Abstract
When seeing a visual image, humans prioritize the perception of global features, which is followed by the assessment of the local ones. This global precedence has been investigated using hierarchical stimuli that consist of a large, global shape formed by the spatial arrangement of small local shapes. Comparing non-human animals to humans, research on global and local processing has revealed a heterogeneous pattern of results with some species exhibiting a local precedence and others a global one. Many factors have been proposed to influence the global and local processing: internal factors (e.g., age, sex) and external elements or perceptual field variables (e.g., stimulus size, visual angle, eccentricity, sparsity). In this review, studies showing that different non-human species process hierarchical stimuli in the same (global precedence) or reverse (local precedence) direction as humans are first collated. Different ecological, perceptual, and anatomical features that may influence global and local processing are subsequently proposed based on a detailed analysis of these studies. This information is likely to improve our understanding of the mechanisms behind the perceptual organization and visual processing, and could explain the observed differences in hierarchical processing between species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, B., Chan, A., Callahan, H., & Milgram, N. W. (2000). The canine as a model of human cognitive aging: recent developments. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 24(5), 675–692.
Antes, J. R., & Mann, S. W. (1984). Gobal-local precedence in picture processing. Psychological Research, 46(3), 247–259.
Atkinson, J., Braddick, O., & Braddick, F. (1974). Acuity and contrast sensivity of infant vision. Nature, 247, 403–404.
Avargues-Weber, A., Dyer, A. G., Ferrah, N., & Giurfa, M. (2015). The forest or the trees: preference for global over local image processing is reversed by prior experience in honeybees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1799), 20142384.
Basso, M. R., Schefft, B. K., Ris, M. D., & Dember, W. N. (1996). Mood and global-local visual processing. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2(3), 249–255.
Behrmann, M., Thomas, C., & Humphreys, K. (2006). Seeing it differently: visual processing in autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(6), 258–264.
Brown, A. M., & Yamamoto, M. (1986). Visual acuity in newborn and preterm infants measured with grating acuity cards. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 102(2), 245–253.
Burack, J. A., Enns, J. T., Iarocci, G., & Randolph, B. (2000). Age differences in visual search for compound patterns: Long-versus short-range grouping. Developmental Psychology, 36(6), 731.
Cassia, V. M., Simion, F., Milani, I., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Dominance of global visual properties at birth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(3), 398.
Cavoto, K. K., & Cook, R. G. (2001). Cognitive precedence for local information in hierarchical stimulus processing by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27(1), 3.
Chiandetti, C., Pecchia, T., Patt, F., & Vallortigara, G. (2014). Visual hierarchical processing and lateralization of cognitive functions through domestic chicks’ eyes. PLoS One, 9(1), e84435.
Davidoff, J., Fonteneau, E., & Fagot, J. (2008). Local and global processing: Observations from a remote culture. Cognition, 108(3), 702–709.
De Lillo, C., Spinozzi, G., Truppa, V., & Naylor, D. M. (2005). A comparative analysis of global and local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young children (Homo sapiens) and monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119(2), 155.
De Lillo, C., Spinozzi, G., Palumbo, M., & Giustino, G. (2011). Attention allocation modulates the processing of hierarchical visual patterns: A comparative analysis of capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) and humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 37(3), 341.
Deruelle, C., & Fagot, J. (1997). Hemispheric lateralisation and global precedence effects in the processing of visual stimuli by humans and baboons (Papio papio). Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 2(3–4), 233–246.
Deruelle, C., & Fagot, J. (1998). Visual search for global/local stimulus features in humans and baboons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(3), 476–481.
Douglas, R. H., & Hawryshyn, C. W. (1990). Behavioural studies of fish vision: an analysis of visual capabilities. In The visual system of fish (pp. 373–418). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Enns, J. T., Burack, J. A., Iarocci, G., & Randolph, B. (2000). The orthogenetic principle in the perception of “forests” and “trees”? Journal of Adult Development, 7(1), 41–48.
