Carbon footprint: Difference between revisions

A carbon footprint is “the total set of GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions caused directly and indirectly by an individual, organization, event or product” (UK Carbon Trust 2008). An individual, nation or organization's carbon footprint is measured by undertaking a GHG emissions assessment. Once the size of a carbon footprint is known, a strategy can be devised to reduce it.

Carbon offsets, or the mitigation of carbon emissions through the development of alternative projects such as solar or wind energy or reforestation, represent one way of managing a carbon footprint.

The concept and name of the carbon footprint originates from the ecological footprint discussion.^[1] The carbon footprint is a subset of the ecological footprint.

The carbon footprint can be efficiently and effectively reduced by using a Carbon Diet or applying the following steps:

• Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to accurately determine the current carbon footprint
• Identification of hot-spots in terms of energy consumption and associated CO
  ₂-emissions
• Where possible, changing to another electricity company to switch to buying electricity from renewable sources (from wind turbines, solar panels or hydroelectrical plants -or- from nuclear power plants
• Optimisation of energy efficiency and, thus, reduction of CO
  ₂-emissions and reduction of other GHG emissions contributed from production processes
• Identification of solutions to neutralise the CO
  ₂ emissions that cannot be eliminated by energy saving measures. This last step includes carbon offsetting; investment in projects that aim at the reducing CO
  ₂ emissions, for instance tree planting.

mfjsksldkvnkdls;LSDKJF;SJDNFAWJDNFKWHJNDBHJAKBDNFAJDSV;ASKD

Carbon dioxide emissions to air (and the emissions of other GHG's) are almost exclusively associated with the conversion of energy carriers like natural gas, crude oil, etc.

The Kyoto Protocol defines legally binding targets and timetables for cutting the greenhouse-gas emissions of industrialized countries that ratified the Kyoto Protocol. Accordingly, from an economic or market perspective, one has to distinguish between a mandatory market and a voluntary market. Typical for both markets is the trade with emission certificates:

• Certified Emission Reduction (CER)
• Emission Reduction Unit (ERU)
• Verified Emission Reduction (VER)

To reach the goals defined in the Kyoto Protocol with least economical costs the following flexible mechanisms were introduced for the mandatory market:

• Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)
• Joint Implementation (JI)
• Emissions trading

The CDM and JI mechanisms specify requirements for projects which create a supply of emission reduction instruments, whilst Emissions Trading allows those instruments to be sold on international markets.

- Projects which are compliant with the requirements of the CDM mechanism generate Certified Emissions Reductions (CERs).
- Projects which are compliant with the requirements of the JI mechanism generate Emissions Reduction Units (ERUs).

The CERs and ERUs can then be sold through Emissions Trading. The demand for the CERs and ERUs being traded is driven by:

- Shortfalls in national emission reduction obligations under the Kyoto Protocol.
- Shortfalls amongst entities obligated under local emissions reduction schemes.

Nations which have failed to deliver their Kyoto emissions reductions obligations can enter Emissions Trading to purchase CERS and ERUs to cover their treaty shortfalls. Nations and groups of nations can also create local emission reduction schemes which place mandatory CO2 targets on entities within their national boundaries. If the rules of a scheme allow, the obligated entities may be able to cover all or some of any reduction shortfalls by purchasing CERs and ERUs through Emissions Trading. While local emissions reduction schemes have no status under the Kyoto Protocol itself, they play a prominent role in creating the demand for CERs and ERUs, stimulating Emissions Trading and setting a market price for emissions.

A well-known mandatory local emissions trading scheme is the EU Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS).

In contrast to the strict rules set out for the mandatory market, the voluntary market provides companies with different options to acquire emissions reductions. A solution, comparable with those developed for the mandatory market, has been developed for the voluntary market, the Verified Emission Reductions (VER). This measure has the great advantage that the projects/activities are managed according to the quality standards set out for CDM/JI projects but the certificates provided are not registered by the governments of the host countries or the Executive Board of the UNO. As such, high quality VERs can be acquired at lower costs for the same project quality. However, at present VERs can not be used in the mandatory market.

The voluntary market in North America is divided between members of the Chicago Climate Exchange and the Over The Counter (OTC) market. The Chicago Climate Exchange is a voluntary yet legally binding cap-and-trade emission scheme whereby members commit to the capped emission reductions and must purchase allowances from other members or offset excess emissions. The OTC market does not involve a legally binding scheme and a wide array of buyers from the public and private spheres, as well as special events that want to go carbon neutral.

There are project developers, wholesalers, brokers, and retailers, as well as carbon funds, in the voluntary market. Some businesses and nonprofits in the voluntary market encompass more than just one of the activities listed above. A report by Ecosystem Marketplace shows that carbon offset prices increase as it moves along the supply chain——from project developer to retailer. [1].

