Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pussy torture
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pussy torture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable subtopic of bdsm. The best source used in the article looks to be this Cosmopolitan article which does not mention torture or bdsm. Most of the rest of the sourcing is unreliable and/or self published. Anything remotely reliable doesn't discuss "pussy torture," or is not significant coverage. I suggest deletion with a merge of anything worthwhile to BDSM or some other target. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The article reads like a list and/or instruction manual, and has virtually no notable sources. Cortador (talk) 21:30, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. I've looked for reliable sources for this article, and I've come to the conclusion that it is not verifiable in terms of WP:RS, and that it is probably not notable enough for WP:GNG. The sources that do exist result in an article that resembles an instruction manual contrary to WP:NOTGUIDE. It contains a comparatively small amount of health risk information, and I'm concerned that this may violate WP:MEDRS. Polly Tunnel (talk) 11:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. A specialized topic will have references in specialized publications, as this one does. See also Murray, Thomas; Murrell, Thomas (1989-02-07). The Language of Sadomasochism: A Glossary and Linguistic Analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN 978-0-313-38783-8. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 15:42, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Does that source actually have significant coverage of the term? Searching the work via Google books returns no results for "pussy torture." ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:09, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- Лисан аль-Гаиб, I just checked the source, and pussy torture, cunt torture, vaginal torture, vulva torture, and female genitorture are not in the book. I've reverted your use of it as a source in the article and restored it to the further reading section. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.