Evans, C. S., & Evans, L. (1999). Chicken food calls are functionally referential. Animal Behaviour, 58(2), 307–319.
Fagot, J., & Deruelle, C. (1997). Processing of global and local visual information and hemispheric specialization in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(2), 429.
Fagot, J., & Tomonaga, M. (1999). Global and local processing in humans (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Use of a visual search task with compound stimuli. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113(1), 3.
Feldman, J. (1999). The role of objects in perceptual grouping. Acta Psychologica, 102(2–3), 137–163.
Franceschini, S., Bertoni, S., Gianesini, T., Gori, S., & Facoetti, A. (2017). A different vision of dyslexia: Local precedence on global perception. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–10.
Fremouw, T., Herbranson, W. T., & Shimp, C. P. (1998). Priming of attention to local or global levels of visual analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24(3), 278.
Fujita, K., & Matsuzawa, T. (1990). Delayed figure reconstruction by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104(4), 345.
Goldstein, G., & Shelly, C. (1981). Does the right hemisphere age more rapidly than the left? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 3(1), 65–78.
Goldstein-Marcusohn, Y., Goldfarb, L., & Shany, M. (2020). Global and Local Visual Processing in Rate/Accuracy Subtypes of Dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 828.
Goto, K., Wills, A. J., & Lea, S. E. (2004). Global-feature classification can be acquired more rapidly than local-feature classification in both humans and pigeons. Animal Cognition, 7, 109–113.
Gross, T. F. (2005). Global–local precedence in the perception of facial age and emotional expression by children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(6), 773–785.
Hejjas, K., Vas, J., Kubinyi, E., Sasvari-Szekely, M., Miklosi, A., & Ronai, Z. (2007). Novel repeat polymorphisms of the dopaminergic neurotransmitter genes among dogs and wolves. Mammalian Genome, 18(12), 871–879.
Hopkins, W. D. (1997). Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Neuropsychologia, 35(3), 343–348.
Hopkins, W. D., & Washburn, D. A. (2002). Matching visual stimuli on the basis of global and local features by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Animal Cognition, 5(1), 27–31.
Hughes, H. C., Nozawa, G., & Kitterle, F. (1996). Global precedence, spatial frequency channels, and the statistics of natural images. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(3), 197–230.
Kamil, A. C., & Cheng, K. (2001). Way-finding and landmarks: the multiple-bearings hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 204(1), 103–113.
Kimchi, R. (1990). Children’s perceptual organisation of hierarchical visual patterns. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2(2), 133–149.
Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 24.
Kimchi, R., Hadad, B., Behrmann, M., & Palmer, S. E. (2005). Microgenesis and ontogenesis of perceptual organization: Evidence from global and local processing of hierarchical patterns. Psychological Science, 16(4), 282–290.
Kinchla, R. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (1979). The order of visual processing:“Top-down”,“bottom-up”, or “middle-out.” Perception & Psychophysics, 25(3), 225–231.
Kramer, J. H., Ellenberg, L., Leonard, J., & Share, L. J. (1996). Developmental sex differences in global-local perceptual bias. Neuropsychology, 10(3), 402.
Lomber, S. G. (2002). Learning to see the trees before the forest: reversible deactivation of the superior colliculus during learning of local and global visual features. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(6), 4049–4054.
Luna, D. (1993). Effects of exposure duration and eccentricity of global and local information on processing dominance. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 183–200.
Lux, S., Marshall, J. C., Thimm, M., & Fink, G. R. (2008). Differential processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in young and older healthy adults: Implications for pathology. Cortex, 44(1), 21–28.
Marful, A., Paolieri, D., & Bernal, A. (2021). Sex, menstrual cycle, and hormonal contraceptives influences on global–local processing. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 134, 105430.
Martin, M. (1979). Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. Memory & Cognition, 7(6), 476–484.
