Talk:Turkey: Difference between revisions
→Republic of Türkiye: Reply |
→Poll: option 1 |
||
Line 307: | Line 307: | ||
* '''Option 2''': Since various intergovernmental organizations like the [https://turkiye.un.org/ United Nations], [https://www.turkkon.org/en/uye-ulkeler/TR Organization of Turkic States] and [https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/declassified_191048.htm?selectedLocale=en NATO] starting to call it Türkiye. Shows clearly that this name is internationally accepted. And not to mention that Turkish constitution's English version starts to use [https://global.tbmm.gov.tr/DownloadFile?fileId=a880a8e4-7e68-45ae-8f38-0182f7e0d82f Republic of Türkiye]. Another precedent is [[Ivory Coast]]: {{tq|Ivory Coast, also known as Côte d'Ivoire, officially the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire}}. [[User:Beshogur|Beshogur]] ([[User talk:Beshogur|talk]]) 21:52, 27 September 2022 (UTC) |
* '''Option 2''': Since various intergovernmental organizations like the [https://turkiye.un.org/ United Nations], [https://www.turkkon.org/en/uye-ulkeler/TR Organization of Turkic States] and [https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/declassified_191048.htm?selectedLocale=en NATO] starting to call it Türkiye. Shows clearly that this name is internationally accepted. And not to mention that Turkish constitution's English version starts to use [https://global.tbmm.gov.tr/DownloadFile?fileId=a880a8e4-7e68-45ae-8f38-0182f7e0d82f Republic of Türkiye]. Another precedent is [[Ivory Coast]]: {{tq|Ivory Coast, also known as Côte d'Ivoire, officially the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire}}. [[User:Beshogur|Beshogur]] ([[User talk:Beshogur|talk]]) 21:52, 27 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
* '''Option 2''': ([https://www.uefa.com/uefanationsleague/teams/135--turkiye/ UEFA too.]) Similar case to Ivory Coast, as stated above. Or at least do asymetric "Option 2A" - Turkey, officially the Republic of Türkiye.[[User:Chrz|Chrz]] ([[User talk:Chrz|talk]]) 22:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC) |
* '''Option 2''': ([https://www.uefa.com/uefanationsleague/teams/135--turkiye/ UEFA too.]) Similar case to Ivory Coast, as stated above. Or at least do asymetric "Option 2A" - Turkey, officially the Republic of Türkiye.[[User:Chrz|Chrz]] ([[User talk:Chrz|talk]]) 22:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
* '''Option 1''' What does "officially" mean in this context? Normally the legal and therefore "official" name of a country is defined under the laws and constitution of that country ''in the language of that country''. How that is translated into foreign languages is not normally defined by the laws of that country. Hence all the Wikipedia country articles where the name of the country is not in English says "officially X" and then gives the local language name. That's not because it is "officially" called that in English - it's a shorthand for "officially [name in local language] which reliable sources translate as X in English". In the WP context it's the most effective way of communicating to english speakers the official name in the country's language. It never is a statement as to the "officiality" of the English translation. There is in fact an implicit ''de facto'' overlap with [[WP:COMMONNAME]]. There is only one official name for the Republic of Turkey and that's ''Türkiye Cumhuriyeti'' under the law and constitution of Turkey and nothing has changed that. reliable sources continue to translate that in English as "Republic of Turkey". No law has been enacted in Turkey determining an "official" name in English (the presidential memo isn't a law and he has no authority to enact one). The UN - despite the much touted "registration" isn't, in this context, some international registry of official state names in English. all that's happened there is that they've acceded to Erdoğan's request to have the name plate in the assembly and on the website changed. [[User:DeCausa|DeCausa]] ([[User talk:DeCausa|talk]]) 22:19, 27 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
=== Other proposals === |
=== Other proposals === |
Revision as of 22:19, 27 September 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Turkey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
To-do list for Turkey:
Guidelines for editing the Turkey article
|
This talk page has too many pastel-coloured boxes. Please stop adding them, otherwise the discussion will fall off the bottom of the page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Template:Vital article Template:Outline of knowledge coverage
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated, especially about the article's title. Please read recent comments, look in the archives, and review the FAQ before commenting on that topic. |
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Requested move 20 January 2022
