Skip to main content

How Many Stars Do You See in This Constellation?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Semantic Web: ESWC 2020 Satellite Events (ESWC 2020)

Abstract

With the increase of Knowledge Graphs available on the Web came the need of characterising them, adding for example provenance information. To facilitate adding statement-level metadata, an RDF syntax extension has recently been proposed to the Semantic Web community: RDF*. In this article, we examine the current coverage of RDF* by SPARQL engines. We identify a few issues arising even when performing simple operations such as counting the number of statements. We raise awareness on these issues and derive new research directions for the community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    As of March 2019, the LOD-cloud gathers more than 1 200 datasets sharing more than 16 000 links. https://lod-cloud.net/.

  2. 2.

    The W3C Workshop on Web Standardization for Graph Data (2019) has set a direction to bridge the Semantic Web and Property Graph communities together indicating RDF* as a viable option. https://www.w3.org/Data/events/data-ws-2019/index.html.

  3. 3.

    Stardog version 7.1.2 https://www.stardog.com/.

  4. 4.

    Blazegraph version 2.1.5 https://blazegraph.com/.

  5. 5.

    ExecuteSPARQLStar version 0.0.1 https://github.com/RDFstar/RDFstarTools.

  6. 6.

    More details are available from: https://github.com/dgraux/RDFStarObservatory.

  7. 7.

    Similarly to Blazegraph, instead of using “Select *”, users need to specify all the variables in the Select clause.

References

  1. Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z.: DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ASWC/ISWC -2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 722–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76298-0_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Frey, J., Müller, K., Hellmann, S., Rahm, E., Vidal, M.E.: Evaluation of metadata representations in RDF stores. Semant. Web 10(2), 205–229 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Frommhold, M., Piris, R.N., Arndt, N., Tramp, S., Petersen, N., Martin, M.: Towards versioning of arbitrary RDF data. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Semantic Systems, pp. 33–40 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harris, S., Seaborne, A., Prud’hommeaux, E.: SPARQL 1.1 query language. W3C Recomm. 21(10), 778 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hartig, O.: Foundations of RDF* and SPARQL* (an alternative approach to statement-level metadata in RDF). In: 11th Alberto Mendelzon International Workshop on Foundations of Data Management (AMW) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hartig, O., Thompson, B.: Foundations of an alternative approach to reification in RDF. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.3399 (2014)

  7. Kubitza, D.O., Böckmann, M., Graux, D.: SemanGit: a linked dataset from git. In: Ghidini, C., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2019. LNCS, vol. 11779, pp. 215–228. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Manola, F., Miller, E., McBride, B., et al.: RDF primer. W3C Recomm. 10(1–107), 6 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen, V., Bodenreider, O., Sheth, A.: Don’t like RDF reification? Making statements about statements using singleton property. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 759–770 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Orlandi, F., Passant, A.: Modelling provenance of DBpedia resources using Wikipedia contributions. J. Web Semant. 9(2), 149–164 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pérez, J., Arenas, M., Gutierrez, C.: Semantics and complexity of SPARQL. ACM Trans. Database Syst. (TODS) 34(3), 1–45 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vrandečić, D., Krötzsch, M.: Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM 57(10), 78–85 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was conducted with the financial support of the European Regional Development Fund and the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the EDGE Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 713567 at the ADAPT SFI Research Centre at Trinity College Dublin. The ADAPT SFI Centre for Digital Media Technology is funded by Science Foundation Ireland through the SFI Research Centres Programme and is co-funded under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Grant # 13/RC/2106.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fabrizio Orlandi or Damien Graux .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Orlandi, F., Graux, D., O’Sullivan, D. (2020). How Many Stars Do You See in This Constellation?. In: Harth, A., et al. The Semantic Web: ESWC 2020 Satellite Events. ESWC 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12124. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62327-2_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62327-2_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62326-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62327-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics