Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muruchi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Muruchi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not have references to establish notability, and it is a collection of in-universe details. TTN (talk) 19:34, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No real life information. ^King Jakob _C2 21:18, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:54, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Were this more than what appears to be a one-shot monster of the day, I might say that this should be redirected, but I fail to see a case for even that. Sven Manguard Wha? 08:48, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is largely a copy--in some cases word for word--from the Ultraman Wiki: [1]. While that is under a Creative Commons license, it still demands attribution. Unless attribution is given, we have to delete this or completely rewrite it. I don't see the need in either case. Michitaro (talk) 20:33, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked the history of the Ultraman Wiki and it looks like the copying was probably the other way around. Still, I don't see the need for such detailed in-universe info on Wikipedia if it's already somewhere else. Michitaro (talk) 21:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.