While some mandatory emission reduction schemes exclude forest projects, these projects flourish in the voluntary markets. A major criticism concerns the imprecise nature of GHG sequestration quantification methodologies for forestry projects. However, others note the community co-benefits that forestry projects foster. Project types in the voluntary market range from avoided deforestation, afforestation/reforestation, industrial gas sequestration, increased energy efficiency, fuel switching, methane capture from coal plants and livestock, and even renewable energy. Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) sold on the voluntary market are quite controversial due to additionality concerns.[2]. Industrial Gas projects receive criticism because such projects only apply to large industrial plants that already have high fixed costs. Siphoning off industrial gas for sequestration is considered picking the low hanging fruit; which is why credits generated from industrial gas projects are the cheapest in the voluntary market.

The size and activity of the voluntary carbon market is difficult to measure. The most comprehensive report on the voluntary carbon markets to date was released by Ecosystem Marketplace and New Carbon Finance in July 2007.[3]. My name is Yuma Kloiser-jones 11 years old. Ilove Tyus and Wai pyo in grade 6.

A carbon label, which shows the life cycle carbon emissions or carbon footprint embodied in a product in bringing it to the shelf, was introduced in the UK in March 2007 by the Carbon Trust. The label is closely linked to a collaboration between The Carbon Trust and The British Standards Institute. The label is intended to comply with a new British Standard, PAS2050, ([4]) and is being actively piloted by The Carbon Trust and various industrial partners ([5]).
Examples of products which already feature this carbon footprint label include Walkers Crisps, a smoothie product from Innocent Drinks, and a shampoo product produced by Boots Group.

A number of studies have calculated the carbon footprint of organisations and nations. One UK study by the Stockholm Environment Institute (Gary Haq et al, 2007) examined age-related carbon emissions based on expenditure and consumption. The study found that on average people aged 50-65 years have a higher carbon footprint than any other age group. Individuals aged 50-55 years old have a carbon footprint of approximately 13.5 tonnes/capita per year compared to the UK average of 12 tonnes.^[2]

It has been suggested that this article be merged into Life cycle assessment. (Discuss) Proposed since July 2008.

The following table compares the carbon footprint of various forms of energy generation, from a study of full life cycle emissions by the Swedish utility Vattenfall of Nuclear, Hydro, Coal, Gas, Solar Cell, Peat and Wind generation technology (^[3] and ^[4]), from the United States Environmental Protection Agency‎ figures ^[5] and from various other studies.

The Vattenfall study thus concluded that hydroelectric and nuclear power produced the least CO₂ per kilowatt-hour of any of their electricity sources. These figures do not allow for emissions due to accidents or terrorism. Lastly some relatively new green renewable electricity generation methods such as geothermal power emit no carbon during operation, but do leave a minor footprint during contruction phase using the cradle-to-grave approach of the complete production life cycle.

The previous table gives the carbon footprint per kWh of electricity generated, which is about half the worlds man made CO2 output. The CO2 footprint for heat is equally significant and is contained in the following table [6] IT shows that using waste heat from power generation has the lowest carbon footprint.

An analysis of the carbon footprint of Christmas in the UK shows that consumption of items such as food, travel, lighting and gifts at Christmas produces as much as 650 kg of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person - equal to 5.5% of the UK annual carbon footprint. Over Christmas, the average person could produce as much as:

• 26 kg of CO2 from Christmas food
• 96 kg of CO2 from Christmas Car travel
• 218 kg of CO2 from extravagant lighting displays
• 310 kg of CO2 on Christmas Shopping

Christmas carbon emissions could be reduced by up to 60 percent to about 250 kg. ^[8]

Template:Multicol

• 2000 Watt society
• Carbon diet
• Carbon intensity
• Chief Green Officer
• Click4Carbon
• Earthcheck
• Ecological footprint
• Ecosharing
• Energy Neutral Design
• Energy policy
• Enterprise carbon accounting
• Greenhouse debt

Template:Multicol-break

• Global warming
• Green conventions, meetings & events
• Life cycle assessment
• List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions per capita
• List of countries by greenhouse gas emissions per capita
• Low carbon diet
• Medical tourism
• Telecommuting
• Water footprint
• Weighted average cost of carbon

Template:Multicol-end

• UK Carbon Trust (2008) "Carbon Footprinting".
• Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology POST (2006). Carbon footprint of electricity generation. October 2006, Number 268
• Wiedmann, T. and J. Minx (2008). A Definition of 'Carbon Footprint'. Ecological Economics Research Trends. C. C. Pertsova: Chapter 1, pp. 1-11. [[Nova Science Publishers, Inc, Hauppauge NY, USA. https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=5999, also available as ISA-UK Research Report 07/01 from http://www.censa.org.uk/reports.html.
• World Energy Council Report (2004). Comparison of energy systems using life cycle assessment.
• Energetics (2007). The reality of carbon neutrality.

• A Definition of Carbon Footprint ISA Research and Consulting United Kingdom
• Carbon Footprint: what it is and how to measure it European Commission
• Introduction to Life Cycle Assessment European Commission
• LCA Resources Directory European Commission
• Carbon footprint calculator The Nature Conservancy