Google
Distinguishing between the voiceless fricatives F and TH is a difficult problem for both natural speech and synthetic speech.
Kazue Hata, Heather Moran, Steve Pearson: Distinguishing the voiceless fricatives f and TH in English: a study of relevant acoustic properties.
Distinguishing the voiceless fricatives f and TH in English: a study of relevant acoustic properties. Kazue Hata, Heather Moran, Steve Pearson.
People also ask
Unlike voiced fricatives, unvoiced fricatives are produced without effective vocal fold vibration, allowing us to avoid shadowing cues due to consonant voicing.
2000). These studies suggest that voiceless fricatives are characterized by higher spectral mean and peak values, more defined peaks, less variance, negative�...
Apr 6, 2014But for most English speakers (and ALL who are seen as educated and having any class) the "f" sound is a bottom lip against top front teeth�...
Missing: properties. | Show results with:properties.
Nov 1, 2022To determine whether there are significant differences in the pronunciation of English fricatives, spectral properties such as the center of�...
4 days agoNoise duration provides a robust cue to the voicing distinction, with voiceless fricatives having longer noise durations than voiced fricatives.
Different from their voiceless counterparts, the voiced fricatives have a substantial voicing bar occupying approximately the lower 400 Hz as shown in Figure�...
Missing: study relevant
Jun 1, 2009These studies suggest that voiceless fricatives are characterized by higher spectral mean and peak values, more defined peaks, less variance,�...