From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|---|
| Common | |
|---|
| Uncommon | |
|---|
| Logs | |
|---|
| Special | |
|---|
Rollback
- I have 200 Edit To Userpage And Talk Page request rollback revert vandalism MasterChiefToolWiki23 (Talk|Contrib) 11:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1][2]) and has 53 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 11:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]- Oppose This user shows no understanding of what vandalism is [3].--Jetstreamer Talk 13:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree only 53 mainspace edits, but the problem is that as Jetstreamer said, this user shows no understanding of what vandalism is — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kostas20142 (talk • contribs) 14:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]- Disagree At the time you requested, you only had 53 edits in the mainspace and when you hit request, it says that if you have under 200 edits, you wouldn't be a likely choice. Most of the edits are on userpages so I don't think you have enough experience with editing articles.IExistToHelp (talk) 22:49, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Per above. In simplified English: @ToolWiki23: Your English is not very good, which is a problem. Looking at your SUL, I'm guessing your native language is Indonesian. I would recommend working on Indonesian wikis. Here you must be good at English if you want to fight vandalism, because new users will ask you questions and you will need to respond understandably. So if you could, please stop patrolling the English Wikipedia for the time being. Thank you for understanding — MusikAnimal talk 19:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you i declined request rollback if using Twinkle. --MasterChiefToolWiki23 (Talk|Contrib) 08:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm starting to suspect this user is trying to use machine translation to edit here. That's not ok. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jetstreamer, Kostas20142, and IExistToHelp: "Clerking" requests for permissions is unnecessary. Administrators are more than capable of reviewing contributions and determining whether an editor is qualified for a user right. Permissions are not accorded based on a !vote, and community input is only helpful on some of the more advanced ones (such as template editor, where experienced template editors may be able to make helpful comments). ~ Rob13Talk 03:49, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @BU Rob13: I expressed my opinion. It was the first one for this request and was not meant to start a poll. I don't see anything wrong in doing it and will continue doing so anytime I consider it is worth to.--Jetstreamer Talk 13:02, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @BU Rob13: I also expressed my opinion, this isnt a poll. I don't see anything wrong in doing it either and will continue doing so anytime I consider it is worth to as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kostas20142 (talk • contribs) 16:43, March 19, 2017 (UTC)
- @Jetstreamer and Kostas20142: With respect to both of you, I think what Rob means is that this isn't really a discussion either; this is merely a page where users can post requests for administrators. Unless there is something truly exceptional, it's unnecessary for other editors to add their input. (I'm saying this as a former non-admin who once did the exact same thing.) This case wasn't particularly exceptional: an admin would have quickly seen that the user fell short of the 200 mainspace edits guideline. It's not that your input isn't welcome – I certainly appreciate it – rather, your time would be better spent elsewhere. Mz7 (talk) 03:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Requesting for right rollback i have 200 edit in mainspace in article and request rollback revert vandalism— Enaya Afzal Siddiqui talk 02:42, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment This user has had 3 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4][5][6]). — MusikBot talk 05:12, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Enaya Afzal: Your english may be poor, but this is not going to happen anytime soon. You've been told no 3 times now in past 90 days (this is the 4th). If you come back here again during the next 90 days it will be considered disruptive, and a block levied on your account to reduce the administrative burden. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Not done — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I have amassed several hundred anti-vandalism edits, most using Twinkle. I'd like rollback as it will expand my toolkit for patrolling recent changes and also enable me to use other semi-automated tools (many of which require rollback) to enhance the quality and efficiency of my work. My CSD log is also available as evidence of my competence. Triptothecottage (talk) 02:45, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done – Juliancolton | Talk 04:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I have been a regular vandalism patroller. I started with manual editing, but have recently transitioned to Twinkle and would like to further expand my toolbox. Beta7 (talk) 11:31, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Done — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 11:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I have been reverting vandalism for a while now and have been monitoring the recent changes page for any changes that have been flagged as possibly vandalism and reverting them if they are indeed vandalism. I would like rollback permission so that I could revert vandalism easier. Thank you for your consideration and have a nice day :) ThatGirlTayler (talk) 00:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment This user has 164 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 00:02, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only 164 edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. The majority of your contributions were made in the past few days, so please keep up the good work for a couple months and then reapply. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:58, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