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 19:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Turkey → Türkiye – The country has changed its English name to Türkiye. 2600:6C5A:657F:D1F5:48D3:2853:9745:8762 (talk) 03:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Won't happen as everyone will keep referring to them as Turkey! Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 03:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose for now, per WP:COMMONNAME. Even in the period after Erdogan's December memo, 'Turkey' predominates in English-language sources. News in the past 48 hours has described the name change as an ongoing process, with unclear timelines. It's far too soon to make a call on this, and I propose a short moratorium on requested moves until other governments, inter-governmental agencies, and news media can react to moves by the country. Firefangledfeathers 03:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. Obviously way too soon for such a major change. Wikipedia does not lead, it follows. But if this ever does catch on and the article gets moved, then Turkey (bird) should be moved to Turkey. Rreagan007 (talk) 04:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Since the bird is named for the country, we'll have to change its name to "Türkiye" also to be consistent. :) BilCat (talk) 16:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. As stated above, the most common in the English-language name for the nation is Turkey. Perhaps if media and other sources follow suit with using Türkiye, there would be a stronger argument for the change. ExRat (talk) 05:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. Alex2006 (talk) 06:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:USEENGLISH and WP:COMMONNAME. Turkiye or its equivalent only used by Turkey major English sources. 125.167.57.203 (talk) 07:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME, until the preponderance of reliable English language sources routinely use the spelling "Türkiye". Cullen328 (talk) 07:58, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose No sign WP:COMMONNAME has changed, as stated above. This needs more than a memo from Erdogan to change it - WP:RS English-language usage has to change before we change. DeCausa (talk) 08:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Firefangledfeathers. Slightly off-topic, this website [1] use the new spelling, but this [2] doesn't yet. Apparently, the word "Turkish" is still ok per government.[3] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. The name change is not even adopted yet by the largest two Turkish media in English language, Hurriyet Daily News and Daily Sabah, who continue to use "Turkey" as of now. Due mention of the name change can be slowly phased in if usage in local and global English-language media actually increases. Once the name change will be established and dominate in a wide range of sources (which is entirely WP:CRYSTALBALL), we can address the page title again. –Austronesier (talk) 12:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose the English name is Turkey, not "Türkiye". Super Ψ Dro 13:41, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Turkish Constiution. Shadow4dark (talk) 13:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose - obviously not the common name. The limit should probably be the lede sentence and a mention in the prose. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. This should be a snow close at this point, as it's obvious this RM will fail. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support and make this title a DAB, no clear primary topic for "Turkey". Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale: could you provide a rationale for your !vote? Firefangledfeathers 19:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Firefangledfeathers: A combination of WP:NATURAL, alternative names may be used to settle titles by using alternative names as well as WP:NOPRIMARY for "Turkey". Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale: could you provide a rationale for your !vote? Firefangledfeathers 19:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. I would note that we have no reason to assume that Türkiye will ever be used a an English word by native English speakers. If we accept Crouch, Swale's argument above, the correct response would be the one they proposed at the August RM. Kahastok talk 18:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- My point was partly the fact that the country is probably going to sometimes be called "Turkey" and sometimes "Türkiye" so this reduces the chances of the country being primary for "Turkey". Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:21, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- Support per noWP:NAMECHANGES.--Ortizesp (talk) 19:17, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
- WP:NAMECHANGES would support retaining 'Turkey', as independent, reliable sources since the name change are continuing to use 'Turkey'. See, for example, the first five new pieces I found searching for 'Erdogan': Bloomberg, Wall Street Journal, Times of Israel, The Defense Post, and Reuters]. All but Reuters use 'Turkey' exclusively, and Reuters uses neither version. Firefangledfeathers 19:27, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
RfC on the official name of the country in the lede
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: There's consensus for Option 1. Among the cited arguments is that the country's name has not been officially changed at the UN. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 17:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Which of the following two should be the article's lede sentence?