Mena, M. B. (1992). Can certain stimulus characteristics influence the hemispheric differences in global and local processing? Acta Psychologica, 79(3), 201–217.
Millán, Á. S., Iglesias, J., Gutkin, A., & Olivares, E. I. (2021). Forest before trees: Letter stimulus and sex modulate global precedence in visual perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 899.
Mottron, L., Burack, J. A., Iarocci, G., Belleville, S., & Enns, J. T. (2003). Locally oriented perception with intact global processing among adolescents with high-functioning autism: evidence from multiple paradigms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(6), 904–913.
Msetfi, R. M., Murphy, R. A., Simpson, J., & Kornbrot, D. E. (2005). Depressive realism and outcome density bias in contingency judgments: the effect of the context and intertrial interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(1), 10.
Murphy, M. S., Brooks, D. I., & Cook, R. G. (2015). Pigeons use high spatial frequencies when memorizing pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 41(3), 277.
Nakamura, E. L. (1968). Visual acuity of two tunas, Katsuwonus pelamis and Euthynnus affinis. Copeia, 1, 41–49.
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 353–383.
Neiworth, J. J., Gleichman, A. J., Olinick, A. S., & Lamp, K. E. (2006). Global and local processing in adult humans (Homo sapiens), 5-year-old children (Homo sapiens), and adult cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 120(4), 323.
Northmore, D. P. M., & Dvorak, C. A. (1979). Contrast sensitivity and acuity of the goldfish. Vision Research, 19(3), 255–261.
Oken, B. S., Kishiyama, S. S., Kaye, J. A., & Jones, D. E. (1999). Age-related differences in global-local processing: stability of laterality differences but disproportionate impairment in global processing. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 12(2), 76–81.
Palumbo, M., Spinozzi, G., Truppa, V., & De Lillo, C. (2023). Spatial frequency and global–local visual processing in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.) and humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 137(1), 16.
Penzlin, V. H., & Stubbe, M. (1977). Studies on the visual acuity in the goldfish. Zoologische Jahrbucher: Abteilung für Algemeine Zoologie und Physiologie Der Tiere, 81, 310–326.
Pitteri, E., Mongillo, P., Carnier, P., & Marinelli, L. (2014). Hierarchical stimulus processing by dogs (Canis familiaris). Animal Cognition, 17(4), 869–877.
Plaisted, K., Swettenham, J., & Rees, L. (1999). Children with autism show local precedence in a divided attention task and global precedence in a selective attention task. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40(5), 733–742.
Quinlan, P. T., & Wilton, R. N. (1998). Grouping by proximity or similarity? Competition between the Gestalt principles in vision. Perception, 27(4), 417–430.
Rawlings, D., & Claridge, G. (1984). Schizotypy and hemisphere function—III: Performance asymmetries on tasks of letter recognition and local-global processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(6), 657–663.
Rezvani, Z., Katanforoush, A., & Pouretemad, H. (2020). Global precedence changes by environment: A systematic review and meta-analysis on effect of perceptual field variables on global-local visual processing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(5), 2348–2359.
Roalf, D., Lowery, N., & Turetsky, B. I. (2006). Behavioral and physiological findings of gender differences in global-local visual processing. Brain and Cognition, 60(1), 32–42.
Robertson, L. C., Lamb, M. R., & Knight, R. T. (1988). Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 8(10), 3757–3769.
Santacà, M., Miletto Petrazzini, M. E., Dadda, M., & Agrillo, C. (2020). Forest before the trees in the aquatic world: global and local processing in teleost fishes. PeerJ, 8, e9871.
Sasaki, Y., Hadjikhani, N., Fischl, B., Liu, A. K., Marret, S., Dale, A. M., & Tootell, R. B. (2001). Local and global attention are mapped retinotopically in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(4), 2077–2082.
Scherf, K. S., Behrmann, M., Kimchi, R., & Luna, B. (2009). Emergence of global shape processing continues through adolescence. Child Development, 80(1), 162–177.
