Talk:2010 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Usernameunique (talk · contribs) 12:55, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Candidates
- Were there any others, even if not their candidacies weren't realistic?
Campaign
- "2010 primary elections" — Anything to link to?
- "Before the switch, the Democratic establishment had encouraged Sestak to run in the Democratic primary" — We know Specter is the Republican senator at this point, but who is Sestak? This would be a good place to introduce him.
- "after Specter switched parties he was largely embraced by such major Democratic figures" — Why?
- "Specter led Sestak by more than 20 percentage points" — In public polls, presumably.
- "attacking his House attendance record" — So he was a congressman?
- "a position in the Obama administration" — Any idea what position?
- "no formal investigation was ever held" — Do you "hold" an investigation? "Opened" might be a better word.
Results
- "The Democratic primary occurred on May 18, 2010. Although Specter had won endorsement from the Pennsylvania Democratic Party, at 10:14 PM EDT that evening, the Associated Press projected the race as won by Sestak." — This feels out of place. It's probably incorporated into the above paragraphs.
Background
- "In a December 2008 interview" — Run-on sentence.
- "dozens of Pennsylvanians urged to challenge Specter" — urged Toomey?
Specter switches parties
- "Senator Jim DeMint" — What state?
Toomey jumps ahead
- town hall — Anything to link to?
Final primary months
- "the health-care plan before Congress" — Anything to link to?
- "$2.3 million to his total $4.1 million war chest" — For this and the numbers in this sentence, is it $4.1 million after adding in the $2.3 million? Or $4.1 million plus $2.3 million.
- "Toomey the best-funded Senate challenger in the country during the 2010 elections" — To that point? Or as of the elections?
Results
- Again, this seems like it would be better suited above "Polling"