Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Withholding investments in energy only markets: can contracts make a difference?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although there are mechanisms to control market power in the spot market, withholding investments can still increase profits and hamper adequate capacity expansion. We examine the effect on investment of one suggested approach to reducing market power, contracting longer term. We construct a stylized model of an energy-only market where two firms, each specializing in one technology, invest in a first stage, contract part of their production in the second stage and sell the rest in the spot market in the third stage. We compare this model to one of an energy-only market having two stages, investment and a spot market. We find cases where the contracts change neither capacity nor peak prices, where the foreclosing effect of one player blocking the other from contracts markets increases investments and reduces prices, and where the opportunity to foreclose the market can incentivize one firm to lower its investment and increase its pricing power to the detriment of consumers. The model relies on the simplest possible assumptions of imperfect competition (subgame perfect equilibria with Cournot agents). We illustrate the different outcomes in a numerical example with two load steps (peak and off-peak) where we change one parameter, the height of the off-peak time segment. We find cases with increased and decreased capacity as well as no change in capacity. Since there is no general characterization of the consequences of contracts in this simple example, there can be no characterization in more complicated models that contain the market structures included here, and regulators or competition authorities cannot rely on contracts to induce sufficient capacity expansion by reducing market power. One other market mechanism that has been proposed to induce investment, a capacity auction with predetermined capacity requirements, is a potential alternative to limit market power that deserves further exploration to determine the extent to which it can provide an adequate incentive to invest in the presence of market power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allaz B., Vila J.-L. (1993) Cournot competition, forward markets and efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory 59: 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushnell J. B. (2007) Oligopoly equilibria in electricity contract markets. Journal of Regulatory Economics 32: 225–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushnell J. B., Mansur E. T., Saravia C. (2008) Vertical arrangements, market structure, and : an analysis of restructured U.S. electricity markets. American Economic Review 98(1): 237–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramton P., Stoft S. (2008) Forward reliability markets: Less risk, less market power, more efficiency. Utilities Policy 16(3): 194–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Hautecloque A. (2009) Legal uncertainty and competition policy in European deregulated electricity markets: the case of long-term exclusive supply contracts. World Competition 32(1): 91–112

    Google Scholar 

  • de Hautecloque, A., & Glachant J.-M. (2008). Long-term energy supply contracts in European competition policy: Fuzzy not crazy. Working Paper 0816. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.

  • Green R. (1992) Contract and the pool: The British electricity market. Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge, Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Green R., Newbery D. M. (1992) Competition in the British electricity spot market. Journal of Political Economy 100: 929–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey S.M., Hogan W.W. (2000) California electricity prices and forward market hedging. Harvard University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow P. (2007) Competitive electricity markets and investments in new generating capacity. In: Dieter H. (ed) The New energy paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskow, P. (2008). Investment in new base load generating capacity. Presentation, EIA 30th Anniversary Conference. Washington.

  • Hobbs, B. (2010). Private communication.

  • Murphy F. H., Smeers Y. (2005) Generation capacity expansion in imperfectly competitive restructured electricity markets. Operations Research 53(4): 646–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy F. H., Smeers Y. (2010a) On the impact of forward markets on investments in oligopolistic markets with reference to electricity. Operations Research 58(3): 515–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, F. H., & Smeers Y. (2010b). Withholding investments in energy only markets: Can contracts make a difference? Mimeo. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/73743. Accessed 27 July 2010.

  • Newbery D. (1998) Competition, contracts, and entry in the electricity spot market. RAND Journal of Economics 29(4): 726–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey, P., & Tirole, J. (2006). A Primer on foreclosure. In M. Armstrong & R. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization III. New York: North-Holland.

  • Stoft S. (2002) Power systems economics: Designing markets for electricity. IEEE Press, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolak F. (2000) An empirical analysis of the impact of hedge contracts on bidding behavior in a competitive electricity market. International Economic Journal 14(2): 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram C. D. (1999) Measuring duopoly power in British electricity spot market. American Economic Review 89: 805–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yves Smeers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, F., Smeers, Y. Withholding investments in energy only markets: can contracts make a difference?. J Regul Econ 42, 159–179 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-012-9184-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-012-9184-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation