Google
We identify the maximal voting correspondence which is Condorcet Consistent and satisfies two participation conditions, namely the Top Property and the Bottom�...
Jun 25, 2017Keywords Voting, Condorcet Consistency, strong no show paradoxes, Minimax. Rule. JEL-classification D71, D72. ∗Maastricht University and�...
Downloadable! We consider voting correspondences that are, besides Condorcet Consistent, immune against the two strong no show paradoxes.
We identify the maximal voting correspondence with these properties. •. We show how we can select or not from this correspondence using a fixed ranking.
Nov 29, 2013A Condorcet winner is a candidate for election who is preferred by a majority in all pairwise comparisons with the other candidates. Condorcet's�...
The former participation condition says that if an alternative is in the chosen set at a profile of rankings and a ranking is added with that alternative on top�...
Downloadable (with restrictions)! We identify the maximal voting correspondence which is Condorcet Consistent and satisfies two participation conditions,�...
been termed as the No Show Paradox. This paper, which follows Moulin (1988) and extends some results from P�rez. (1995), explores the incidence�...
Nov 29, 2013then no Condorcet-consistent rule can satisfy Weak Positive Involvement. We use 37 potential voters in the proof. Theorem 2 If there are at�...
We identify the maximal voting correspondence which is Condorcet Consistent and satisfies two participation conditions, namely the Top Property and the�...