Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

• Jóhannesbjarki (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Creating many articles on species that don't appear to need patrolling. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:48, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done for six months. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:50, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Mustafdesam (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Mustafdesam (talk) 06:45, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have been creating reliably sourced articles for the past 11 years. I mainly write articles based on films, film technicians, writers, artists, and painters on a regular basis. I would like to have requests for permission for auto-patrolled. Thank you  Mustafdesam (talk) 12:15, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) The recent block for copyright violations and the declined AfC drafts, along with the recent G11 notice don’t usually create “clean” articles. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 09:16, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done But please return upon having acquired more experience. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Curbon7 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^(notify)

User:Curbon7 has created 81 articles, of which 7 have been deleted. Of these, two were deleted to make way for a page move (G6) and three were G7'd. The other two deserve a bit more of an explanation. Alexander Mamasidikov was deleted per WP:G5, which I would guess is because he lost control of his account around that time. Currently, he has the 2FA tester group, which I assume he makes use of. Finally, there is William J. Meade. He created the page, but later realized that the subject did not meet GNG. He was able to recognize that G7 was not applicable, so he PROD'd his own creation. Someone dePROD'd the page, so he took himself to AfD. In sum, I do not believe he needs new page patrollers to look after his work, because he looks after himself. HouseBlaster^talk 21:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For clarification, the weird G5 thing was because I moved someone's sandbox draft to draftspace (thus me creating a redirect from their sandbox), they removed the redirect and created a new sandbox draft, that got moved to mainspace, and it all got deleted anyways because they were a blocked user. That's why I show up as having that G5; no edits were made during the period my account was compromised, as it was instantly locked. Additionally, the other ones besides Meade were redirects that I G7'd, or G6s. Regardless, thanks for the nom. Curbon7 (talk) 22:24, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]