- Turkey (Template:Lang-tr [ˈtyɾcije]), officially the Republic of Turkey (Template:Lang-tr [ˈtyɾcije dʒumˈhuːɾijeti] )
- Turkey (Template:Lang-tr [ˈtyɾcije]), officially the Republic of Türkiye (Template:Lang-tr [ˈtyɾcije dʒumˈhuːɾijeti] )
Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}}
on reply) 19:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Poll
- Option 2. The most official name in English is "Türkiye", not "Turkey". WP:COMMONNAME doesn't apply here because we're discussing what we should describe the official name as, not what we should title or describe the country as in the text. Chess (talk) (please use
{{reply to|Chess}}
on reply) 19:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC) - Option 1 We do not base wikipedia articles off the statements of Turkish state media. The UN still lists Turkey's name as "Turkey" and it is still WP:COMMONNAME so I suggest Option 1 unless there is some sort of official law mandating the change.
- We do when we're discussing what name is "official". Chess (talk) (please use
{{reply to|Chess}}
on reply) 18:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- There is still no official act of the Grand National Assembly mandating this name change. Erdoğan can flaunt his nationalist agenda all he wants, but I am only willing to change my answer if there is a specific law for changing the name. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 19:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- We do when we're discussing what name is "official". Chess (talk) (please use
- Option 2 The Turkish government is using the name "Republic of Türkiye" and the article should be in line with other articles such as the Ivory Coast with "Republic of Côte d'Ivoire" even if is not the common English name of the country.--Kappasi (talk) 17:47, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Option 2 for neutrality, so that both spellings of the name (Turkey, Türkiye) are represented. Khestwol (talk) 17:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Option 1 It’s misleading to say this is a new “official” name. What has happened is much more limited than that. This is Erdogan’s circular of 3 December and this is Hürriyet Daily News’s coverage of it. What the circular actually says is that “Made in Türkiye” should be stamped on exports - that’s the focus of the circular. As far as other usage is concerned, it says “necessary sensitivity will be shown on the use of the phrase ‘Türkiye’ instead of phrases such as ‘Turkey,’ ‘Turkei,’ ‘Turquie’ etc.”. Erdogan doesn’t under the constitution have the power to determine an “official name” for the country and the circular doesn’t claim that this is the official name in English. Some of the Turkish media have got very excited about this and there’s plenty of exaggerated references to an “official name” but I don’t believe any such media coverage is WP:RS for the legal position, which is this is about, per WP:RSCONTEXT. DeCausa (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Türkiye is used by most government departments now on their official English language websites, not just for products made in Turkey.Kappasi (talk) Kappasi (talk) 20:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- that doesn’t make it the “official name” and there are departments that don’t use it. DeCausa (talk) 20:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Türkiye is used by most government departments now on their official English language websites, not just for products made in Turkey.Kappasi (talk) Kappasi (talk) 20:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Option 1 The official name of the country has not changed. It is still Türkiye Cumhuriyeti. We translate it by its components the way these are translated in common usage: Türkiye → "Turkey" Cumhuriyet → "Republic". The current government has chosen to promote "Turkiye" as translation for Türkiye, and hence "Republic of Türkiye" for Türkiye Cumhuriyeti, but that does not affect the rendering of the official name in WP based on common usage. –Austronesier (talk) 18:30, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- Option 1. As far as I can tell, Erdogan did not declare "Republic of Türkiye" to be the country's official name. His memo expressed his wish that "Türkiye" be used as the brand of the nation in official publications and communications, mentioning "Made in Türkiye" in particular. No mention of what the official name in English should be. Many