Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/T-26/archive1/Archive 1

I self-nominate the T-26 article for an A-class peer review because I believe it fits the requirements, and it passed the single review for Good Article status pretty quickly. Although I'm currently waiting for a book to arrive through the mail so that I can add missing information to the article, I believe that the T-26 article already has what's necessary to be an A-class article. Beyond that, any feedback would be much appreciated. JonCatalan 16:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose For now. Too many textual errors at the moment, eg:

With no major proponents of Tukhachevsky's theories alive or willing to speak, which previous advances were thrown out the window

After Khalkin Gol the T-26S would have a thicker armour plate and this plate welded onto the hull, as opposed to riveted.

Needs a careful re-read but the article has potential for A-Class.

All citations should come after the punctuation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymond Palmer (talk • contribs)

I made some minor textual edits to those two sentences, and some other things I found, but I'd really appreciate it if a better writer would look over it. I also fixed all the referencing. Thanks! JonCatalan 18:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. A few too many text errors:

• Who's Tukhachevky? (first paragraph after intro)
• The last paragraph of the "Birth" section probably belongs in a different section.
• Not all assertions are cited. One way around this is to make sure there's a citation at the end of every paragraph.

I think it's almost there. Cla68 06:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]