Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry McCaleb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Michael Connelly#Terry McCaleb. Nakon 22:50, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Terry McCaleb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional character long tagged for notability Wgolf (talk) 21:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Tagged in 2009, only reference is to IMDB, time for this one to go. AlbinoFerret 18:56, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I did find at least one critical analysis of the character (as portrayed in film), but it's arguably not the most reliable source: a work submitted for an English B.S. (not graduate degree): Arifin, Khoirudin Listiawan. Personality In Terry Mccaleb, The Major Character Of Blood Work Movie: A Psychoanalitic Approach. Diss. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 2014. (pdf). If a peer-reviewed or otherwise published version of the dissertation can be found, that would help satisfy WP:GNG, but we'd still need multiple sources. --Animalparty-- (talk) 21:57, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:33, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.