Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Appearance
AutoWikiBrowser
- Tomandjerry311 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- My previous account, Tomandjerry211, had the right to use AWB. However, I lost my account password, forcing me to switch to my alt account. After a [[1]] at the noticeboard, my account name was changed, my old account was blocked, and my previous user rights were given back. However, they never specified if I am allowed to used this tool, so I am just double-checking. Tomandjerry311 (need to talk?) 15:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Tomandjerry311: I have no problem regranting you the right, but AWB has potential to be used for high-volume vandalism. Could you affirm that you've read Wikipedia:User account security? Also, could you consider setting up a committed identity, as detailed at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-05-14/Committed identity? ~ Rob13Talk 16:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- I have read that page and made my password slightly more secure. I may consider setting up a committed identity.Tomandjerry311 (need to talk?) 14:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done (and previous account removed). ~ Rob13Talk 20:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Tomandjerry311: I have no problem regranting you the right, but AWB has potential to be used for high-volume vandalism. Could you affirm that you've read Wikipedia:User account security? Also, could you consider setting up a committed identity, as detailed at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-05-14/Committed identity? ~ Rob13Talk 16:38, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Baldusi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I've noticed that most corrections I get are done with AWB. I usually try to edit in the rocketry and spaceflight sections where I handle tens and sometimes hundreds. Baldusi (talk) 20:58, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done Widr (talk) 15:38, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks! - Baldusi (talk) 16:43, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Done Widr (talk) 15:38, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- WikiTryHardDieHard (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I usually edit with LanguageTool. I am requesting AWB access to improve my editing efficiency.--WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 01:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Kernosky (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I would like to make quick, typo fixing edits. Kernosky talk2me! 13:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not done With under 500 edits over three years, you haven't quite shown the experience needed to be trusted with AWB. Since AWB allows for high edit rates, we need to see enough of a record to assess whether those edits will be strictly net positives. ~ Rob13Talk 14:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)