sources covering this in the following months have made it clear that this is an ongoing process, including by getting the UN to change the way it refers to the country. No source presented so far has said that this has actually happened. The UN is still using "Republic of Turkey". Major Turkish governmental institutions, including its national legislature and highest court, are still prominently using "Turkey", with the Constitutional Court using the full "Republic of Turkey". English language news media is continuing to use "Republic of Turkey" over "of "Türkiye" by about 5:1, according to Google News hits over the past month. Even Turkey's executive branch does not seem to have settled on its final choice. As of February, Erdogan was considering dropping the diacritic mark from the u. Nothing official has happened when it comes to "Republic of Türkiye" yet. We'll know when it's official because the whole Turkish government, other nations, intergovernmental organizations, and news media will shift. That has not happened. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Option 1 for now. As I read from some sources (here, here and here, for instance), Turkey is registering the new name at the UN. I would switch to Option 2 when this registration will become official. P1221 (talk) 07:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Why would “registering” the name at the UN make a difference? The UN doesn’t have a function as an “official name” registry. Might as well check the registration at the International Poultry Council. DeCausa (talk) 12:49, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- The UN does have this function actually, assigned to UNGEGN. Even without this, a submission to any international body, in general, would be a useful sign that the name change was serious. In line with that, I note that the International Poultry Council still refers to the country as "Turkey". CMD (talk) 13:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- They may well be the last hold out for the old name…UNGEGN is an “experts forum” for cartographic consistency, as I understand it. I don’t think a country can “register” their preferences with them. Basically, what Turkey has done has put in their request for what goes on the name plaque that they sit behind. DeCausa (talk) 13:31, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- The UN does have this function actually, assigned to UNGEGN. Even without this, a submission to any international body, in general, would be a useful sign that the name change was serious. In line with that, I note that the International Poultry Council still refers to the country as "Turkey". CMD (talk) 13:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Some of NATO and Organisation of Turkic States seems to use this. Beshogur (talk) 13:10, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Why would “registering” the name at the UN make a difference? The UN doesn’t have a function as an “official name” registry. Might as well check the registration at the International Poultry Council. DeCausa (talk) 12:49, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Option 1. Despite "Republic of Türkiye" is currently being used by the top official bodies, it has not been declared as the official name of the country. It is more of a governmental preference than an official name. Nozdref (talk) 11:15, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- It's more official than "Republic of Turkey". Chess (talk) (please use
{{reply to|Chess}}
on reply) 19:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- It's more official than "Republic of Turkey". Chess (talk) (please use
- Option 1 If Option 1 wins and Option 2 subsequently becomes registered with the UN and put into use, we can re-open this RfC. SportingFlyer T·C 15:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- Option 2. why not mention the name they have chosen to use ? Article title and first mention still common name with native name mentioned.Moxy- 16:11, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- Türkiye is already mentioned, and is the third word of the first sentence, in the article currently, and in both options. The issue isn’t about mentioning it, it’s whether, in addition to that, it should also be stated the “official name” is “Republic of Türkiye”. DeCausa (talk) 18:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support
Turkey ..., officially the Republic of Turkey or Türkiye ...