Shulman, G. L., Sullivan, M. A., Gish, K., & Sakoda, W. J. (1986). The role of spatial-frequency channels in the perception of local and global structure. Perception, 15(3), 259–273.
Slavin, M. J., Mattingley, J. B., Bradshaw, J. L., & Storey, E. (2002). Local–global processing in Alzheimer’s disease: an examination of interference, inhibition and priming. Neuropsychologia, 40(8), 1173–1186.
Song, Y., & Hakoda, Y. (2012). The interference of local over global information processing in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder of the inattentive type. Brain and Development, 34(4), 308–317.
Spence, R., Fatema, M. K., Reichard, M., Huq, K. A., Wahab, M. A., Ahmed, Z. F., & Smith, C. (2006). The distribution and habitat preferences of the zebrafish in Bangladesh. Journal of Fish Biology, 69(5), 1435–1448.
Spinozzi, G., De Lillo, C., & Truppa, V. (2003). Global and local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117(1), 15.
Spinozzi, G., De Lillo, C., & Salvi, V. (2006). Local advantage in the visual processing of hierarchical stimuli following manipulations of stimulus size and element numerosity in monkeys (Cebus apella). Behavioural Brain Research, 166(1), 45–54.
Stevens, M., & Merilaita, S. (2009). Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1516), 481–488.
Tanaka, H. K., & Fujita, I. (2000). Global and local processing of visual patterns in macaque monkeys. Neuroreport, 11(13), 2881–2884.
Thornton, A., & Lukas, D. (2012). Individual variation in cognitive performance: developmental and evolutionary perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1603), 2773–2783.
Treisman, A., & Paterson, R. (1984). Emergent features, attention, and object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(1), 12.
Troscianko, T., Benton, C. P., Lovell, P. G., Tolhurst, D. J., & Pizlo, Z. (2009). Camouflage and visual perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1516), 449–461.
Troup, L. J. (1995). Towards the Development of a Model of Vision [Doctoral dissertation, University of Plymouth]. https://doi.org/10.24382/1339
Truppa, V., De Simone, D. A., & De Lillo, C. (2016). Short-term memory effects on visual global/local processing in tufted capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 130(2), 162.
Truppa, V., Carducci, P., De Simone, D. A., Bisazza, A., & De Lillo, C. (2017). Global/local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in a conflict–choice task by capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.). Animal Cognition, 20, 347–357.
Truppa, V., Sovrano, V. A., Spinozzi, G., & Bisazza, A. (2010). Processing of visual hierarchical stimuli by fish (Xenotoca eiseni). Behavioural Brain Research, 207(1), 51–60.
Van Kleeck, M. H., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1989). Gestalt laws of perceptual organization in an embedded figures task: Evidence for hemispheric specialization. Neuropsychologia, 27(9), 1179–1186.
Vander Wall, S. B. (1982). An experimental analysis of cache recovery in Clark’s nutcracker. Animal Behaviour, 30(1), 84–94.
Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172.
Wan, M., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., & Li, J. (2016). Do multicultural experiences facilitate global processing style? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(3), 209–214.
Weintraub, M., Segal, R. M., & Beck, A. T. (1974). An investigation of cognition and affect in the depressive experiences of normal men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(6), 911.
Yamanouchi, T. (1956). The visual acuity of the coral fish Microcanthus strigatus (Cuvier & Valenciennes). Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, 5(2), 133–156.
Yovel, I., Revelle, W., & Mineka, S. (2005). Who sees trees before forest? The obsessive-compulsive style of visual attention. Psychological Science, 16(2), 123–129.
Acknowledgments
I thank Christian Agrillo for his precious comments on a previous version of the review.
Funding
This research was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [ESP 433-B].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Practices Statement
No data or materials were used in the preparation of the article and as such none can be made available.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Santacà, M. Some like it “local”: A review of hierarchical processing in non-human animals. Learn Behav 52, 143–161 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-023-00605-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-023-00605-0