sci Technol 75:227–236

    Google Scholar 

  98. Koval LR (1980) Sound transmission into a laminated composite cylindrical shell. J Sound Vib 71(4):523–530

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  99. Reddy E, Mallik A (1985) Response of and sound radiation from a layered cylinder with regular axial stiffeners. J Sound Vib 103(4):519–531

    Google Scholar 

  100. Lee J-H, Kim J (2002) Analysis and measurement of sound transmission through a double-walled cylindrical shell. J Sound Vib 251(4):631–649

    Google Scholar 

  101. Daneshjou K, Ramezani H, Talebitooti R (2011) Wave transmission through laminated composite double-walled cylindrical shell lined with porous materials. Appl Math Mech 32(6):701–718

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  102. Wang Y, Crocker M, Raju P (1983) Theoretical and experimental evaluation of transmission loss of cylinders. AIAA J 21(2):186–192

    Google Scholar 

  103. Liu B, Feng L, Nilsson A (2007) Sound transmission through curved aircraft panels with stringer and ring frame attachments. J Sound Vib 300(3–5):949–973

    Google Scholar 

  104. George J, Egan J, Kim J (2009) Study of sound transmission through muffler sidewall by analytical, numerical and experimental methods. Noise Control Eng J 57(5):434–441

    Google Scholar 

  105. Ahmadi S, Nassiri P, Ghasemi I, Esmaeilpoor MRM (2015) Sound transmission loss through nanoclay-reinforced polymers. Iran Polym J 24(8):641–649

    Google Scholar 

  106. Ferdinand W (1996) Numerical comparison of active acoustic and structural noise control in a stiffened double wall cylinder

  107. Estève SJ, Johnson ME (2002) Control of the noise transmitted into a cylinder using optimally damped Helmholtz resonators and distributed vibration absorbers. In: Submitted to the ninth international congress on sound and vibration, Orlando, Florida

  108. Griffin S, Lane SA, Lazzaro A (2008) Active vibroacoustic device for noise reduction in launch vehicles. J Spacecr Rockets 45(6):1282–1292

    Google Scholar 

  109. Cao X, Shi L, Zhang X, Jiang G (2013) Active control of acoustic radiation from laminated cylindrical shells integrated with a piezoelectric layer. Smart Mater Struct 22(6):065003

    Google Scholar 

  110. Ma X, Jin G, Liu Z (2014) Active structural acoustic control of an elastic cylindrical shell coupled to a two-stage vibration isolation system. Int J Mech Sci 79:182–194

    Google Scholar 

  111. Loghmani A, Danesh M, Kwak MK, Keshmiri M (2016) Active structural acoustic control of a smart cylindrical shell using a virtual microphone. Smart Mater Struct 25(4):045020

    Google Scholar 

  112. Hasheminejad SM, Cheraghi M, Jamalpoor A (2018) Active damping of sound transmission through an electrorheological fluid-actuated sandwich cylindrical shell. J Sandw Struct Mater 1099636218777966

  113. Talebitooti R, Gohari H, Zarastvand M (2017) Multi objective optimization of sound transmission across laminated composite cylindrical shell lined with porous core investigating non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Aerosp Sci Technol 69:269–280

    Google Scholar 

  114. Shojaeifard M, Talebitooti R, Yadollahi A (2011) Optimization of sound transmission through laminated composite cylindrical shells by using a genetic algorithm. Mech Compos Mater 47(4):481

    Google Scholar 

  115. Nouri A, Astaraki S (2014) Optimization of sound transmission loss through a thin functionally graded material cylindrical shell. Shock Vib. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/814682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Talebitooti R, Gohari HD (2018) Optimization of sound transmission through composite cylinder with poroelastic core considering VCM. Mech Adv Mater Struct. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2018.1472345

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Noise and Vibration Control Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

    M. R. Zarastvand, M. Ghassabi & R. Talebitooti

Authors
  1. M. R. Zarastvand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Ghassabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Talebitooti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Talebitooti.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zarastvand, M.R., Ghassabi, M. & Talebitooti, R. Acoustic Insulation Characteristics of Shell Structures: A Review. Arch Computat Methods Eng 28, 505–523 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09387-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09387-z

Search

Navigation