not sure for infobox. Maybe Republic of Turkey / Türkiye. Beshogur (talk) 13:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC) - Option 1 Per other users, this dictat was not a constitutional change nor a law, and seems to only apply to official organizations. Not only that, it doesn't seem to catch on outside of Turkish governmental media outlets, which seem to be obliged to follow this decree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ido66667 (talk • contribs) 20:53, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Option 2 The Official name is Republic of Türkiye so we should use it.Yousef Raz (talk) 22:59, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
- Option 1 Until such time as it is clear that international bodies - such as the UN - have adopted this form. Pincrete (talk) 15:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- Has been done...just waiting on UN [4] Moxy- 21:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, that source doesn’t say it has been done. In fact, all the sources to date seem to say that Turkey is planning to do it with no confirmation that it has been done yet, eg this which said back in January that it was going to be done “in the coming weeks”. DeCausa (talk) 22:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- yup done all over just not at the UN yet.....Why are we waiting on the UN...is it the only source we can use? What is wrong with the constitution? Seem odd for us to wait on one single source when we have many that are much more relevent. Moxy- 22:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- It’s not in the constitution and no one’s using it much. DeCausa (talk) 22:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't knew that Turkey's Turkish constitution talked about English name of its name. I don't think so. Also Organization of Turkic States and some NATO bodies started to use the name "Türkiye". Beshogur (talk) 14:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Exactly. DeCausa (talk) 15:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- I didn't knew that Turkey's Turkish constitution talked about English name of its name. I don't think so. Also Organization of Turkic States and some NATO bodies started to use the name "Türkiye". Beshogur (talk) 14:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- It’s not in the constitution and no one’s using it much. DeCausa (talk) 22:18, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- yup done all over just not at the UN yet.....Why are we waiting on the UN...is it the only source we can use? What is wrong with the constitution? Seem odd for us to wait on one single source when we have many that are much more relevent. Moxy- 22:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, that source doesn’t say it has been done. In fact, all the sources to date seem to say that Turkey is planning to do it with no confirmation that it has been done yet, eg this which said back in January that it was going to be done “in the coming weeks”. DeCausa (talk) 22:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- Option 1 (as) Per other users mentioned the needed explanation. Ali Ahwazi (talk) 20:54, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- Option 1 is more common in English. --Seggallion (talk) 15:41, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Option 1 for consistency. Turkey (Turkish: Türkiye), officially the Republic of Turkey (Turkish: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti) Some1 (talk) 01:44, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Option 1 per P1221. BilledMammal (talk) 03:21, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Option 1 makes the most sense for the English wiki. — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Join WP:FINANCE! 00:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Other proposal
I think there’s an Option 3 to reflect that Erdoğan has launched a campaign to have Türkiye adopted in foreign language use even if it isn’t actually an “official name” change. I suggest adding a footnote to the words “…officially the Republic of Turkey…” in the first sentence which says:
This, I think, more accurately reflects that this is about a campaign to encourage a change of usage rather than an “official” name change, which overstates what’s happening. DeCausa (talk) 12:44, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
- That's unnecessary and UNDUE, IMHO. Turkey#Name is a more fitting place for that, not a footnote in the lead. Some1 (talk) 01:53, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ "'Say Türkiye' campaign to promote changing country's int'l name starts". Hürriyet Daily News. 17 February 2022. Retrieved 15 April 2022.
- ^ Soylu, Ragip (17 January 2022). "Turkey to register its new name Türkiye to UN in coming weeks". Middle East Eye. Retrieved 11 April 2022.
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 August 2022
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The GDP Nominal is Wrong, The 2021 GDP was 815 Billion Dollars According to The World Bank
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=TR
No Further Data Of 2022 Were Officially Published And The Estimate Is Very Very Unreasonable Considering Turkey Has One Of the Fastest Growing Economies, Experts Expect A Rise Of Around 3% In The Economy, So My Suggestion Is That Either You Change The GDP Nominal To “815 Billion $ (2021)” Or a More Reasonable Estimate, Thanks. HusCch (talk) 20:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- I feel a bit unsure as the other source is of the International Monetary Fund (also prominent) and those numbers of a growing economy can be correct knowing of the devaluation of the lira of more than 100% within the last year. Maybe Turkish Gov. POV?, not that POV is wrong, but maybe in that case a more qualified opinion would be helpful.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{edit extended-protected}}
template. The IMF indicated about 806 for 2021 GDP which is much closer to the proposed 815 number put forth by TWB, also for 2021. However the number currently cited in the article is the 2022 estimate. This type of change represents a decision to use the older 2021 estimates rather than those for 2022. It may be okay but it's the type of thing that should reach consensus here first. --N8wilson 🔔 13:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Picture of president + main opposition leader
@Randam: actually you should've opened this thread. Can you show me a single example where opposition leaders are equally placed with the president on politics section? Beshogur (talk) 16:47, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- (Let me start by thanking you on taking the initiative to start this talk.)
