Abstract
Intelligent tutoring Systems (ITSs) adapt content and activities with the goals of being both effective and efficient instructional environments. They have goals for students to be challenged and guided in an optimal way-without being too overwhelmed with difficult material or too bored with easy or repetitive material. We propose a particular definition of the zone of proximal development (ZPD) as a general way to describe what all ITSs try to do, and we propose a foundational analysis of instructional adaptivity, student modeling, and system evaluation in terms of the ZPD. We give an operational definition of the ZPD and give an example of its use, and summarize how instructional methods such as scaffolding can be used to maintain ZPD-learning. We also explain how our definition of the ZPD can lead to a more complete model for efficient and effective instruction than common mastery learning criteria.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wertsch, J. (1984). “The zone of proximal development: Some conceptual issues.” InB. Rogoff, J. Wertsch (Eds.) Children’s Learning in the “Zone of Proximal Development” pp. 7–18. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Luckin, R; du Boulay, B. (1999a) Ecolab: the development and evaluation of a Vygotskian design framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Volume 10. Number 2. pp. 198–220
Luckin, R; du Boulay, B. (1999b). Capability, Potential, and Collaborative Assistance. Proc. ofUserModelling-99, J. Kay (ed). Springer: NY, pp. 139–148.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychology processes. Cambridge MA: Harvard University press.
Hadegaard, M. (1991).’ The zone of proximal development as basis for instruction.“ In L. C. Moll (Ed) Vygotsky and education: instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. pp. 155–172.
Beal, C. R., & Arroyo, I. (in press). The Animal Watch Project: Creating an intelligent computer math tutor. In S. Calvert, A. Jordan, & R. Cocking (Eds.) Children in the digital age. New York: Praeger.
Arroyo, I.; Beck, J.; Woolf, B.; Beal, C.; Schultz, K. (2000) Macroadapting Animalwatch to gender and cognitive differences with respect to hint interactivity and symbolism. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Montreal, Canada. June 2000. pp. 574–583.
Collins, A., Brown, J.S., Newman, S. (1989). “Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. In (L.B. Resnick (Ed.) Knowing, Learning, and Instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Murray, T., Arroyo, I. (2002). Toward Measuring and Maintaining the Zone of Proximal Development in Adaptive Instructional Systems. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardères, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2363. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47987-2_75
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47987-2_75
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43750-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47987-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive