Google
We found gaze typing to be more erroneous than the other two modalities. Gaze typing was just as fast as head typing, and both were slower than mouse (hand-)�...
This paper investigates the usability of gaze-typing systems for disabled people in a broad perspective that takes into account the.
This paper investigates the usability of gaze-typing systems for disabled people in a broad perspective that takes into account the usage scenarios and the�...
People also ask
A detailed investigation of the efficiency and user satisfaction with a Danish and a Japanese gaze-typing system compares it to head- and mouse (hand) typing.
The clicker and dwell were the most popular selection mechanisms across the studies. � The clicker led to fewer errors, target re-entries, and was less taxing�...
Gaze typing compared with input by head and hand. Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium (ETRA), 131–138. https: � //doi.org/10.1145/968363.968389.
Gaze typing compared with input by head and hand. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye tracking Research & Applications. ACM, 131-138. Ilves M�...
We present a dwell-free, multimodal approach to gaze typing where the gaze input is supplemented with a foot input modality.
ABSTRACT. Gaze Typing, a gaze-assisted text entry method, allows in dividuals with motor (arm, spine) impairments to enter text.
A recent paper [19] , showed that the size of the keys might influence the performance in conditions of eye-typing (i.e., slower selection with small size) and�...