- 1) IMO it's not relevant to show another example, because every format on wikipedia was once a first. See it as pioneering if you need. It's also irrelevant, because I could have given orders to a friend to make a similar change on a article with low traction or in which people didn't care, let's say Cambodia or Botswana. Then I would have said "Look, they have it in Cambodia and Botswana. Case closed."
- 2) I also disagree with the term "equally" placed. Putting pictures next to each other doesn't make them equal, just like putting one above the other doesn't make one better. In South Korea, the President and Prime Minister are next to each other and they are anything but equal. South Korean president is both head of state and head of government.
- 3) What is relevant is that the picture is mentioned in the text. Which is the case here.
- 4) It also helps elobrate the Turkish political dynamics. That in Turkey there is constantly an organized opposition to the government and that Turkey is not a one-party dictatorship like China, like some people on the internet think. That elections matter. --Randam (talk) 23:44, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
- Well PM and President are equal, because they have tasks by ruling the country, while the main opposition leader is mere a main opposition leader. I think you could put him somewhere, but placing equally is simply absurd. I would like to hear other people as well. Beshogur (talk) 11:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- I also feel that the suggested double picture gives undue prominence to Kılıçdaroğlu. His picture could be placed at the third paragraph (describing the multi-party system) or the fourth (where he is mentioned). --T*U (talk) 10:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed. While it is true that each article has it's own consensus and what happens in other country articles doesn't have to be followed here (per Randam), this article should be the last to give that sort of prominence to the opposition leader given Recep Tayyip Erdoğan#Authoritarianism. DeCausa (talk) 11:56, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- I also feel that the suggested double picture gives undue prominence to Kılıçdaroğlu. His picture could be placed at the third paragraph (describing the multi-party system) or the fourth (where he is mentioned). --T*U (talk) 10:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Well PM and President are equal, because they have tasks by ruling the country, while the main opposition leader is mere a main opposition leader. I think you could put him somewhere, but placing equally is simply absurd. I would like to hear other people as well. Beshogur (talk) 11:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Primary language
Turkish is not the predominant language although Turkey has minorities and respects them and also is open to welcome everyone. The country has one official language and it is Turkish. 2003:C9:F15:9B00:EDCF:B4D1:A7C4:7FDD (talk) 00:11, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- According to [5](page 19), as of 2006 Turkish was the mother tongue of 84.6% of the people of Turkey, and 87.5% used it as a daily language. Seems predominant to me. Have the figures changed much since then? Largoplazo (talk) 01:19, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Republic of Türkiye
@ValarianB: @Spekkios: I would like to ask, do not change such thing without a consensus. We discussed the lead several times. Yet Turkey calls it officially "Republic of Türkiye" and had been submitted to the UN, and you both trying to restore the old name, which isn't used anymore since months. This is beyond disruptive, and edit warring. Beshogur (talk) 13:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Beshogur (talk) 13:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hello @Black Kite: Please check previous rfc, the main reasons were "name change not done by the UN yet". However this changed (see examples above) and Ivory Coast example (Republic of Côte d'Ivoire). You're reverting it back to wrong version, without checking that this lead had remained for a while. Beshogur (talk) 18:12, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
The consensus is here. Unless I am mistaken, the consensus has not changed --Spekkios (talk) 18:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Do you see the closing reason? Beshogur (talk) 19:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- "Among the cited arguments" is not the same as "the only cited argument". --Spekkios (talk) 19:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- What's your reasoning for the official name change then? You say wp:commonname, nobody's changing wp:comonname. Beshogur (talk) 20:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Beshogur, what's your definition of "official name" for the purposes of the English translation in the first sentence of country articles? DeCausa (talk) 20:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Official name that the country defines itself in English language texts. Otherwise the "officially" has no purpose. Regarding the use "Türkiye" alone beside, Turkey. Turkish news agencies, and particular supranational organizations that Turkey is part of it uses that as well in favor of Turkey. Beshogur (talk) 20:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Can you break that down for me? "that the country defines itself in English language texts". what exactly does that mean? How does "the country" do that? Is it by law, for instance? And also including "news agencies" needs explanation. "news agencies" are mostly private commercial organisations or is that not the case in turkey? And "supranational organizations that Turkey is part of". What if they are different to what is "officially" used within the country? the reason I'm asking these questions is to identify what you consider to be the objective grounds that could apply to any country and then apply them to Turkey, rather than the other way around i.e. "this has happened in Turkey and therefore that makes it the official name". DeCausa (talk) 20:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry but my answer was pretty much clear. You could see various examples by various users as well. And some months ago you told
It’s not in the constitution and no one’s using it much.
No they do. Beshogur (talk) 20:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)- Ok, so you don't want to answer my questions. There's no obligation for you to do so. (By the way, that's a translation of the constitution. It's not the constitution which in law is only in Turkish). DeCausa (talk) 20:58, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- And as a result the only "official" name in law and under the constitution is "Türkiye Cumhuriyeti" and nothing else. DeCausa (talk) 21:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- We're talking about English right now. If your argument was correct, we wouldn't use "officially" on every single country (in case they have an alternate name). Beshogur (talk) 21:37, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- If you're not willing to engage in the central points I raised I don't see that we can have a productive discussion if we dance around the periphery only. DeCausa (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- We're talking about English right now. If your argument was correct, we wouldn't use "officially" on every single country (in case they have an alternate name). Beshogur (talk) 21:37, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry but my answer was pretty much clear. You could see various examples by various users as well. And some months ago you told
- Can you break that down for me? "that the country defines itself in English language texts". what exactly does that mean? How does "the country" do that? Is it by law, for instance? And also including "news agencies" needs explanation. "news agencies" are mostly private commercial organisations or is that not the case in turkey? And "supranational organizations that Turkey is part of". What if they are different to what is "officially" used within the country? the reason I'm asking these questions is to identify what you consider to be the objective grounds that could apply to any country and then apply them to Turkey, rather than the other way around i.e. "this has happened in Turkey and therefore that makes it the official name". DeCausa (talk) 20:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Official name that the country defines itself in English language texts. Otherwise the "officially" has no purpose. Regarding the use "Türkiye" alone beside, Turkey. Turkish news agencies, and particular supranational organizations that Turkey is part of it uses that as well in favor of Turkey. Beshogur (talk) 20:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Beshogur, what's your definition of "official name" for the purposes of the English translation in the first sentence of country articles? DeCausa (talk) 20:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- What's your reasoning for the official name change then? You say wp:commonname, nobody's changing wp:comonname. Beshogur (talk) 20:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- "Among the cited arguments" is not the same as "the only cited argument". --Spekkios (talk) 19:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
What are those central points. You say the official name is Türkiye Cumhuriyeti. That's simply untrue. There are English official names of every single country. We're not supposed to use Türkiye Cumhuriyeti. If that was the case, then Republic of Turkey wasn't an official name either. Beshogur (talk) 22:12, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Because that was the concensus established by the RfC. --Spekkios (talk) 21:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Re read my comment please, that's not what I am saying. Beshogur (talk) 22:17, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Because that was the concensus established by the RfC. --Spekkios (talk) 21:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Beshogur is right. The circumstances on which the consensus was reached do not apply anymore today. A lot of people who voted for "option 1" said they support "option 2" if it became the UN name, which is the case now. To say that "Republic of Turkey" is the official name is not a matter of taste or wp:commonname anymore. It's just plain wrong.
