Google
Dialogical generalisations of formal logic-based argumentation are typically restricted to a limited set of locutions e.g., assert, why, claim or prefer. However, the use of enthymemes (i.e., arguments with incomplete logical structure) warrant extending this set of locutions.
People also ask
However, in real world dialogues, agents commonly exchange enthymemes—arguments with incomplete logical structure. This paper formalises the dialogical exchange�...
However, the use of enthymemes (i.e., arguments with incomplete logical structure) warrant extending this set of locutions. This paper formalises the use of�...
$58.00 30-day returns
Emphasising the individual perspectives of interlocutors and the function and acceptability of their reasoning in context.
Jul 28, 2021An enthymeme is a compressed syllogism. It allows people who share common assumptions to “collaborate on an inference,” as Thomas Farrell�...
Since our main objective is to account for the role enthymemes and topoi play in dialogue, we do not commit to any particular setup of the dgb from previous�...
Here we focus on inquiry dialogues that use enthymemes, which may stand ... for enthymeme inquiry dialogues. It takes the dialogue that the agents are�...
"In Enthymemes and Topoi in Dialogue, Ellen Breitholtz presents a novel and precise account of reasoning from an interactional perspective.
In Enthymemes and Topoi in Dialogue, Ellen Breitholtz presents a novel and precise account of reasoning from an interactional perspective.
Oct 2, 2024This paper proposes a way of representing enthymemes and arguments within the ASPIC+ framework, and how enthymemes are constructed based on�...