Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Stebbins
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:58, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Travis Stebbins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nominating for deletion instead of a speedy deletion, for it to be clearer of whether it should be deleted or not. Wagner u t c 18:47, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A somewhat famed Eurobeat producer, with an article that could be expanded. Wagner u t c 18:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment You cannot nominate an article for deletion and then !vote keep. Your nom is a de facto delete !vote automatically. You can't have both. 75.185.45.77 (talk) 13:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm pretty sure s/he can do what s/he likes. S/he removed a speedy delete tag, but felt it warranted a fuller discussion, in which s/he seeks to keep. Hence the de facto delete is vacated. Makes sense to me. 86.44.40.0 (talk) 14:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment You cannot nominate an article for deletion and then !vote keep. Your nom is a de facto delete !vote automatically. You can't have both. 75.185.45.77 (talk) 13:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article contains no reliable third party sources, and has no real claim of notability. Google searches for his name, as well as the various aliases brought up in the article, turns up no real reliable sources. Fails Wikipedia:Notability, and quite frankly, I can't see why the Speedy Delete tag was removed.Rorshacma (talk) 19:03, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no credible indication that individual meets notability criteria. RashersTierney (talk) 18:48, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.