- It makes no sense to cling on old consensuses when circumstances have clearly changed. I have made this case recently here without any opposition. This version is balanced. --Randam (talk) 20:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- The circumstances have not changed. While many users cited the United Nations, that does not mean that was the only reason that concensus was reached. The RfC stands, and you cannot unilaterally override it. --Spekkios (talk) 21:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) That may or may not be the case. Either way it needs a new RfC to establish current consensus. WP:EDITCONSENSUS is clear. "An edit has presumed consensus until it is disputed or reverted". The edit contrary to the RfC has been disputed and reverted so the reverted edit can only form a new consensus by means of an RfC. DeCausa (talk) 21:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Official name ≠ common name. For many countries it does equal, but in general there are exceptions.
- "name change not done by the UN yet" was bad argument to begin with, an excuse. There are far better reasons why not to use Turkiye on Wikipedia (yet). For example Google news shows me 298 000 news about Tukey in the last week, 46 400 for Türkiye (and many of those are Turkish sources written in English). It is rough but fitting evaluation. Chrz (talk) 21:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Nobody's changing the commonname. This is about the lede. Beshogur (talk) 21:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- OK then but I am not sure that anyone got that. Hence the opposition. Chrz (talk) 22:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Nobody's changing the commonname. This is about the lede. Beshogur (talk) 21:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Opened rfc. Beshogur (talk) 21:58, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
RfC on the official name of the country in the lede (2)
|
Per discussion above, I am going to repeat this RfC, with a small change.
Which of the following two should be the article's lede sentence?
- Turkey (Template:Lang-tr [ˈtyɾcije]), officially the Republic of Turkey (Template:Lang-tr [ˈtyɾcije dʒumˈhuːɾijeti] )
- Turkey or Türkiye (Template:Lang-tr [ˈtyɾcije]), officially the Republic of Türkiye (Template:Lang-tr [ˈtyɾcije dʒumˈhuːɾijeti] )
Beshogur (talk) 21:52, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Poll
- Option 2: Since various intergovernmental organizations like the United Nations, Organization of Turkic States and NATO starting to call it Türkiye. Shows clearly that this name is internationally accepted. And not to mention that Turkish constitution's English version starts to use Republic of Türkiye. Another precedent is Ivory Coast:
Ivory Coast, also known as Côte d'Ivoire, officially the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire
. Beshogur (talk) 21:52, 27 September 2022 (UTC) - Option 2: (UEFA too.) Similar case to Ivory Coast, as stated above. Or at least do asymetric "Option 2A" - Turkey, officially the Republic of Türkiye.Chrz (talk) 22:11, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Option 1 What does "officially" mean in this context? Normally the legal and therefore "official" name of a country is defined under the laws and constitution of that country in the language of that country. How that is translated into foreign languages is not normally defined by the laws of that country. Hence all the Wikipedia country articles where the name of the country is not in English says "officially X" and then gives the local language name. That's not because it is "officially" called that in English - it's a shorthand for "officially [name in local language] which reliable sources translate as X in English". In the WP context it's the most effective way of communicating to english speakers the official name in the country's language. It never is a statement as to the "officiality" of the English translation. There is in fact an implicit de facto overlap with WP:COMMONNAME. There is only one official name for the Republic of Turkey and that's Türkiye Cumhuriyeti under the law and constitution of Turkey and nothing has changed that. reliable sources continue to translate that in English as "Republic of Turkey". No law has been enacted in Turkey determining an "official" name in English (the presidential memo isn't a law and he has no authority to enact one). The UN - despite the much touted "registration" isn't, in this context, some international registry of official state names in English. all that's happened there is that they've acceded to Erdoğan's request to have the name plate in the assembly and on the website changed. DeCausa (talk) 22:19, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Other proposals
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists
- Wikipedia former featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- B-Class Turkey articles
- Top-importance Turkey articles
- All WikiProject Turkey pages
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- B-Class country articles
- WikiProject Countries articles
- B-Class Asia articles
- Top-importance Asia articles
- WikiProject Asia articles
- B-Class Europe articles
- High-importance Europe articles
- WikiProject Europe articles
- B-Class Assyrian articles
- High-importance Assyrian articles
- WikiProject Assyria articles
- Wikipedia requests for comment