Jump to content

User talk:Smirkybec: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Line 238: Line 238:


I'm not entirely sure why my initial web link to a Reddit thread, which includes a scan from an American newspaper circa 1951 with an actual potato chip sandwich recipe, isn't considered "reliable" or at the very least evidence that it didn't originate in the UK. A similar recipe also appeared nearly 40 years ago in the American "White Trash Cooking" book, which I also referenced. Compare these with the existing enumerated sources, none of which establish that it's a UK-only recipe. If anything, reference [1] itself indicates otherwise. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:8C0:881:8200:4CAD:995B:1F5A:12C1|2601:8C0:881:8200:4CAD:995B:1F5A:12C1]] ([[User talk:2601:8C0:881:8200:4CAD:995B:1F5A:12C1#top|talk]]) 18:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
I'm not entirely sure why my initial web link to a Reddit thread, which includes a scan from an American newspaper circa 1951 with an actual potato chip sandwich recipe, isn't considered "reliable" or at the very least evidence that it didn't originate in the UK. A similar recipe also appeared nearly 40 years ago in the American "White Trash Cooking" book, which I also referenced. Compare these with the existing enumerated sources, none of which establish that it's a UK-only recipe. If anything, reference [1] itself indicates otherwise. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:8C0:881:8200:4CAD:995B:1F5A:12C1|2601:8C0:881:8200:4CAD:995B:1F5A:12C1]] ([[User talk:2601:8C0:881:8200:4CAD:995B:1F5A:12C1#top|talk]]) 18:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:It is interesting that you are talking about a cultural bias while citing the "UK" when the article clearly has a lot more content talking about the crisp sandwich in Ireland, and also mentions Australia. The problem is your complete re-framing of the article without discussion, the dish might have existed for a long time in the US as well, but that doesn't mean you can just override the current framing completely. Also the way in which you are phrasing the sentence you're attempting to add is biased and doesn't adhere to [[WP:NPOV]]. On a more technical note, pointing to a Reddit thread is not a reliable citation or good practice on Wikipedia, if you mean to cite the newspaper article then cite the newspaper article. Local newspapers don't hold as much weight on Wikipedia as sources in general. As I don't have access to the book, I cannot comment on that citation.
:TLDR don't continuously revert, and perhaps engage sooner so that we can reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] sooner. [[User:Smirkybec|Smirkybec]] ([[User talk:Smirkybec#top|talk]]) 19:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:06, 16 June 2022

June events from Women in Red

Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Twitter Survey

Hello! A couple years ago you did a Twitter survey about Hiberno-English vs Irish English. I'm wondering if (if you have any free time or the wherewithal), you'd be able to do something like that for England English vs English English vs Anglo-English (vs maybe even just Other). Not sure how the Twitterz work. Thanks for any help! Wolfdog (talk) 15:56, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wolfdog: interesting idea! That time I was a curator on the Motherfoclóir podcast twitter account which meant it had a BIG following, I don't have access to that and also, I don't think that audience would have as much of a buy-in on that question (I might be wrong). Ideally you'd get someone like No Such Thing as a Fish, Dan Schrieber, or Susi Dent to tweet about it! Smirkybec (talk) 14:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I appreciate the explanation. I'm a Twitter-ignoramus! Wolfdog (talk) 00:55, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
40 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Northside, Dublin (talk) Add sources
126 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Malahide (talk) Add sources
17 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Killester (talk) Add sources
56 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Phibsborough (talk) Add sources
8 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Rolestown (talk) Add sources
400 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B University College Dublin (talk) Add sources
34 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Donaghmede (talk) Cleanup
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Ballyfermot College of Further Education (talk) Cleanup
129 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Maynooth University (talk) Cleanup
14 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Science Gallery (talk) Expand
31 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Kilcullen (talk) Expand
91 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Arklow (talk) Expand
572 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C County Cork (talk) Unencyclopaedic
32 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Templemore (talk) Unencyclopaedic
14 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Transport 21 (talk) Unencyclopaedic
714 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Wilderness therapy (talk) Merge
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Black Virgin of Oropa (talk) Merge
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Matheus de Castro (talk) Merge
68 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Osraige (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Robert Templeton (talk) Wikify
45 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Gabe Turner (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA The Local (magazine) (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Cathriona Hallahan (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Helios Foundation (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Rathcabbin (talk) Stub
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Arbour Hill (talk) Stub
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Dilukai (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start St Andrew's Street, Dublin (talk) Stub
14 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Loughshinny (talk) Stub
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Man of War, Fingal (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:38, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So, here's the problem with the article as it stands: The entire tone of the article implies that the "crisp sandwich" is a relatively modern UK invention/phenomenon, when numerous sources (several of which I've provided already) clearly establish that it's a US invention that's been around for more than 70 years, possibly longer. I'm guessing the article was first written by a Brit with quite a bit of cultural bias, and although it contains a plethora of sources, what's being conveyed is still false/misleading.

I'm not entirely sure why my initial web link to a Reddit thread, which includes a scan from an American newspaper circa 1951 with an actual potato chip sandwich recipe, isn't considered "reliable" or at the very least evidence that it didn't originate in the UK. A similar recipe also appeared nearly 40 years ago in the American "White Trash Cooking" book, which I also referenced. Compare these with the existing enumerated sources, none of which establish that it's a UK-only recipe. If anything, reference [1] itself indicates otherwise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8C0:881:8200:4CAD:995B:1F5A:12C1 (talk) 18:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is interesting that you are talking about a cultural bias while citing the "UK" when the article clearly has a lot more content talking about the crisp sandwich in Ireland, and also mentions Australia. The problem is your complete re-framing of the article without discussion, the dish might have existed for a long time in the US as well, but that doesn't mean you can just override the current framing completely. Also the way in which you are phrasing the sentence you're attempting to add is biased and doesn't adhere to WP:NPOV. On a more technical note, pointing to a Reddit thread is not a reliable citation or good practice on Wikipedia, if you mean to cite the newspaper article then cite the newspaper article. Local newspapers don't hold as much weight on Wikipedia as sources in general. As I don't have access to the book, I cannot comment on that citation.
TLDR don't continuously revert, and perhaps engage sooner so that we can reach consensus sooner. Smirkybec (talk) 19:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]